Skip to main content

Assessing Wetland-Riparian Amphibian and Reptile Communities of the Mid-Atlantic Region

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mid-Atlantic Freshwater Wetlands: Advances in Wetlands Science, Management, Policy, and Practice

Abstract

The dependency of many amphibian and reptile species on aquatic habitats is well known. Here, we summarize four studies that investigated aspects of herptile life histories and developed models and tools to assess their responses to disturbance and changing environmental conditions. An Amphibian Index of Biological Integrity (AIBI) was developed and tested for amphibian communities found in headwaters of the Ridge and Valley ecoregion of Pennsylvania. The AIBI demonstrated how amphibian species are significantly and negatively affected by changes in land use, and how conserving an intact wetland-riparian corridor is extremely important for maintaining amphibian biodiversity. A study of pond-breeding assemblages of amphibians in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area demonstrated their response to a hydrologic gradient of connectivity. The degree of pond isolation, as defined by hydrologic connectivity, land use, and predator access, significantly impacted these assemblages, and thus, can be used as predictors of amphibian species occurrence. This study confirmed the importance of protecting isolated wetlands in the landscape. A third study investigated the response of the stream-dwelling plethodontid salamanders to acidified conditions caused by atmospheric deposition and acid mine drainage in western Pennsylvania. This study revealed that stream plethodontid abundance, presence, and diversity were severely suppressed in acidified environments. The value of stream salamanders as a bioindicator was confirmed by this and a subsequent study of similar assemblages throughout the Mid-Atlantic Highlands. The final study involved development of a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the federally threatened bog turtle, a wetland-dependent reptile with a stronghold in southeastern Pennsylvania and northwestern Delaware. Teams of investigators from multiple organizations assessed ecological, legal, socioeconomic, and land management factors to arrive at a recommended HCP. A process to locate and operate conservation banks in prime recovery areas was established. Through a system of credit generation, critically important habitats for breeding colonies of bog turtle would be protected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brooks RP, Brinson MM, Havens KJ, Hershner CS, Rheinhardt RD, Wardrop DH, Whigham DF, Jacobs AD, Rubbo JM (2011) Proposed hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands of the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA. Wetlands 31(2):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Bishop JA (2004) Assessing wetland condition on a watershed basis in the Mid-Atlantic region using synoptic land cover maps. Environ Monit and Assess 94:9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Crother BI (ed) (2008) Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North American north of Mexico, 6th edn. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herptological Circular 37, p 1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2011) Status and trends of wetland in the conterminous United State 2004 to 2009. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers R, Buehler DA, Bartlett JB (2002) A test and comparison of wildlife-habitat modelling techniques for predicting bird occurrence at a regional scale. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 607–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr MM (2003) Amphibian assemblage response to anthropogenic disturbance in Pennsylvania wetlands. M.S. Thesis. Wildlife and Fisheries Science. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, p 190

    Google Scholar 

  • Fike J (1999) Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepinstall JA, Krohn WB, Sader SA (2002) Effects of niche width on the performance and agreement of avian habitat models. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 593–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse AC, McCoy CJ, Censky E (2001) Amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania and the Northeast. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, p 419

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian JT (2009) Evaluating amphibian occurrence models and the importance of small, isolated wetlands in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreational Area. PhD. Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, p 181

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemens MW (1993) Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut. Bulletin No. 112. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, Connecticut, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Klute DS, Lovallo MJ, Tzilkowski WM (2002) Autologistic regression modeling of American woodcock habitat use with spatially dependent data. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson MG, Sauer JR, Olsen DA, Mossman MJ, Hemesath LM, Lannoo MJ (1999) Effect of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A. Conserv Biol 13:1437–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolozsvary MB, Swihart RK (1999) Habitat fragtmentation and the distribution of amphibians: patch and landscape correlates in farmland. Can J Zool 77:1288–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GD, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy CJ (1989) The amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania wetlands: an ecological survey. Pages 171–182. In: Majumdar SK, Brooks RP, Benner FJ, Tiner RW (eds) Wetlands ecology and conservation: emphasis in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Easton, PA, p 395

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly GB, Hillis DM, Cannatella DC (2009) Taxonomic freedom and the role of official lists of species names. Herpetologica 65:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada. The Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer LL (1991) Pennsylvania amphibians and reptiles. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Harrisburg, PA, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiner SA, Simons TR, Farnsworth GL (2002) A GIS-based habitat model for wood thrush, Hylocichia mustelina, in Great Smokey mountains National Park. In: Scott JM (ed) Predicting species occurrences; issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 529–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder CD, Julian JT, Young AJ, King TL (2005) Assessment of Ambystomatid salamander populations and their breeding habitats in Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area. Report submitted to National Park Service, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki N, Olson DH, Reilly EC (2008) Developing landscape habitat models for rare amphibians with small geographic ranges: a case study of Siskiyou Mountains salamanders in the western USA. Biodivers Conserv 17:2197–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW (2005) In search of swampland: a wetland sourcebook and field guide, 2nd edn. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, p 330

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James T. Julian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Julian, J.T., Rocco, G., Turner, M.M., Brooks, R.P. (2013). Assessing Wetland-Riparian Amphibian and Reptile Communities of the Mid-Atlantic Region. In: Brooks, R., Wardrop, D. (eds) Mid-Atlantic Freshwater Wetlands: Advances in Wetlands Science, Management, Policy, and Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5596-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics