The “Transitional Citizen”: Civil Society, Political Agency and Hopes for Transitional Justice in Bosnia–Herzegovina

  • Briony JonesEmail author
  • Alex Jeffrey
  • Michaelina Jakala
Part of the Springer Series in Transitional Justice book series (SSTJ)


Over the past 5 years there has been a concerted effort by the newly-established Court of Bosnia–Herzegovina to build its legitimacy within local communities through processes of public outreach and civil society capacity building. Although particular understandings of the “transitional citizen” are implied within such activities they have, to date, been left under explored in the literature on transitional justice and Bosnia–Herzegovina. However, the way in which political subjectivity is understood and is shaped at times of transition is fundamentally important for understanding how transitional justice is practiced. Thus this chapter will address a significant yet underexplored aspect of transitional justice: that of its citizen. We know from transitional justice scholars amongst others that the fostering of civic virtues, trust and behaviours are seen as vital for supporting transition towards democracy in post-war societies (de Greiff, 2008). This is the anticipated political community in reference to which reconciliation is enacted and over which it is assumed a consensus can and will develop. We suggest that there is a need to examine in detail this dynamic, both theoretically and empirically. This chapter draws on qualitative fieldwork undertaken by the three authors in both independent and collaborative projects between 2009 and 2011 in BiH to examine the type/s of citizen and political subjectivity that have emerged through processes of public outreach and civil society capacity building. This argument challenges a vision of the transitional citizen as a passive recipient of new legal or political programmes and illustrates the emergence of alternative understandings of justice and democracy through public outreach programmes.


Civil Society Social Assistance Civil Society Organisation Transitional Justice Civic Virtue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adejumobi, S. 2001. Citizenship, rights and the problem of conflicts and civil wars in Africa. Human Rights Quarterly 23(1): 148–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akanji, O.O. 2011. Researching conflict in Africa: A researcher’s account of Ife-Modakeke, South-Western Nigeria. In Researching violence in Africa: Ethical and methodological challenges, ed. C. Cramer, L. Hammond, and J. Potter, 23–174. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amnesty International. 2009. Whose justice? The Women of Bosnia and Herzegovina are Still Waiting. London: Amnesty International. 2009. Accessed 5 November 2010.
  4. Bajrović, R. 2005. BiH municipalities and the EU: Direct participation of citizens in policy-making at the local level. Sarajevo: Open Society Fund.Google Scholar
  5. Buckley-Zistal, S. 2006. Dividing and uniting: The use of citizenship discourse in conflict and reconciliation in Rwanda. Global Society 20: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, C., and C. Turner. 2008. Utopia and the Doubters: Truth, transition and the law. Legal Studies 28(3): 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Grieff, P. 2008. Justice and reparations. In The handbook of reparations, ed. P. De Grieff, 436. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Delpla, I. 2007. In the midst of injustice: The ICTY from the perspective of some victims associations. In The new Bosnian mosaic: Identities, memories and moral claims in a post-war society, ed. X. Bougarel, E. Helms, and G. Duijzings, 2007. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Domi, T. 2002. Advancing women’s political rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Harriman Review 14(1–2): 36–46.Google Scholar
  10. European Community. 1993. European community investigative mission into the treatment of Muslim women in the former Yugoslavia: Report to European Community Foreign Ministers, U.N. SCOR, Annex I, U.N. Doc. S/25240 (1993).Google Scholar
  11. Fagan, A. 2005. Civil society in Bosnia ten years after Dayton. International Peacekeeping 12: 406–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faulks, K. 2000. Citizenship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Fischer, M. 2006. Introduction: Moving out of the Dayton era into the era of Brussels? In Peacebuilding and civil society in Bosnia-Herzegovina ten years after Dayton, ed. M. Fischer. Berlin: Lit.Google Scholar
  14. Gibney, M. 2006. Who should be included? Non-citizens, conflict and the constitution of the citizenry. CRISE Working Paper 17. Accessed 10 January 2012.
  15. Greback, K., and E. Zillen. 2003. Endangering the peace process: A study on the Dayton accords. Ottawa: United Nations Division on the Advancement of Women. EMG/Peace/2003/EP.2.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, J. 2004. Citizenship beyond the state. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Human Rights Ombudsman BiH. 2010. Special report on the rights of persons with disabilities. Sarajevo: Human Rights Ombudsman BiH. Accessed 10 January 2012.
  18. Ilif, F. et al. 2011. Adverse consequences of reparations. Colchester: Essex Transitional Justice Network, University of Essex. Accessed 1 November 2011.
  19. ICMP. 2007a. Guide for civilian victims of war: How to enjoy the right to protection as a civilian victim of war in the federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo: ICMP. Accessed 3 November 2011.
  20. ICMP. 2007b. Guide for civilian victims of war: How to enjoy the right to protection as a civilian victim of war in the Republika Srpska. Sarajevo: ICMP. Accessed 3 November 2011.
  21. Initiative Group of ‘For Dignity of the Survivors’. 2006. Proposal for amendments to draft law on amendments to law on basic social protection measures, protection of civilian victims of war and protection of families with children of march 2006. Sarajevo: Initiative Group of ‘For Dignity of the Survivors’. Accessed 10 January 2012.
  22. Ivanišević, B. (2008). The war crimes chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From hybrid to domestic court. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. Accessed 20 October 2011.
  23. Jakala, M. 2010. Wartime rape: War’s worst experience? a feminist grounded theory study of female non-raped and wartime rape survivors in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bradford, Bradford.Google Scholar
  24. Jeffrey, A. 2007. The geopolitical framing of localized struggles: NGOs in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Development and change 38: 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeffrey, A. 2011. The political geographies of transitional justice. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36(3): 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, B. 2009. Examining reconciliation’s citizen: Insights from the multi-ethic district of Brčko, Bosnia-Herzegovina. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester, Manchester.Google Scholar
  27. Kabeer, N. 2005. Introduction: The search for inclusive citizenship, meanings and expressions in an interconnected world. In Inclusive citizenship, meanings and expressions, ed. N. Kabeer, 1–27. London: ZED.Google Scholar
  28. Lambourne, W. 2012. Outreach, inreach and civil society participation in transitional justice. In Critical perspectives in transitional justice, ed. Phil Clark et al. Intersentia: Antwerp.Google Scholar
  29. Lister, R. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Mamdani, M. 2001. When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McEvoy, K., and L. McGregor (eds.). 2008a. Transitional justice from below: Grassroots activism and the struggle for change. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  32. McEvoy, K., and L. McGregor. 2008b. Transitional justice from below: An agenda for research, policy and praxis. In Transitional justice from below: Grassroots activism and the struggle for change, ed. K. McEvoy and L. McGregor. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  33. McEvoy, K. 2008. Letting go of legalism: Developing a ‘thicker’ version of transitional justice. In Transitional justice from below: Grassroots activism and the struggle for change, ed. K. McEvoy and L. McGregor, 15–45. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  34. Mujkić, A. 2008. We the citizens of Ethnopolis. Sarajevo: Centar za Ljudska Prava Universiteta Sarajevu.Google Scholar
  35. Nettlefield, L. 2010. Courting democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal’s impact on the Postwar State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Newman, E. 2002. Transitional justice: The impact of transnational norms and the UN. In Recovering from civil conflict: Reconciliation, peace and development, ed. E. Newman and A. Schnabel, 31–50. Portland: Cass.Google Scholar
  37. OHR (2004). War crimes chamber project: Project implementation plan registry progress report. Sarajevo: OHR. Accessed 18 November 2011.
  38. OSCE (2011). Delivering justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina: An overview of war crimes processing from 2005 to 2010. Sarajevo: OSCE. Accessed 20 October 2011.
  39. Ó Tuathail, G., and J. O’ Loughlin. 2009. After ethnic cleansing: Return outcomes in Bosnia-Herzegovina a decade beyond war. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99(5): 1045–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Popić, L., and Panjeta, B. 2010. Compensation, transitional justice and conditional international credit in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attempts to reform government payments to victims and veterans of the 1992–1995 War. Sarajevo: Norwegian Embassy. Accessed 13 November 2011.
  41. Porter, N. 2003. The elusive quest: Reconciliation in northern Ireland. Belfast: Blackstaff.Google Scholar
  42. Rangelov, I., and Theros, M. (2009). Maintaining the process in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Coherence and complementarity of EU institutions and civil society in the field of transitional justice. Bonn: Working Group on Development and Peace. Accessed 4 January 2012.
  43. Sejfija, I. 2006. From the “civil sector” to civil society? Progress and prospects. In Peacebuilding and civil society in Bosnia-Herzegovina ten years after Dayton, ed. M. Fischer. Berlin: Lit.Google Scholar
  44. Shaw, R., L. Waldorf, and P. Hazan. 2010. Localizing transitional justice: Interventions and priorities after mass violence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sriram, C.L. 2009. Transitional Justice and the Liberal Peace. In New perspectives on liberal peacebuilding, ed. R. Newman, R. Paris, and O.P. Richmond, 112–130. Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Transition Council. 2011. Medium-term institutional development plan for the court and prosecutors office of BiH. BiH: Sarajevo.Google Scholar
  47. TRIAL. 2010. Written information for the examination of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s combined second to fifth periodic reports. Sarajevo: TRIAL. Accessed 10 November 2011.
  48. Van De Merwe, H., V. Baxter, and A.R. Chapman. 2009. Introduction. In Assessing the impact of transitional justice: Challenges for empirical research, ed. H. van de Merwe, V. Baxter, and A.R. Chapman, 1–11. Washington D.C: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zawati, H. 2007. Impunity or immunity: Wartime male rape and sexual torture as a crime against humanity. Torture Journal [online], Vol. 7, No. 1. Accessed 25 October 2011.
  50. Zupan, N. 2007. Facing the past and transitional justice in the countries of the Former Yugoslavia. In Peacebuilding and civil society in Bosnia-Herzegovina, ed. M. Fischer, 2007. Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dealing with the Past Program—swisspeaceBern 7Switzerland
  2. 2.Department of GeographyThe University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.The School of Geography, Politics, and SociologyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations