Skip to main content

Image Guidance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2472 Accesses

Abstract

Image guidance (IG) can serve as a very important adjunct to the surgeon during MISS. There is robust data showing that IG decreases the incidence of suboptimal screw placement. The ability of IG to decrease the incidence of neurological complications or need for reoperations following thoracolumbar instrumentation remains unclear. IG offers particular advantages in cases of severe deformity or other altered anatomy as well as for the intraoperative training of residents and fellows. IG offers the further benefit of minimizing occupational exposures to ionizing radiation for the surgeon and OR staff. Future studies will help to modify imaging protocols in IG to also minimize patients’ radiation exposure.

How widespread IG ultimately becomes in spine surgery will be based on balancing improvements in surgical accuracy (and resultant improvements in clinical outcomes) with concerns over cost, efficiency, and radiation exposures. Our personal experience has shown the technology to be both efficient and cost-effective by reducing screw revision rates and reducing occupational radiation exposures. Further research is needed to clarify the answers to these questions and better define the true role of IG in spine surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wood M, Mannion R. A comparison of CT-based navigation techniques for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24(1):E1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wood MJ, Mannion RJ. Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(5):533–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(2):247–55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tian NF, Xu HZ. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(4):895–903.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):E111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Silbermann J, Riese F, Allam Y, Reichert T, Koeppert H, Gutberlet M. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):875–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck M, Mittlmeier T, Gierer P, Harms C, Gradl G. Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(10):1469–77.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(5):606–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Girardi FP, Cammisa Jr FP, Sandhu HS, Alvarez L. The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(5):825–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Larson AN, Santos ER, Polly Jr DW, Ledonio CG, Sembrano JN, Mielke CH, et al. Pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography and 3-dimensional image-guided navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(3):E188–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;203:7–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gang C, Haibo L, Fancai L, Weishan C, Qixin C. Learning curve of thoracic pedicle screw placement using the free-hand technique in scoliosis: how many screws needed for an apprentice? Eur Spine J. 2012;21:1151–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5, 992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(3):370–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(3):235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(2):E56–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Modi H, Suh SW, Song HR, Yang JH. Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique. Int Orthop. 2009;33(2):469–75.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(3):333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick AM, Suk I, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):170–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karapinar L, Erel N, Ozturk H, Altay T, Kaya A. Pedicle screw placement with a free hand technique in thoracolumbar spine: is it safe? J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(1):63–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Winter RB. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(11):1519–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(18):2049–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavalleé S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yson SC, Sembrano JN, Sanders PC, Santos ER, Ledonio CG, Polly Jr DW. Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(4):E251–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Watkins RG, Gupta A, Watkins RG. Cost-effectiveness of image-guided spine surgery. Open Orthop J. 2010;6(4):228–33.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot. 2008;28(2):161–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bindal RK, Glaze S, Ognoskie M, Tunner V, Malone R, Ghosh S. Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(6):570–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(20):2637–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(5):532–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Izadpanah K, Konrad G, Südkamp NP, Oberst M. Computer navigation in balloon kyphoplasty reduces the intraoperative radiation exposure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(12):1325–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Patient exposure and associated radiation risks from fluoroscopically guided vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Radiology. 2004;232(3):701–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. O’Toole MD, MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alahmadi, H., O’Toole, J.E. (2014). Image Guidance. In: Phillips, F., Lieberman, I., Polly, D. (eds) Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5674-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5674-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5673-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5674-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics