Microbial Risk Assessment of Pathogens in Water
Water can transmit infectious diseases. Water can be transport vehicle. A range of pathogenic microorganisms is shed into the water cycle by infected hosts (man or animal) and transported to new hosts by the water cycle. Water can also be a niche for (opportunistic) pathogens. These pathogens grow in water ecosystems (natural or man-made) and may infect humans that come into contact with this water. Management of the risk of waterborne disease transmission requires knowledge about the nature of the pathogens, their potential growth, fate and transport in the water cycle, the routes of exposure to humans and the health effects that may result from this exposure in the human population, as well as the effect of potential mitigation measures.
KeywordsFiltration Ozone Chlorinate Diarrhea Sewage
- Dose-response assessment
The determination of the relationship between the magnitude of exposure (dose) to a microbiological agent and the severity and/or frequency of the associated adverse health effects (response).
- Exposure assessment
Qualitative and/or quantitative evaluation of the likely intake of microbial hazard via all relevant sources or a specific source.
Concentration or amount of an infectious microorganism that reaches the target population, or organism usually expressed in numerical terms of substance, concentration, duration, and frequency.
- HACCP: Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
A system that identifies, evaluates, and controls hazards that are significant for water safety.
A biological agent with the potential to cause an adverse health effect.
- Hazard identification
The identification of microbiological and biological agents capable of causing adverse health effects that may be present in water.
- Hazardous event
An event that may lead to the presence of a hazard in drinking water.
- Health effects
Changes in morphology, physiology growth, development or life span of an organism, which results in impairment of functional capacity or impairment of capacity to compensate for additional stress or increase in susceptibility to the harmful effects or other environmental influences.
Colonization of a human (tissue) by a microorganism.
- Infectious disease
Colonization by a pathogenic microorganism leading to overt symptoms of disease.
A microorganism capable of causing disease.
Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
- Risk assessment
A scientifically based process consisting of the following steps: (1) hazard identification, (2) exposure assessment, (3) effect assessment, and (4) risk characterization.
- Risk characterization
The qualitative and quantitative estimation, including attendant uncertainties of the probability of occurrence and severity of known or potential adverse health effects in a given population based on hazard identification, hazard characterization, and exposure assessment.
The likelihood of occurrence of an adverse health effect consequent to a hazard in drinking water.
Lack of knowledge about specific factors, parameters, or models. Uncertainty includes parameter uncertainty (measurement errors, sampling errors, systematic errors), model uncertainty (uncertainty due to necessary simplification of real-world processes, mis-specification of the model structure, model misuse, use of inappropriate surrogate variables), and scenario uncertainty (descriptive errors, aggregation errors, errors in professional judgment, incomplete analysis).
Intrinsic heterogeneity in a population, process, or parameter.
- Water Safety Plan (WSP)
A management plan developed to address all aspects of water supply that are under the direct control of the water supplier focused on the control of water production, treatment, and distribution to deliver drinking water.
- 1.Aboytes R, DiGiovanni G, Abrams F, Rheinecker C, McElroy W, Shaw N, LeChevallier MW (2004) Detection of infectious Cryptosporidium in filtered drinking water. J Am Water Works Assoc 96(9):88–98Google Scholar
- 2.Adham SS, Trussel RR, Gagliardo PF, Olivieri AW (1998) Membranes: a barrier to microorganisms. Water Supply 16(1–2):336–340Google Scholar
- 3.Asano T, Leong LYC, Rigby MG, Sakaji RH (1992) Evaluation of the California wastewater reclamation criteria using enteric virus monitoring data. Water Sci Technol 26(7–8):1513–1524Google Scholar
- 5.Atherholt TB, LeChevallier MW, Norton WD, Rosen JS (1998) Effect of rainfall on Giardia and Cryptosporidium. J Am Water Works Assoc 90:66–80Google Scholar
- 6.Australia (2005) Australian guidelines for water recycling: managing health and environmental risks (phase 1). Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, Environment Protection and Heritage Council, Australian Health Ministers’ Conference, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bartram J, Fewtrell L, Stenström TA (2001) Harmonised assessment of risk and risk management for water-related infectious disease: an overview. In: Fewtrell L, Bartram J (eds) Water quality: guidelines, standards and health. IWA Publishing, London, pp 1–16Google Scholar
- 8.Benford D (2001) Principals of risk assessment of food and drinking water related to human health, ILSI Europe concise monograph series. International Life Science Institute, Belgium, pp 1–43Google Scholar
- 10.CODEX (1997) Codex Alimentarius Commission: procedure manual. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- 11.Deere D, Davison A (2004) Health risk assessment of fire fighting from recycled water. Occasional Paper 11. Water Services of Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- 13.EFSA (2009) Transparancy in risk assessment – scientific aspects. Scientific opinion. EFSA J 1051:1–22Google Scholar
- 15.EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) Economic analysis for the final long term 2 enhanced surface water treatment rule. EPA, Office of Water report EPA 815-R-06-001. EPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Fewtrell L, Bartram J (2001) Water quality: guidelines, standards and health. Risk assessment and management for water related infectious diseases. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 18.Finch GR, Gyurek LL, Liyanage LRJ, Belosevic M (1997) Effect of various disinfecion methods on the inactivation of Cryptosporidium. American Water Works Association Research Foundation, DenverGoogle Scholar
- 20.Gale P (2000) Risk assessment model for a waterborne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis. Water Sci Technol 41(7):1–7Google Scholar
- 21.Gale P (2002) Using risk assessment to identify future research requirements. J Am Water Works Assoc 94(9):30–42Google Scholar
- 22.Gale P, Stanfield G (2000) Cryptosporidium during a simulated outbreak. J Am Water Works Assoc 92(9):105Google Scholar
- 25.Haas CN, Crockett CS, Rose JB, Gerba CP, Fazil AM (1996) Assessing the Risk Posed by Oocysts in Drinking Water. J Am Water Works Assoc 88(9):131–136Google Scholar
- 26.Haas CN, Rose JB, Gerba CP (1999) Quantitative microbial risk assessment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 27.Haas CN, Eisenberg JNS (2001) Risk assessment. In: Fewtrell L, Bartram J (eds) Water quality: guidelines, standards and health. IWA Publishing, London, pp 161–183Google Scholar
- 28.Hashimoto A, Hirata T (1999) Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in Sagami river, Japan. In: Proceedings of the Asian water quallity 1999; 7th reginal IAWQ conference. Taipei, Taiwan, vol 2, pp 956–961Google Scholar
- 29.Havelaar AH, Teunis PFM, Medema GJ (1996) Risk assessment of waterborne pathogens. Presented at the symposium waterborne pathogens, Bonn, 22–25 MayGoogle Scholar
- 31.Havelaar AH, Melse JM (2003) Quantifying health risks in the WHO guidelines for drinking water quality. A burden of disease approach. Report 734301022, RIVM, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
- 33.Hirata T, Hashimoto A (1998) Experimental assessment of the efficacy of microfiltration and ultrafiltration for Cryptosporidium removal. Water Sci Technol 41(7):103–107Google Scholar
- 35.Hrudey S, Hrudey E (2004) Safe drinking water, Lessons from recent outbreaks in affluent nations. IWA Publishing, London, 486 ppGoogle Scholar
- 37.Hutton P, Ashbolt N, Vesey G, Walker J, Ongerth J (1995) Cryptosporidium and Giardia in the aquatic environment of Sydney, Australia. In: Betts WB et al (eds) Protozoan parasites and water. Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 39.LeChevallier MW, Norton WD, Lee RG (1991) Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. in surface water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2610–2616Google Scholar
- 40.LeChevallier MW, Norton WD (1995) Giardia and Cryptosporidium in raw and finished water. J Am Water Works Assoc 87(9):54–68Google Scholar
- 41.LeChevalier MW, Norton W, Abbaszadegan M, Atherholt T, Rosen J (1998) Development of a monitoring strategy to determine variations in Giardia and Cryptosporidium levels in a watershed. In: Proceeding of source water protection international 1998, DallasGoogle Scholar
- 45.Mangen MJJ, Havelaar AH, Bernsen RAJAM, Van Koningsveld R, De Wit GA (2005) The costs of human Campylobacter infections and sequelae in the Netherlands: a DALY and cost-of-illness approach. Food Econ Acta Agric Scand 2(1):35–51Google Scholar
- 47.Medema GJ, Teunis PFM, Gornik V, Havelaar AH, Exner M (1995) Estimation of the Cryptosporidium infection risk via drinking water. In: Betts WB et al (eds) Protozoan parasites and water. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 53–56Google Scholar
- 49.Medema GJ, Loret JF, Stenström TA, Ashbolt NJ (2006) Quantitative microbial risk assessment in the water safety plan. Report Microrisk, Kiwa Water Research, Nieuwegein. www.microrisk.com
- 50.Medema GJ (2009) Risk assessment of Cryptosporidium in drinking water. World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 52.Michaels D (2008) Doubt is their product: how industry’s assault on science threathens your health. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 53.Mons MN, van der Wielen JHML, Blokker EJM, Sinclair MI, Hulshof KFAM, Dangendorf F, Hunter PR, Medema GJ (2007) Estimation of the consumption of cold tap water for microbiological risk assessment: an overview of studies and statistical analysis of data. J Water Health 5(Suppl 1):151–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.NRC (2009) Science and decisions, Advancing risk assessment. National Research Council. The national Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 58.Petterson SA, Ashbolt NJ (2005) WHO guidelines for the safe use of wastewater and excreta in agriculture. Microbial Risk Assessment Section. www.who.int/wsh
- 60.Regli S, Rose JB, Haas CN, Gerba CP (1991) Modeling the risk from Giardia and viruses in drinking water. J Am Water Works Assoc 83:76–84Google Scholar
- 61.Regli S, Odom R, Cromwell J, Lustic M, Blank V (1999) Benefits and costs of the IESWTR. J Am Water Works Assoc 91(4):148–158Google Scholar
- 62.Rose JB, Lisle JT, Haas CN (1995) Risk assessment methods for Cryptosporidium and Giardia in contaminated water. In: Betts WB et al (eds) Protozoan parasites and water. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 238–242Google Scholar
- 64.Roser D, Petterson S, Signor R, Ashbolt N, Nilsson P, Thorwaldsdotter R (2006) How to implement QMRA to estimate baseline and hazardous event risks with management end uses in mind. Report Microrisk, Kiwa Water Research, Nieuwegein. www.microrisk.com
- 65.Smeets P (2008) Stochastic modelling of drinking water treatment in quantitative microbiological risk assessment. PhD thesis, Delft University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 67.Teunis PFM, Havelaar AH (1997) Cryptosporidium in drinking water. Evaluation of the ILSI/RSI quantitative risk assessment framework. RIVM, Bilthoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 68.Teunis PFM, Havelaar AH (1999) Cryptosporidium in drinking water. Evaluation of the ILSI/RSI quantitative risk assessment framework. Report no. 284 550 006 RIVM, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
- 69.Westrell T (2004) Microbial risk assessment and its implications for risk management in urban water systems. Thesis Linköping University, LinköpingGoogle Scholar
- 71.WHO (1993) Guidelines for drinking water quality, 2nd edn. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 72.WHO (1999) Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment. WHO, Geneva, CAC/GL-30Google Scholar
- 73.WHO (2004) Guidelines for drinking water quality, 3rd edn. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 74.WHO (2006) Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and grey water. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 76.Yates MV, Gerba CP (1998) Microbial considerations in wastewater reclamation and reuse. In: Asano T (ed) wastewater reclamation and reuse, vol 10, Water Quality Management Library. Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, pp 437–488Google Scholar