Skip to main content

Terrorism and the Public: Gender, Public Opinion, and Voting Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Terrorism and Violent Conflict

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science ((BRIEFSPOLITICAL,volume 8))

  • 1160 Accesses

Abstract

In early 2004, it looked as if the political Right in Spain, the Popular Party (Partido Popular, PP), was poised to win national reelection, with public opinion polls showing a six-point margin over the Spanish Socialist Worker’s Party (PSOE). Prime Minister José María Aznar, leader of the PP, was in part popular with voters because he cracked down on ETA and banned its political party wing, Batasuna. Everything changed 3 days before the election on March 11 when the country was turned on its head by the largest terrorist attack on Spanish soil, the Madrid train bombings, which killed 191 people and wounded 1,800. Public opinion, influenced by the attack, quickly turned as the Spanish public rallied behind PSOE leader, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, who had run on a platform to remove Spanish troops from Iraq. While Prime Minister Aznar originally blamed the attack on ETA, it actually had been the work of Al Qaeda affiliates who stated they targeted Spain because of its involvement in the Iraq War. The Spanish public, already in favor of troop removal, threw support behind the candidate who had promised to remove Spanish troops from Iraq if elected. The Socialists handily won the election with a five-point win over the PP, marking an 11-point swing in 3 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramowitz, A. I. (2004). Terrorism, gay marriage, and incumbency: Explaining the republican victory in the 2004 presidential election. The Forum, 2(4), article 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afzal, M. (2012). Are the better educated less likely to support militancy and terrorism? Women are. Evidence from a Public Opinion Survey in Pakistan. Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. (2010). The study of electoral behavior. In J. Leighley (Ed.), The oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrebi, C., & Klor, E. (2008). Are voters sensitive to terrorism? Direct evidence from the Israeli electorate. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, M. (2004). Palestinian suicide bombing: Public support, market share and outbidding. Political Science Quarterly, 119(1), 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, M. W., & Decker, G. (2008). Why the U.S. should gender its counterterrorism strategy. Military Review, 88(4), 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, B. (2012). Men and Women’s Support for War: Accounting for the gender gap in public opinion. http://www.e-ir.info/2012/01/19/men-and-womens-support-for-war-accounting-for-the-gender-gap-in-public-opinion/. Accessed 26 July 2012.

  • Criado, H. (2011). Bullets and Votes: Public opinion and terrorist strategies. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, C. C. (2008). Who are Pakistan’s militants and their families? Terrorism and Political Violence, 20, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair, C., & Shepherd, B. (2006). Who supports terrorism? Evidence from fourteen Muslim countries. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29, 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, E. (2004, October 7). The Myth of security moms. The Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/10/07/the_myth_of_security_moms/. Accessed 15 July 2012.

  • Grewel, I. (2006). “Security Moms” in the early twentieth-century United States: The gender of security in neoliberalism. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 34(1/2), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grounds, J. (2008). Gender and voting behavior. In K. Warren (Ed.), Encyclopedia of U.S. campaigns, elections, and electoral behavior (pp. 274–277). Thousand Oaks: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (2008). Understanding terrorism and political violence: The life cycle of birth, growth, transformation, and demise. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, K. M. (2006). The gender gap. Political Science and Politics. Political Behavior, 24, 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibris, A. (2010). Funerals and elections: The effects of terrorism on voting behavior in Turkey. Istanbul: Sabanci University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (2007). What makes a terrorist: Economics and the roots of terrorism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lago, I., & Montero, J. R. (2006). The 2004 election in Spain: Terrorism, accountability and voting. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2(1), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post September 11th Era. Political Research Quarterly, 53(3), 479–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkin, M. (2004, August 20). Candidates ignore security moms at their peril. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-07-20-malkin_x.htm. Accessed 2 February 2012.

  • May, D., Herbert, J., Cline, K., & Nellis, A. (2011). Predictors of fear and risk of terrorism in a rural state. International Journal of Rural Criminology, 1(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2009). Terrorist threat, leadership, and the vote: Evidence from three experiments. Political Behavior, 31(4), 575–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nellis, A. (2009). Gender differences in fear of terrorism. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25(3), 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2012). Issues of the 2012 Campaign. http://www.people-press.org/2012/04/17/section-2-issues-of-the-2012-campaign/. Accessed 18 June 2012.

  • Rosenwasser, S., et al. (1987). Attitudes toward women and men in politics. Political Psychology, 8(2), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. N., & Fair, C. C. (2010). Understanding support for Islamist militancy in Pakistan. International Security, 34(3), 79–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharvit, K., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A., & Gurevich, R. (2010). Ideological orientation and Social Context as Moderators of the effect of terrorism: The case of Israeli-Jewish public opinion regarding peace. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wike, R., & Samaranayake, N. (2006). Where Terrorism Finds Support in the Muslim World: That may depend on how you define it-and who are the targets. Pew Research Center for People and the Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori Poloni-Staudinger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poloni-Staudinger, L., Ortbals, C.D. (2013). Terrorism and the Public: Gender, Public Opinion, and Voting Behavior. In: Terrorism and Violent Conflict. SpringerBriefs in Political Science, vol 8. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5641-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics