Free Space Optical Wireless Network

Chapter
Part of the Optical Networks book series (OPNW, volume 15)

Abstract

Fiber network architecture building blocks can be applied to create “free-space optical wireless network” over the atmosphere with vastly improved and disruptive characteristics for urban and suburban accesses. The prime application will be terrestrial over short distances such as between top of buildings in a densely populated city, but aircraft to ground or satellites and satellites to ground are also possibilities. Communications over rain, fog, and snow are feasible for short but interesting ranges, up to four times the optical depth (or visibility) of the channel. Thus, availability of ranges of around 1 km is high for the 1.5 μm telecom band (to the point of near all weather), and with additional developments in longer infrared wavelengths (e.g., 3.2 μm) that yield longer optical depths, ranges over foul weather can be extended. For both clear and foul weather, atmospheric turbulence impairs transmission and must be properly dealt with. Temperature fluctuations give rise to many random “weak” lenses, and the resulting diffraction effect causes “hot” and “cold” spots of the optical field in the receiving plane. The receiver aperture typically only collects a small area of that field. Hence, it is not uncommon for the link to suffer dropouts of 10–20 dB for 0.1–100 mS every 0.1–1 S. At high data rates, these dropouts represent a large number of bits. Coding and interleaving are possible as a mitigation technique, but at the expense of very long delays, and thus will not work well with typical transport layer protocols such as TCP, leading to serious throughput loss (up to 99 %). Thus, the telecom-based communication network architecture must be modified to deal with this serious impairment to realize a usable system. The channel can be abstractly modeled as an “on–off” channel. When the received power level is high enough for the receiver to demodulate with low error probability, the channel is considered “on.” When fades due to turbulence are deep and the receiver can no longer demodulate with high reliability, the channel is “off.” A two-state continuous parameter Markov Process can be used to characterize the channel with its transition rates given by the strength of the turbulence and the transverse wind velocity blowing the turbules across the channel. These channel fades will not yield satisfactory performance for any serious network usages, and especially when used as part of a short-range open air high-speed (large delay-bandwidth product) edge network interconnected to the wired Internet. In the Physical Layer, transmitter and receiver diversities can be used to reduce the length, duration, and frequency of occurrence of the fades are possible mitigation techniques. Small, low cost optics can be used in transmitter and receiver arrays with the elements spaced more than an intensity and phase coherence length apart (typically 1–20 cm). For strong turbulence, which occurs frequently during day time, additional innovations in higher layers of the network are needed. In the network layer, when the network is multiply connected, multipath routing will increase reliability at the expense of some network throughput. Since this technique couples the resources of the link layer and the network layer, this chapter explores network connection topologies with maximum number of independent paths for the same array sizes of the transmitter and receiver arrays to maximize path diversity performance. Innovations in the transport layer are also needed. Unless great expense is invested in many diversity paths, there will still be occasional residual dropouts. If TCP is used, as in most applications over the Internet, it will interpret these dropouts as congestions at the routers and trigger “window-closing” and “slow-start” resulting in devastating effects on network throughput. A new mechanism must be used in the transport layer to differentiate fading from router congestion and embedded in the ARQ protocol. There will be the necessity for an integrated physical layer to transport layer architecture.

Keywords

Microwave Coherence Expense Hunt Huygens 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research partially supported by DARPA and ONR and the manuscript is a much expanded version of [13].

References

  1. 1.
    Chan VWS (2006) Free-space optical communications. J Lightwave Technol 24(12):4750–4762 (Invited paper)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan VWS (2003) Optical satellite networks. J Lightwave Technol 21(11):2811–2827 (Invited)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan VWS (2000) Optical space communications. IEEE J Sel Topics Quantum Electron 6(6):959–975 (Millennium Issue; Invited)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan VWS (1987) Space coherent optical communication systems—an introduction. J Lightweight Technol LT-5(4):633–637 (Invited)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee EJ, Chan VWS (2004) Part 1: Optical communication over the clear turbulent atmospheric channel using diversity. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun Opt Commun Netw 22(9):1896–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan VWS (1982) Coding for the turbulent atmospheric optical channel. IEEE Trans Commun COM-30(1)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee E, Chan VWS (2007) Performance of diversity coherent and diversity incoherent receivers for optical communication over the clear turbulent atmosphere in the presence of an interferer. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on optics and photonics, August 2007, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee E, Chan VWS (2007) Diversity coherent receivers for optical communication over the clear turbulent atmosphere. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC 2007), Glasgow, pp 2485–2492Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee E, Chan VWS (2005) Performance of the transport layer protocol for diversity communication over the clear turbulent atmospheric optical channel. In: Proceedings 2005 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp 333–339, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shin E, Chan VWS (2002) Optical communication over the turbulent atmospheric channel using spatial diversity. In: IEEE GLOBECOM 2002, vol 3, Taipei, pp 2055–2060Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Puryear A, Chan VWS (2009) Optical communication through the turbulent atmosphere with transmitter and receiver diversity, wavefront predistortion, and coherent detection. In: IEEE Globecom, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Puryear A, Chan VWS (2010) Optical communication over atmospheric turbulence with limited channel state information at the transmitter. In: IEEE Globecom, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan VWS (2011) Free space optical networks. In: WOCC, Newark, April 2011, and ICTON, Stockholm, July 2011Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallager R (2012) Discrete stochastic processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wen Y, Chan VWS (2005) Ultra-reliable communications over vulnerable all-optical networks via lightpath diversity. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun Opt Commun Netw 23(8):1572–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chan VWS, Chan AH (1997) Reliable message delivery via unreliable networks. In: IEEE international symposium on information theory (MS-12104), Ulm, 29 June–4 July 1997Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Claude E. Shannon Communication and Network Group, Research Laboratory of ElectronicsMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations