Of Time and the House: the Early Neolithic Communities of the Paris Basin and Their Domestic Architecture

Chapter
Part of the One World Archaeology book series (WORLDARCH)

Abstract

The first Neolithic architectures in the Paris Basin were the Danubian-style longhouses of the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture. These enormous structures were first built about 5100 cal BC in this region and would have dwarfed Mesolithic structures in both size and durability. This chapter focuses on the lifecycle of the longhouse structure, examining in turn what it meant to build, live with and then abandon this type of architecture. Adding a temporal dimension to the study of domestic buildings enlivens static house plans and assists in the investigation of how the house operated as a locus for social memory. The cyclical routines of the agricultural year are considered here alongside the more linear trajectories of community formation and dissolution, in which the longhouse was implicated. The two longhouse cultures found in the Paris Basin, the Rubané Récent du Bassin parisien (RRBP) and the Villeneuve-Saint-Germain (VSG), are compared in order to investigate issues of cultural transformation. It is concluded that building a longhouse was a commitment to the local community on the scale of the human life-time at least, while older houses left to decay in situ became a focus for recalling and connecting with the past.

Keywords

Linearbandkeramik (LBK) Villeneuve-Saint-Germain (VSG) Paris Basin Longhouse Lifecycle 

References

  1. Allard, P. 2007. The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in the Paris Basin: a review. In Going over: the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in north-west Europe, eds. A. Whittle and V. Cummings, 211–223. London: British Academy.Google Scholar
  2. Allard, P., J. Dubouloz, L. Hachem, M. Ilett and B. Robert. 1995. Berry-au-Bac ‘Le Vieux Tordoir’: la fin d’un grand sauvetage et la fouille d’un nouveau site rubané. Les fouilles protohistoriques dans la vallée de l’Aisne 23:11–95.Google Scholar
  3. Amit, V. ed. 2002. Realizing community: concepts, social relationships and sentiments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, D. 1990. The living house: signifying continuity. In The social archaeology of houses, ed. R. Samson, 19–48. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bánffy, E. 2000. The late Starčevo and the earliest Linear Pottery groups in western Transdanubia. Documenta Praehistorica 27:173–185.Google Scholar
  6. Bánffy, E. 2005. The Early Neolithic settlement at Szentgyörgyvölgy-Piteryerdomb. Antaeus 28:175–216.Google Scholar
  7. Barrett, J. C. 2006. A perspective on the early architecture of western Europe. In Constructing power? Architecture, ideology and social practice, eds. J. Maran, C. Juwig, H. Schwengel and U. Thaler, 15–30. Hamburg: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Bedault, L. 2012. L’exploitation des ressources animales dans la société du Néolithique ancien du Villeneuve-Saint-Germain en Bassin Parisien: synthèse des données archéozoologiques. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Université de Paris 1—Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  9. Bedault, L. and L. Hachem. 2008. Recherches sur les sociétés du Néolithique danubien à partir du Bassin parisien: approche structurelle des données archéozoologiques. In Fin des traditions danubiennes dans le Néolithique du Bassin parisien et de la Belgique (5100–4700 av. J.-C.), eds. L. Burnez-Lanotte, M. Ilett and P. Allard, 221–243. Paris: Société Préhistorique Française.Google Scholar
  10. Bender, B. 2002. Time and landscape. Current Anthropology 43:S103–S112.Google Scholar
  11. Bentley, R. A. and C. Knipper. 2005. Transhumance at the Early Neolithic settlement at Vaihingen, Germany. Antiquity 79: online project gallery. http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/bentley306/. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.
  12. Bickle, P. 2008. The life and death of the longhouse: daily life during and after the Early Neolithic in the river valleys of the Paris Basin. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
  13. Bickle, P. and D. Hofmann. 2007. Moving on: the contribution of isotope studies to the Early Neolithic of central Europe. Antiquity 81:1029–1041.Google Scholar
  14. Bickle, P., D. Hofmann, R. A. Bentley, R. Hedges, J. Hamilton, F. Laiginhas, G. Nowell, D. G. Pearson, G. Grupe and A. Whittle. 2011. Community heterogeneity in the Linearbandkeramik: isotope evidence in its archaeological context at Aiterhofen. Antiquity 85:1243–1258.Google Scholar
  15. Bloch, M. 1998. How we think they think: anthropological approaches to cognition, memory and literacy. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  16. Boelicke, U. 1982. Gruben und Häuser: Untersuchungen zur Struktur bandkeramischer Hofplätze. In Siedlungen der Kultur mit Linearkeramik in Europa: Kollquium Nové Vozokany 1981, ed. J. Pavúk, 17–28. Nitra: Archäologisches Institut der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  17. Boelicke, U., K. H. Deutmann, J. Lüning, F. W. V. Schmidt and P. Stehli. 1997. Der bandkeramische Siedlungsplatz Aldenhoven 3, Kr. Düren. In Studien zur neolithischen Besiedlung der Aldenhovener Platte und ihrer Umgebung, ed. J. Lüning, 1–130. Köln: Rheinland-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Bogaard, A. 2004. Neolithic farming in central Europe: an archaeobotanical study of crop husbandry practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Bogaard, A., R. Krause and H.-C. Strien. 2011. Towards a social geography of cultivation and plant use in an early farming community: Vaihingen an der Enz, south-west Germany. Antiquity 85:395–416.Google Scholar
  20. Bogucki, P. 1988. Forest farmers and stockherders: early agriculture and its consequences in north-central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Boiron, L. 2007. Analyse spatiale du site de Bucy-le-Long ‘la Fosselle’ (Aisne). In Sociétés néolithiques: des faits archéologiques aux fonctionnements socio-économiques, ed. M. Besse, 303–308. Lausanne: Cahiers d’Archéologie Romande.Google Scholar
  22. Boivin, N. 2000. Life rhythms and floor sequences: excavating time in rural Rajasthan and Neolithic Çatalhöyük. World Archaeology 31:367–388.Google Scholar
  23. Borić, D. 2007. The house between grand narrative and microhistory: a house society in the Balkans. In The durable house: house society models in archaeology, ed. R. A. Beck, 97–129. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  24. Borić, D. 2008. First households and ‘house societies’ in European prehistory. In Prehistoric Europe: theory and practice, ed. A. Jones, 109–142. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Bostyn, F. ed. 2003. Néolithique ancien en Haute-Normandie: le village Villeneuve-Saint-Germain de Poses ‘Sur la Mare’ et les sites de la boucle du Vaudreuil. Paris: Société Préhistorique Française.Google Scholar
  26. Bostyn F. and Y. Lanchon. 2007. Sériation chronologique et analyse spatiale dans la culture de Villeneuve-Saint-Germain: les exemples du village de Poses (Eure, France) et de la basse vallée de la Marne. In Relations interrégionales au Néolithique entre Bassin parisien et Bassin rhénan. Archaeologia Mosellana 7, eds. F. Le Brun-Ricalens, F. Valotteau and A. Hauzeur, 209–227. Luxembourg: Fr. Faber.Google Scholar
  27. Bostyn, F., L. Hachem and Y. Lanchon. 1991. Le site néolithique de ‘La Pente du Croupeton’ à Jablines (Seine-et-Marne): premiers resultats. In La région centre: carrefour d’influences? Actes du XVème colloque interrégional sur le Néolithique, ed. J. Despriée, 45–82. Châlons-sur-Marne: Éditions Associations Régionale pour la Protection et l’Étude du Patrimoine Préhistorique.Google Scholar
  28. Bostyn, F., S. Gaudefroy and F. Vangele. 1996. Pontpoint, Le Fond de Rambourg II—Les Hautes Lanternes—Les Prés de l’Eglise. Bilan Scientifique Picardie 1996:75–77.Google Scholar
  29. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice (translated by R. Nice, first published 1972). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Bourdieu, P. 1990. A logic of practice (translated by R. Nice, first published 1980). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Bradley, R. 1996. Long houses, long mounds and Neolithic enclosures. Journal of Material Culture 1:211–238.Google Scholar
  32. Bradley, R. 2001. Orientations and origins: a symbolic dimension of the long house in Neolithic Europe. Antiquity 75:50–56.Google Scholar
  33. Bradley, R. 2002. The past in prehistoric societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Brück, J. 1999. Houses, lifecycles and deposition on middle Bronze Age settlements in southern England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65:1–22.Google Scholar
  35. Carré, H. 1991. Le Mésolithique dans l’Yonne. In Mésolithique et Néolithisation en France et dans les régions limitrophes (Actes du 113ème Congrès national des Sociétés savantes, Strasbourg, 5–9 Avril 1988), ed. A. Thévenin, 389–401. Paris: Centre des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques.Google Scholar
  36. Carsten, J. ed. 2000. Cultures of relatedness. New approaches to the study of kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Carsten, J. and S. Hugh-Jones. 1995. Introduction: about the house—Lévi-Strauss and beyond. In About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond, eds. J. Carsten and S. Hugh-Jones, 1–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Casey, E. 2000. Remembering: a phenomenological study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Cladders, M. and H. Stäuble. 2003. Das 53. Jahrhundert v. Chr.: Aufbruch und Wandel. In Archäologische Perspektiven. Analysen und Interpretationen im Wandel. Festschrift für Jens Lüning zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. J. Eckert, U. Eisenhauer and A. Zimmermann, 491–503. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
  40. Constantin, C. 1995. Étude de la répartition spatiale du matériel: analyse spatiale intrabâtiments. In Le site néolithique de Berry-au-Bac ‘Le Chemin de la Pêcherie’, eds. M. Ilett and M. Plateaux, 144–156. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  41. Coudart, A. 1998. Architecture et société néolithique: l’unité et la variance de la maison danubienne. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de L’Homme.Google Scholar
  42. Coudart, A. in press. The Bandkeramik longhouses: a material, social, and mental metaphor for small-scale sedentary societies. In The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe, eds. C. Fowler, J. Harding and D. Hofmann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Currie, M. 2004. Difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Dietler, M. and I. Herbich. 1998. Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In The archaeology of social boundaries, ed. M. T. Stark, 231–263. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  45. Delor, J.-P. 1996. Les villages néolithiques de Gurgy ‘les Plantes du Mony’ (Yonne): particularités architecturales et aménagements environnementaux. In La Bourgogne entre les bassins rhénan, rhodanien et parisien—carrefour ou frontière? ed. P. Duhamel, 295–305. (Revue Archéologique du Centre, Supplement 14).Google Scholar
  46. DeSilvey, C. 2006. Observed decay: telling stories with mutable things. Journal of Material Culture 11:318–338.Google Scholar
  47. Dubouloz, J. 2003. Datation absolue du premier Néolithique du Bassin parisien: complément et relecture des données RRBP et VSG. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 100:671–689.Google Scholar
  48. Dubouloz, J., M. Le Bolloch and B. Robert. 1995. Historique des fouilles: les fouilles anciennes sur la commune de Berry-au-Bac. In Le site néolithique de Berry-au-Bac ‘Le Chemin de la Pêcherie’, eds. M. Ilett and M. Plateaux, 23–38. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  49. Dubouloz, J, J.-P. Farruggia, M. Ilett and B. Robert. 2000. Bâtiments néolithiques non-rubanés à Berry-au-Bac ‘Le Vieux-Tordoir’, Aisne: Presentation preliminaire. Interneo 1:51–69.Google Scholar
  50. Evans, J. 2003. Environmental archaeology and the social order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Frirdich, C. 1994. Kulturgeschichtliche Betrachtungen zur Bandkeramik im Merzbachtal. In Die Bandkeramik im Merzbachtal auf der Aldenhovener Platte, eds. J. Lüning and P. Stehli, 207–393. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
  52. Gell, A. 1992. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Providence: Berg.Google Scholar
  53. Gerritsen, F. 1999. To build and to abandon. The cultural biography of late prehistoric houses and farmsteads in the southern Netherlands. Archaeological Dialogues 6:78–114.Google Scholar
  54. Gerritsen, F. 2008. Domestic times: houses and temporalities in late prehistoric Europe. In Prehistoric Europe: theory and practice, ed. A. Jones, 143–161. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Gombau, V. 1997. Les sépultures du groupe néolithique du Villeneuve-Saint-Germain dans le Bassin parisien. In Le Néolithique danubien et ses marges entre Rhin et Seine, ed. C. Jeunesse, 65–79. Strasbourg: Cahiers de l’Association pour la Promotion de la Recherche Archéologique en Alsace.Google Scholar
  56. Gosden, C. 1994. Social being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Grasseni, C. 2009. Developing skill, developing vision: practices of locality at the foot of the Alps. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  58. Gregor, T. 1977. Mehinaku: the drama of daily life in a Brazilian Indian village. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  59. Grinker, R. R. 1994. Houses in the rainforest: ethnicity and inequality among farmers and foragers in central Africa. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  60. Gronenborn, D. 1999. Variations on a basic theme: the transition to farming in southern central Europe. Journal of World Prehistory 13:123–210.Google Scholar
  61. Hachem, L. 1997. Structuration spatiale d’un village du Rubané récent, Cuiry-lès-Chaudardes (Aisne): analyse d’une catégorie de rejets domestiques: la faune. In Espaces physiques, espaces sociaux dans l’analyse interne des sites du Néolithique à l’Âge du Fer, ed. A. Bocquet, 245–261. Amiens: Centre des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques.Google Scholar
  62. Hachem, L. 2000. New observations on the Bandkeramik house and social organization. Antiquity 74:308–312.Google Scholar
  63. Hachem, L. 2011. Le site néolithique de Cuiry-lès-Chaudardes—I. De l’analyse de la faune à la structuration sociale. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
  64. Hachem, L. and G. Auxiette. 1995. La faune. In Le site Néolithique de Berry-au-Bac ‘Le Chemin de la Pêcherie’, eds. M. Ilett and M. Plateaux, 128–141. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  65. Hachem, L., P. Allard, C. Constantin, J.-P. Farruggia, Y. Guichard and M. Ilett. 1998. Le site néolithique Rubané de Bucy-le-Long ‘La Fosselle’ (Aisne). Internéo 2:17–27.Google Scholar
  66. Halstead, P. 2005. Resettling the Neolithic: faunal evidence for seasons of consumption and residence at Neolithic sites in Greece. In (Un)settling the Neolithic, eds. D. W. Bailey, A. Whittle and V. Cummings, 38–50. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  67. Harris, M. 1998. The rhythm of life: seasonality and sociality in a riverine village. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4:247–272.Google Scholar
  68. Harris, M. 2000. Life on the Amazon: the anthropology of a Brazilian peasant village. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Harris, O. 2010. Emotional and mnemonic geographies at Hambledon Hill: texturing Neolithic places with bodies and bones. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 20:357–371.Google Scholar
  70. Harrison, R. 2004. Shared landscape: archaeologies of attachment and the pastoral industry in New South Wales. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  71. Helliwell, C. 1996. Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. In Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology, ed. M. Jackson, 128–148. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Hodder, I. 1990. The domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  73. Hodder, I. 1994. Architecture and meaning: the example of Neolithic houses and tombs. In Architecture and order: approaches to social space, eds. M. Parker Pearson and C. Richards, 73–86. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Hodder, I. and C. Cessford. 2004. Daily practice and social memory at Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 69:17–40.Google Scholar
  75. Hofmann, D. 2006. Being Neolithic. Life, death and transformation in Neolithic Lower Bavaria. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
  76. Hofmann, D. in prep. Longhouse people. Life, death and transformation in the early Neolithic Linearbandkeramik culture of central Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Hofmann, D. and P. Bickle. 2011. Creating communities: culture, tradition and the settlement burials of the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) culture. In Investigating archaeological cultures. Material culture, variability and transmission, eds. B. W. Roberts and M. Vander Linden, 183–200. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  78. Hugh-Jones, C. 1996. Houses in the Neolithic imagination: an Amazonian example. In Neolithic houses in north-west Europe and beyond, eds. T. Darvill and J. T. Thomas, 185–193. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  79. Husserl, E. 1991. On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (translated by J. Brough, first published 1917). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  80. Ilett, M. and A. Coudart. 1982. Le site néolithique de Cuiry-lès-Chaudardes ‘Les Fontinettes’. Les fouilles protohistoriques dans la vallée de l’Aisne 10:21–56.Google Scholar
  81. Ilett, M. and L. Hachem. 2001. Le village néolithique de Cuiry-lès-Chaudardes (Aisne, France). In Communautés villageoises du Proche-Orient à l’Atlantique (8000–2000 avant notre ère), ed. J. Guilaine, 171–186. Paris: Éditions Errance.Google Scholar
  82. Ilett, M., M. Plateaux and A. Coudart. 1986. Analyse spatiale des habitats du Rubané récent: problèmes actuels. In Le Néolithique de la France, eds. J.-P. Demoule and J. Guilaine, 131–140. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
  83. Ingold, T. 1993. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 25:152–173.Google Scholar
  84. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment. Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Jadin, I. 2007. Datations radiocarbone du Néolithique ancien entre Bassin parisien et Bassin rhénan: prolégomènes théoriques, applications pratiques et après … In Relations interrégionales au Néolithique entre Bassin parisien et Bassin rhénan. Archaeologia Mosellana 7, eds. F. Le Brun-Ricalens, F. Valotteau and A. Hauzeur, 113–129. Luxembourg: Fr. Faber.Google Scholar
  86. James, W. 2003. The ceremonial animal: a new portrait of anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  87. James, W. and D. Mills, 2005. Introduction: from representation to action in the flow of time. In The qualities of time. Anthropological approaches, eds. W. James and D. Mills, 1–15. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  88. Jeunesse, C. 1997. Pratiques funéraires au Néolithique ancien: sépultures et nécropoles danubiennes 5500–4900 av. J. C. Paris: Éditions Errance.Google Scholar
  89. Jeunesse, C. 2000. Les composantes autochtone et danubienne en Europe centrale et occidentale entre 5500 et 4000 av. J.-C.: contacts, transferts, acculturations. In Les derniers chasseurs-cueilleurs d’Europe occidentale (13000–5500 av. J.-C.). Actes du colloque international de Besançon, eds. A. Richard, C. Cupillard, H. Richard and A. Thévenin, 361–378. Besançon: University of Besançon.Google Scholar
  90. Jeunesse, C. 2003. Néolithique ‘initial’, Néolithique ancien et néolithisation dans l’espace centre-européen: une vision rénovée. Revue d’Alsace 129:97–112.Google Scholar
  91. Jeunesse, C. 2009. Le front de colonisation occidental (entre Rhin et Seine) et l’identité rubanée. Rélexion sur le systèmes symboliques dans le Néolithique danubien. In Interactions between different models of neolithization of the central European agro-ecological barrier, ed. J. Kozłowski, 151–176. Krakow: Polska Akademia Umiejetnosci.Google Scholar
  92. Joly, J. 1970. Circonscription de Bourgogne. Gallia Préhistoire 13:411–458.Google Scholar
  93. Jones, A. 2005. Lives in fragments? Personhood and the European Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology 5:193–224.Google Scholar
  94. Jones, A. 2007. Memory and material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Joyce, R. A. and S. D. Gillespie, eds. 2000. Beyond kinship: social and material reproduction in house societies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  96. Kienlin, T. L. and P. Valde-Nowak. 2003. Neolithic transhumance in the Black Forest Mountains, southwest Germany. Journal of Field Archaeology 29:29–44.Google Scholar
  97. Knipper, C. 2009. Mobility in a sedentary society: insights from isotope analysis of LBK human and animal teeth. In Creating communities: new advances in central European research, eds. D. Hofmann and P. Bickle, 142–158. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  98. Knipper, C. 2011. Die räumliche Organisation der linearbandkeramischen Rinderhaltung: naturwissenschaftliche und archäologische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
  99. Kuper, R., H. Löhr, J. Lüning, P. Stehli and A. Zimmerman. 1977. Der bandkeramische Siedlungsplatz Langweiler 9, Gemeinde Aldenhoven, Kreis Düren. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
  100. Last, J. 1998. The residue of yesterday’s existence: settlement space and discard at Miskovice and Bylany. In Bylany: Varia 1, ed. I. Pavlů, 17–45. Prague: Archeologický ústav AV ČR.Google Scholar
  101. Lenneis, E. 2007. Perspectives on the beginning of the earliest LBK in east-central Europe. In Living well together? Settlement and materiality in the Neolithic of south-east and central Europe, eds. D. W. Bailey, A. Whittle and D. Hofmann, 164–178. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  102. Lenneis, E. and J. Lüning. 2001. Die altbandkeramischen Siedlungen von Neckenmarkt und Strögen. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
  103. Lévi-Strauss, C. 1982. The way of the masks (translated by S. Modelski, first published 1972). London: Cape.Google Scholar
  104. Lorimer, H. 2006. Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and planning D: Society and Space 24:497–518.Google Scholar
  105. Louwe Kooijmans, L. P., P. van de Velde and H. Kamermans. 2003. The Bandkeramik settlement of Geleen-Janskamperveld: its intrasite structure and dynamics. In Archäologische Perspektiven, Analysen und Interpretationen im Wandel: Festschrift für Jens Lüning zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. J. Eckert, U. Eisenhauer and A. Zimmermann, 373–397. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
  106. Lucas, G. 2005. The archaeology of time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Lüning, J. 1988. Frühe Bauern in Mitteleuropa im 6. and 5. Jahrtausand v. Chr. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 35:27–93.Google Scholar
  108. Lüning, J. 2005. Bandkeramische Hofplätze und die absolute Chronologie der Bandkeramik. In Die Bandkeramik im 21. Jahrhundert. Symposium in der Abtei Brauweiler bei Köln vom 16.9.–19.9.2002, eds. J. Lüning, C. Frirdich and A. Zimmermann, 49–74. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
  109. Maréchal, D., R.-M. Arbogast, F. Bostyn, B. Clavel, C. Kuhar, E. Pinard and I. Praud. 2007. Vestiges d’un habitat Villeneuve-Saint-Germain dans la moyenne vallée de l’Oise à Longueil-Sainte-Marie (Oise). Camps, enceintes et structures d’habitat néolithiques en France septentrionale. Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France 27(Supplement):55–66.Google Scholar
  110. McFadyen, L. 2007. Making architecture. In Building memories. The Neolithic Cotswold long barrow at Ascott-under-Wychwood, Oxfordshire, eds. D. Benson and A. Whittle, 348–354. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  111. Metcalf, P. 2010. The life of the longhouse: an archaeology of ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Middleton, D. and D. Edwards. 1990. Introduction. In Collective remembering, eds. D. Middleton and D. Edwards, 1–22. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  113. Midgley, M. 2005. Monumental cemeteries of prehistoric Europe. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
  114. Modderman, P. J. R. 1970. Linearbandkeramik aus Elsloo und Stein. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 3:1–217.Google Scholar
  115. Modderman, P. J. R. 1988. The Linear Pottery Culture: diversity in uniformity. Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodermonderzoete 38:63–139.Google Scholar
  116. Mordant, D. 1991. Le site des Réaudins à Balloy (Seine-et-Marne): premiers résultats. In La région centre: carrefour d’influences? Actes du 15ème Colloque Interrégional sur le Néolithique, Châlons-sur-Marne, ed. J. Despriée, 33–43. Châlons-sur-Marne: Éditions Associations Régionale pour la Protection et l’Étude du Patrimoine préhistorique.Google Scholar
  117. Mordant, D. 1997. Sépultures et nécropoles des VIème et Vème millénaires du Bassin Seine-Yonne. In Le Néolithique danubien et ses marges entre Rhin et Seine, ed. C. Jeunesse, 135–155. Strasbourg: Cahiers de l’Association pour la Promotion de la Recherche Archéologique en Alsace.Google Scholar
  118. Mordant, D. and C. Mordant. 1977. Noyen-sur-Seine, habitat néolithique de fond de vallée alluviale. Gallia Préhistoire 20:228–280.Google Scholar
  119. Mordant, D. and C. Mordant. 1992. Noyen-sur-Seine: a Mesolithic waterside settlement. In The wetland revolution in prehistory, ed. B. Coles, 55–64. Exeter: The Prehistoric Society and Wetland Archaeology Research Project.Google Scholar
  120. Overing, J. and A. Passes. 2000. Introduction: conviviality and the opening up of Amazonian anthropology. In The anthropology of love and anger: the aesthetics of conviviality in native Amazonia, eds. J. Overing and A. Passes, 1–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  121. Parker Pearson, M. and C. Richards. 1994. Ordering the world: perceptions of architecture, space and time. In Architecture and order: approaches to social space, eds. M. Parker Pearson and C. Richards, 1–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  122. Pavlů, I. 2000. Life on a Neolithic site: Bylany—Situational analysis of artefacts. Prague: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  123. Pechtl, J. 2009. A monumental prestige patchwork. In Creating communities: new advances in central European Neolithic research, eds. D. Hofmann and P. Bickle, 186–201. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  124. Pechtl, J. in press. Linearbandkeramik pottery and society. In The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe, eds. C. Fowler, J. Harding and D. Hofmann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  125. Prestreau, M. 1992. Le site néolithique et protohistorique des Falaises de Prépoux à Villeneuve-la-Guyard (Yonne). Gallia Préhistoire 34:171–207.Google Scholar
  126. Rival, L. 1998. Trees, from symbols of life and regeneration to political artefacts. In The social life of trees: anthropological perspectives on tree symbolism, ed. L. Rival, 1–36. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  127. Robb, J. and P. Miracle. 2007. Beyond ‘migration’ versus ‘acculturation’: new models for the spread of agriculture. In Going over: the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in north-west Europe, eds. A. Whittle and V. Cummings, 99–115. London: British Academy.Google Scholar
  128. Rozoy, C. and J.-G. Rozoy. 2000. L’Allée Tortue à Fère-en-Tardenois (Aisne): un site mésolithic complexe. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 97:5–56.Google Scholar
  129. Rozoy, C. and J.-G. Rozoy. 2001. Structures comparées des camps de plein-air magdaléniens et mésolithiques dans le nord de la France. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 98:231–244.Google Scholar
  130. Rück, O. 2007. Neue Aspekte und Modelle in der Siedlungsforschung zur Bandkeramik. Die Siedlung Weisweiler 111 auf der Aldenhovener Platte, Kreis Düren. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
  131. Rück, O. 2009. New aspects and models for Bandkeramik settlement research. In Creating communities: new advances in central European Neolithic research, eds. D. Hofmann and P. Bickle, 159–185. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  132. Sayer, D. 2010. Death and the family: developing a generational chronology. Journal of Social Archaeology 10:59–91.Google Scholar
  133. Schmidt, B., Gruhle, W., Rück, O. and Freckmann, K. 2005. Zur Dauerhaftigkeit bandkeramischer Häuser im Rheinland (5300–4950 v. Chr.)—eine Interpretation dendrochronologischer und bauhistorischer Befunde. In Klimaveränderung und Kulturwandel in neolithischen Gesellschaften Mitteleuropas, 6700–2200 v. Chr., ed. D. Gronenborn, 151–170. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum.Google Scholar
  134. Soudský, B., A. Bayle, A. Beeching, A. Biquard, M. Boureux, S. Cleuziou, C. Constantin, A. Coudart, J.-P. Demoule, J.-P. Farruggia and M. Ilett. 1982. L’habitat néolithique et chalcolithique de Cuiry-lès-Chaudardes: les Fontinettes—les Gravelines (1972–1977). Revue Archéologique de Picardie 2(Supplement):57–119.Google Scholar
  135. Sommer, U. 2001. ‘Hear the instruction of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother’: change and persistence in the European Early Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology 1:244–270.Google Scholar
  136. Souvatzi, S. G. 2008. A social archaeology of households in Neolithic Greece: an anthropological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  137. Startin, W. 1978. Linear Pottery Culture houses: reconstruction and manpower. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 44:143–159.Google Scholar
  138. Stäuble, H. and J. Lüning. 1999. Phosphatanalysen in bandkeramischen Häusern. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 29:165–187.Google Scholar
  139. Stehli, P. 1989. Merzbachtal—Umwelt und Geschichte einer bandkermischen Siedlungskammer. Germania 67:51–76.Google Scholar
  140. Strathern, A. and P. J. Stewart. 2000. Dangerous woods and perilous pearl shells: the fabricated politics of a longhouse in Pangia, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Material Culture 5:69–89.Google Scholar
  141. Tringham, R. 2005. Weaving house life and death into places: a blueprint for a hypermedia narrative. In (Un)settling the Neolithic, eds. D. W. Bailey, A. Whittle and V. Cummings, 98–111. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  142. van de Velde, P. 1990. Bandkeramik social inequality—A case study. Germania 68:19–38.Google Scholar
  143. van Vleet, K. E. 2008. Performing kinship: narrative, gender and the intimacies of power in the Andes. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  144. Verjux, C. 2003. The function of the Mesolithic sites in the Paris Basin (France). New data. In Mesolithic on the move. Papers presented at the sixth international conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Stockholm, 2000, eds. L. Larsson, H. Kindgren, K. Knutsson, D. Loeffer and A. Åkerland, 262–268. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  145. von Brandt, D. 1988. Häuser. In Der bandkeramische Siedlungsplatz Langweiler 8, Gemeinde Aldenhoven, Kreis Düren (Rheinische Ausgrabungen), eds. U. Boelicke, D. von Brandt, J. Lüning, P. Stehli and A. Zimmermann, 36–289. Köln: Habelt.Google Scholar
  146. Waterson, R. 1990. The living house: an anthropology of architecture in south-east Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  147. Whittle, A. 1996. Europe in the Neolithic. The creation of new worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  148. Whittle, A. 2003. The archaeology of people. Dimensions of Neolithic life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  149. Whittle, A. 2009. The people who lived in longhouses: what’s the big idea? In Creating communities: new advances in central European Neolithic research, eds. D. Hofmann and P. Bickle, 249–263. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  150. Wolfram, S. 2008. Die verzierte Keramik der bandkeramischen Siedlung Hanau—Klein-Auheim: Taphonomie, Chronologie, Siedlungsentwicklung. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
  151. Zimmerman, A., K. P. Wendt, T. Frank and J. Hilpert. 2009. Landscape archaeology in central Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 75:1–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of History, Archaeology and ReligionCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations