Species Competition and Predation

Abstract

Biogeochemistry represents the interaction of biology, chemistry, and geology in the Earth system. For many processes, an understanding of biological uptake and emission, chemical processing, and geological sequestration is necessary to resolve the sources and sinks of a particular constituent. For example, to discover the sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide, it is important to understand how biota take up carbon dioxide and chemically convert the carbon to organic carbon, and then how this organic carbon is used either to produce energy by biota or is deposited to the land or ocean surface and can become sequestered in geological formations.

Keywords

Biomass Migration Dioxide Covariance Geochemistry 

Glossary

Apparent competition

The tendency for an increase in the density of a species to increase the impact of a natural enemy on that same species or other species.

Competition

The tendency for an increase in the density of a species to have a negative effect on the survival or reproduction of individuals of the same species or of other species by reducing resource abundance, reducing access to resources, or by direct harm of one individual organism on another associated with resource acquisition.

Density dependence

The tendency for an increase in the density of a species to have a negative effect on the survival or reproduction of individuals of the same or different species. As used in this essay, the species in question are in the same guild. Competition and apparent competition are special cases of density dependence.

Feedback loop

A chain of species interactions from one member of a guild, through other species, back to a species in that same guild. Feedback loops transmit density dependence.

Guild

A group of species potentially co-occurring in the same locality and having similar ecology in the sense of depending on the same or similar resources, often seeking those resources in similar ways, and susceptible to the same or similar natural enemies. The standard of similarity in this definition is not precise, and varies depending on the purpose of the investigator.

Natural enemy

An organism that benefits its own reproduction or survival by harming the individuals of a given species, commonly by feeding on them.

Niche overlap

For any pair of species, the degree to which density dependence through feedback loops is concentrated between species compared to within species. It is measured by the quantity ρ which varies between zero for no overlap (no interspecific density dependence) and 1 for complete overlap (interspecific density dependence is on average equal to intraspecific density dependence).

Predator

A species that gains food by killing and consuming individuals of the species in the ecological guild in question.

Species average fitness

For a given species in a guild, it is a numerical measure of how well that species is adapted to the environment with the property that it predicts which species would dominate if the niche overlaps, ρ, were all equal to 1. It is normally related to the long-term average per capita growth rates of the species measured at fixed levels of competition and apparent competition. In this essay, the fitnesses κ are obtained from per capita growth rates at zero levels of competition and apparent competition, which are achieved by setting all members of a guild at zero density. These growth rates are then divided by scaling factors that correct for differences between species in their levels of sensitivity to competition and apparent competition.

Stable coexistence

The tendency of the members of a guild to recover when individually perturbed to low density, allowing their long-term persistence in the presence of interactions with other guild members.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful for comments on the manuscript by Jonathan Levine and for support from the National Science Foundation grant numbers DEB-0717222 and DEB-0816231.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. 1.
    Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacArthur R (1970) Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theor Popul Biol 1:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Connolly SR, Roughgarden J (1999) Theory of marine communities: competition, predation, and recruitment-dependent interaction strength. Ecol Monogr 69:277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank DA, McNaughton SJ, Tracy BF (1998) The ecology of the Earth's grazing ecosystems. Bioscience 48:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Birch LC (1957) The meanings of competition. Am Nat 91:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dayan T, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecol Lett 8:875–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Levine JM (2007) A niche for neutrality. Ecol Lett 10:95–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chesson P (2008) Quantifying and testing species coexistence mechanisms. In: Valladares F, Camacho A, Elosegui A, Gracia C, Estrada M, Senar JC, Gili JM (eds) Unity in diversity: reflections on ecology after the legacy of Ramon Margalef. Fundacion BBVA, Bilbao, pp 119–164Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siepielski AM, McPeek MA (2010) On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program. Ecology 91:3153–3164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chase JM, Abrams PA, Grover JP, Diehl S, Chesson P, Holt RD, Richards SA, Nisbet RM, Case TJ (2002) The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol Lett 5:302–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chesson P, Kuang JJ (2008) The interaction between predation and competition. Nature 456:235–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12:197–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicholson AJ (1937) The role of competition in determining animal populations. JSIR (Australia) 10:101–106Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals. Am Nat 93:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roughgarden J (1989) Community structure and assembly. In: Roughgarden J, May RM, Levin SA (eds) Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 203–226Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holt RD (1984) Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am Nat 124:377–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chesson P, Huntly N (1993) Temporal hierarchies of variation and the maintenance of diversity. Plant Species Biol 8:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kang Y, Chesson P (2010) Relative nonlinearity and permanence. Theor Popul Biol 78:26–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holt RD, Polis GA (1997) A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am Nat 149:745–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abrams PA (1998) High competition with low similarity and low competition with high similarity: exploitative and apparent competition in consumer-resource systems. Am Nat 152:114–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abrams PA, Rueffler C (2009) Coexistence and limiting similarity of consumer species competing for a linear array of resources. Ecology 90:812–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chase JM, Leibold MA (2003) Ecological Niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Purves DW, Pacala SW (2005) Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process. In: Burslem D, Pinard M, Hartley S (eds) Biotic interactions in the tropics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 103–138Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang DY, Lin K (1997) The effects of competitive asymmetry on the rate of competitive displacement: how robust is Hubbell's community drift model? J Theor Biol 188:361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chesson P, Huntly N (1997) The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am Nat 150:519–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lubchenco J (1978) Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities. Am Nat 112:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gurevitch J, Morrison JA, Hedges LV (2000) The interaction between competition and predation: a meta-analysis of field experiments. Am Nat 155:435–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paine RT (1969) A note on trophic complexity and community stability. Am Nat 103:91–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Power ME, Tilman D, Estes JA, Menge BA, Bond WJ, Mills LS, Daily G, Castilla JC, Lubchenco J, Paine RT (1996) Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience 46:609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grover JP, Holt RD (1998) Disentangling resource and apparent competition: realistic models for plant-herbivore communities. J Theor Biol 191:353–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Levin SA (1970) Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. Am Nat 104:413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Crooks KR, Soule ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Johnson CN, Isaac JL, Fisher DO (2007) Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 274:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Knowlton JL, Donlan CJ, Roemer GW, Samaniego-Herrera A, Kertt BS, Wood B, Aguirre-Munoz A, Faulknier KR, Tershy BR (2007) Eradication of non-native mammals and the status of insular mammals on the California Channel Islands, USA, and Pacific Baja California Peninsula Islands, Mexico. Southwest Nat 52:528–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (eds) (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Haygood R (2002) Coexistence in MacArthur-style consumer–resource models. Theor Popul Biol 61:215–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Holt RD (1985) Density-independent morality, nonlinear competitive interactions and species coexistence. J Theor Biol 116:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kotler BP, Holt RD (1989) Predation and competition: the interaction of two types of species interactions. Oikos 54:256–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Holt RD, Grover J, Tilman D (1994) Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am Nat 144:741–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kuang JJ, Chesson P (2010) Interacting coexistence mechanisms in annual plant communities: frequency-dependent predation and the storage effect. Theor Popul Biol 77:56–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chesson P, Kuang JJ (2010) The storage effect due to frequency-dependent predation in multispecies plant communities. Theor Popul Biol 78:148–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Murdoch WW, Bence J (1987) General predators and unstable prey populations. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover and London, pp 17–30Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Abrams PA, Matsuda H (2004) Consequences of behavioral dynamics for the population dynamics of predator-prey systems with switching. Popul Ecol 46:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bond AB (2007) The evolution of color polymorphism: crypticity, searching images, and apostatic selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:489–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. The Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hamback P (1998) Seasonality, optimal foraging and prey coexistence. Am Nat 152:881–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Krivan V (2003) Competitive co-existence by adaptive predators. Evol Ecol Res 5:1163–1182Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    May RM (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chesson P, Gebauer RLE, Schwinning S, Huntly N, Wiegand K, Ernest MSK, Sher A, Novoplansky A, Weltzin JF (2004) Resource pulses, species interactions and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments. Oecologia 141:236–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Angert AL, Huxman TE, Chesson P, Venable DL (2009) Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:11641–11645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kuang JJ, Chesson P (2009) Coexistence of annual plants: generalist seed predation weakens the storage effect. Ecology 90:170–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kuang JJ, Chesson P (2008) Predation-competition interactions for seasonally recruiting species. Am Nat 171:E119–E133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Abrams P, Holt R (2002) The impact of consumer–resource cycles on the coexistence of competing consumers. Theor Popul Biol 62:281–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Huisman J, Weissing FJ (1999) Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 402:407–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Huisman J, Weissing FJ (2001) Fundamental unpredictability in multispecies competition. Am Nat 157:488–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Amarasekare P, Nisbet RM (2001) Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. Am Nat 158:572–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Muko S, Iwasa Y (2003) Incomplete mixing promotes species coexistence in a lottery model with permanent spatial heterogeneity. Theor Popul Biol 64:359–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Snyder RE, Chesson P (2004) How the spatial scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact to affect coexistence. Am Nat 164:633–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Miller AD, Chesson P (2009) Coexistence in disturbance prone communities: how a resistance-resilience trade off generates coexistence via the storage effect. Am Nat 173:E30–E43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Amarasekare P (2008) Spatial dynamics of foodwebs. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:479–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ives AR (1988) Covariance, coexistence and the population dynamics of two competitors using a patchy resource. J Theor Biol 133:345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Murrell DJ, Purves DW, Law R (2001) Uniting pattern and process in plant ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 16:529–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hartley S, Shorrocks B (2002) A general framework for the aggregation model of coexistence. J Anim Ecol 71:651–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chesson P, Neuhauser C (2002) Intraspecific aggregation and species coexistence. Trends Ecol Evol 17:210–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bolker B, Pacala S (1999) Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am Nat 153:575–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hastings A (1980) Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor Popul Biol 18:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Connell JH (1979) Tropical rainforests and coral reefs as open non-equilibrium systems. In: Anderson RM, Turner BD, Taylor LR (eds) Population dynamics. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 141–163Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Roxburgh SH, Shea K, Wilson JB (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Caswell H (1978) Predator-mediated coexistence: a nonequilibrium model. Am Nat 112:127–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bolker BM, Pacala SW, Neuhauser C (2003) Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: what do we really know? Am Nat 162:135–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Dushoff J, Worden L, Keymer J, Levin S (2002) Metapopulations, community assenbly, and scale invariance in aspect space. Theor Popul Biol 62:329–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kohyama T (1993) Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest–the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. J Ecol 81:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Vance RR, Nevai AL (2007) Plant population growth and competition in a light gradient: a mathematical model of canopy partitioning. J Theor Biol 245:210–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Connell JH (1970) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and rainforest trees. In: den Boer PJ, Gradwell G (eds) Dynamics of populations. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp 298–312Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104:501–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Adler FR, Muller-Landau HC (2005) When do localized natural enemies increase species richness? Ecol Lett 8:438–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bever JD, Dickie IA, Facelli E, Facelli JM, Klironomos J, Moora M, Rillig MC, Stock WD, Tibbett M, Zobel M (2010) Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 25:468–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Melbourne BA, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone AL, Hall RJ, Harrison S, Hastings A, Holland M, Holyoak M, Lambrinos J, Moore K, Yokomizo H (2007) Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol Lett 10:77–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Drury WH (1998) Chance and change: ecology for conservationists. University of California Press, Berkeley, CalifGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sergio F, Caro T, Brown D, Clucas B, Hunter J, Ketchum J, McHugh K, Hiraldo F (2008) Top predators as conservation tools: ecological rationale, assumptions, and efficacy. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Kinzig A, Pacala S, Tilman D (eds) (2001) The functional consequences of biodiversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sax DF, Gaines SD (2008) Species invasions and extinction: the future of native biodiversity on islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11490–11497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2006) Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol 170:445–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Sher AA, Hyatt LA (1999) The disturbed resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plant invasion. Biological Invasions 1:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Brooks ML (2003) Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. J Appl Ecol 40:344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Simberloff D (1995) Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than mainland areas? Pac Sci 49:87–97Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Elton C (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Levine JM (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM (2009) Plant invasions and the niche. J Ecol 97:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Davies KF, Chesson P, Harrison S, Inouye B, Melbourne BA, Rice KJ (2005) Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology 86:1602–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Courchamp F, Woodroffe R, Roemer G (2003) Removing protected populations to save endangered species. Science 302:1532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Wilson JB (2011) The twelve theories of co-existence in plant communities: the doubtful, the important and the unexplored. J Veg Sci 22:184–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ackerly DD (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164:S165–S184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sears ALW, Chesson P (2007) New methods for quantifying the spatial storage effect: an illustration with desert annuals. Ecology 88:2240–2247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Holt RD (2000) Trophic cascades in terrestrial ecosystems. Tree 15:444–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Chase JM (2003) Strong and weak trophic cascades along a productivity gradient. Oikos 101:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Terborgh J, Estes JA (2010) Trophic cascades: predators, prey, and the changing dynamics of nature. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nunez P, Rao M, Shahabuddin G, Orihuela G, Riveros M, Ascanio R, Adler GH, Lambert TD, Balbas L (2001) Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294:1923–1926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Myers RA, Baum JK, Shepherd TD, Powers SP, Peterson CH (2007) Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315:1846–1850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Letnic M, Koch F (2010) Are dingoes a trophic regulator in arid Australia? A comparison of mammal communities on either side of the dingo fence. Austral Ecol 35:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Meyer JR, Ellner SP, Hairston NG, Jones LE, Yoshida T (2006) Prey evolution on the time scale of predator-prey dynamics revealed by allele-specific quantitative PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10690–10695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Geritz SAH, Kisdi E, Meszena G, Metz JAJ (1998) Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol Ecol 12:35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Morton RD, Law R (1997) Regional species pools and the assembly of local ecological communities. J Theor Biol 187:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    O'Dwyer JP, Lake JK, Ostling A, Savage VM, Green JL (2009) An integrative framework for stochastic, size-structured community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6170–6175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Davis MB (1986) Climatic instability, time-lags and community disequilibrium. In: Diamond J, Case T (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, Cambridge, pp 269–284Google Scholar

Books and Reviews

  1. Eisenberg C (2010) The wolf's tooth: keystone predators, trophic cascades, and biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Grant PR, Grant BR (2008) How and why species multiply: the radiation of Darwin's finches. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations