Skip to main content

How Activists See Civil Society and the Political Elite in Bosnia: Relevance to Prospects of Transitional Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Transitional Justice ((SSTJ))

  • 1294 Accesses

Abstract

The purposes of this chapter are twofold: to explore the representations that NGO members hold concerning two of the main actors in Bosnia–Herzegovina, civil society and the political elite; and to discuss the impact of these representations on the prospects of justice and peace in the country. How are civil society and the political elite perceived in the NGO world? Are they considered legitimate political or moral authorities to promote peace and justice? What are the implications of these representations for transitional justice in BiH? This chapter suggests that these important questions need to be considered to build a contextually grounded, bottom-up approach to transitional justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I spent 5 months in BiH and collected my thoughts and feelings resulting from that experience in a field diary, especially in relation to conversations and interactions with locals. Although this was inspired by the methodology of ethnographic observation, it was limited by my poor knowledge of the language.

  2. 2.

    Before each interview, I briefly explained the purpose of my research as part of my PhD studies at the University of Coimbra (Portugal), and assured interviewees that data would be used solely for the purposes of my research and in an anonymous way. Then, I would ask their permission to record the interview. Interviewees were encouraged to express their personal opinions and hence they may not represent the position of the NGO they are working for.

  3. 3.

    Within the FBiH, I interviewed members of the following NGOs: the International Crisis Group (ICG), Transparency international BiH, Wings of Hope, Nansen Dialogue Center (NDC), Youth Information Agency (OIA), a member of both Scouts of BIH and Youth Press of BIH, a member of the banks’ Syndicate; a Judge working for USAID Justice Sector Development Project II, Sarajevo; a local journalist working for the UNDP; a local journalist working for the Center for Media Development and Analysis; a member of the Association Pravnik and a former member of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in BiH. Within the Republika Srpska I only had time to conduct four interviews, all in Banja Luka: with representatives from the Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly (hCa) Banja Luka, the Centre for Informative Decontamination of Youth, with one local journalist working for Radio Free Europe, and with one of the political advisors for the Office of the High Representative. Given the aims and framework of this study, variables such as age, sex and ethnicity were not considered as a priori categories. The urban focus of the research as well as the imbalance between the number of the interviews in the two entities is acknowledged as constraining the generalization of the results.

  4. 4.

    In the original Bosnian language this saying is: ‘Ne možeš me platiti tako malo, koliko malo ja mogu raditi’. The translation to the English language was made by my interviewee.

  5. 5.

    In 2009, the problem of visa restrictions impeding BiH citizens from travelling to the EU was a prevailing concern.

References

  • Armakolas, Ioannis, and Vossou, Eleni. 2008. Transitional justice in practice: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Beyond. UNISCI Discussion Papers, 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, Roberto. 2001. Civil society and peacebuilding in BIH. Journal of Peace Research 38(2): 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, Florian. 2002. Aid dependency in Bosnian politics and civil society: Failures and successes of post-war peacebuilding in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Croatian International Relations Review, January-June, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, David. 2000. Faking democracy after Dayton, 2nd ed. Pluto Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley-Frolick, K.A. 2009. The European Union and transitional justice: Human rights and post-conflict reconciliation in Europe and Beyond. Paper presented at the Eleventh Biennial International Conference, European Union Studies Association. Los Angeles, CA, 23–25April 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher L.L. & Weinstein, Harvey M. (2004). A world unto itself? The application of the international justice in the former Youguslavia. In Eric Stover and Harvey M. Weinstein (Eds.), My Neighbour, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity (pp. 29–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, Stef. 2006. The privatisation of home and hope: Return, reforms and the foreign intervention in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Dialectical Anthropology 30: 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappler, Stefanie, and Oliver Richmond. 2011. Peacebuilding and culture in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Resistance or emancipation? Security Dialogue 42(3): 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salganik, M.J., and D.D. Heckathorn. 2004. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology 34(1): 193–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti G. 2002. Transitional justice in a new era. Fordham International Law Journal 26(4): 893–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti G. 2003. Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. 2010. Guidance note of the Secretary-General. United Nations approach to transitional justice. http://www.unrol.org/files/TJ_Guidance_Note_March_2010FINAL.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2012.

  • UNDP. 2009. Transitional justices guidebook for Bosnia and Herzegovina: Executive summary. http://www.undp.ba/upload/publications/executive_ENG_WEB.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2010.

  • Weinstein, Harvey M., and Eric Stover (eds.). 2004. My neighbour, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, Natascha. 2006. Facing the past and transitional justice in countries of former Yugoslavia. In Peacebuilding and civil society in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ten years after Dayton, ed. Martina Fischer, 327–342. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunice Castro Seixas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seixas, E.C. (2013). How Activists See Civil Society and the Political Elite in Bosnia: Relevance to Prospects of Transitional Justice. In: Simić, O., Volčič, Z. (eds) Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans. Springer Series in Transitional Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5422-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics