Advertisement

Wisdom, Spirituality, Social Entrepreneurs, and Self-Sustaining Practices: What Can We Learn from Difference Makers?

  • Sandra Waddock
  • Erica Steckler
Chapter

Abstract

We find that a set of pioneering social entrepreneurs, 23 difference makers, are guided by a distinct sense of hope and purpose to implement change and leave the world a better place. This hopeful, difference-making purpose that created meaning in their work and sustained their efforts is characteristic of “spirituality” as encompassed by both secular and non-secular traditions. We suggest that moral imagination, systems understanding, and aesthetic sensibility undergird the spirituality of these difference makers. Further, we elaborate on the specific practices that these difference makers engaged in to create the “spiritual spaces,” or retreats, in which personal sustenance, meaning, and connection were generated, hurdles were overcome, and where inspiration and wisdom emerged. The experience of these social entrepreneurs provides an actionable model for all of us to innovate and solve problems in our everyday lives and for the benefit of humanity by carving out personal retreats that enable us to access and leverage our own spiritual resources.

Keywords

Corporate Responsibility Social Entrepreneurship Mindfulness Practice Social Entrepreneur Moral Imagination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abowitz, K. K. (2007). Moral perception through aesthetics engaging imaginations in educational ethics. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(4), 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackoff, R. L. (1999). On learning and the systems that facilitate it. Reflections, 1(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, N. J. (2006). The arts & leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 486–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adler, N. J. (2011). Leading beautifully: The creative economy and beyond. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(3), 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornstein, D. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Brush, C. G. (2008). Pioneering strategies for entrepreneurial success. Business Horizons, 51, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabrera, D., Colosi, L., & Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carson, S. J., Devinney, T. M., Dowling, G. R., & John, G. (1999). Understanding institutional designs within marketing value systems. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, J., & Holt, R. (2010). Reflective judgment: Understanding entrepreneurship as ethical practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colas, H. (2005). In search of new organizational values: The irruption of beauty in an entrepreneurial creation. Corporate Governance, 5(2), 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crilly, D., Schneider, S., & Zollo, M. (2008). Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior. European Management Review, 5(3): 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Dees, J. G. (1998; rev. 2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Comments and Suggestions Contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Funders Working Group, Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship. Fuqua School of Business: Duke University. www.caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf . 5 pp.
  17. Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elm, D. R., & Taylor, S. S. (2010). Representing wholeness: Learning via theatrical productions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(2), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice : Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Greider, W. (2004). Beyond scarcity: A new story for American capitalism. Journal of Financial Planning, 17(6), 18–18.Google Scholar
  21. Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A.H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henton, D., Melville, J., & Walesh, K. (2004). The rise of the new civic revolutionaries: Answering the call to stewardship in our times. National Civic Review, 93(1), 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henton, D., Melville, J., & Walesh, K. (1997). The age of the civic entrepreneur: Restoring civil society and building economic community. National Civic Review, 86(2), 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. (Ed.) Lickona, T. Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues,. 31–53. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  25. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. New York: Harper & Row Pub.Google Scholar
  26. Kouzes, J. M. & Posner, B. Z. (1995). The leadership challenge: How to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Levy, D. L., Brown, H. S., & de Jong, M. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance: The case of the global reporting initiative. Business & Society, 49(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy, D., & Scully, M. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28(7), 971–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28–39.Google Scholar
  30. McMullan, W. E., & Long, W. 1990. Developing new ventures: the entrepreneurial option. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  31. Nicholls, A. (2006). Social entrepreneurship : New models of sustainable social change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Porras, J. I., & Collins, J. C. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  33. Post, J. E., & Waddock, S. (1989). Social cause partnerships and the “mega-event:” Hunger, homelessness and Hands Across America. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 11, 181–205.Google Scholar
  34. Sandelands, L. E., & Buckner, G. C. (1989). Of art and work: Aesthetic experience and the concept of job satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 11, (Eds.) B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings. 105–132. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schumpeter, J. A., & Opie, R. (1934). The theory of economic development; an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge: Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Senge, P. M. (1990, rev. 2006). The fifth discipline : The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
  37. Simms, M. (2009). Insights from a management prophet: Mary parker follett on social entrepreneurship. Business & Society Review (00453609), 114(3), 349–363.Google Scholar
  38. Steckler, E., & Waddock, S. (2012). How social change agents sustain themselves over time. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  39. Stein, J. (1997). How institutions learn: A socio-cognitive perspective. Journal of Economic Issues (Association for Evolutionary Economics), 31(3), 729.Google Scholar
  40. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1211–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson, J. L. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waddock, S. (2006). Leading corporate citizens : Vision, values, value-added. Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Waddock, S. (2008). The difference makers : How social and institutional entrepreneurs created the corporate responsibility movement. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Pub. Ltd.Google Scholar
  46. Waddock, S. (2009). Pragmatic visionaries: Difference makers as social entrepreneurs. Organizational Dynamics, 38(4), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waddock, S. (2010). Finding wisdom within--the role of seeing and reflective practice in developing moral imagination, aesthetic sensibility, and systems understanding. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 7(1), 177–196.Google Scholar
  48. Waddock, S. (forthcoming). Wisdom and responsible leadership: Aesthetic sensibility, moral imagination, and systems thinking. In D. Koehn, & D. Elm (Eds.), Aesthetics and business ethics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  49. Waddock, S. & Post, J. (1991). Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change. Public Administration Review, 51(5), 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Waddock, S., & Steckler, E. Stumbling into vision: Paths from aspiration to vision or action. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  51. Werhane, P. (2008). Mental models, moral imagination and system thinking in the age of globalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wilber, K. (2007). Integral spirituality: A startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Boston, MA: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  55. Wilber, K. (2001). A theory of everything : An integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Dublin: Gateway.Google Scholar
  56. Wishard, W. (2000). Between two ages: The 21st century and the crisis of meaning. USA: Exlibris.Google Scholar
  57. Witt, U. 2007. Firms as realizations of entrepreneurial visions. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1125–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston College, Carroll School of ManagementChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations