Advertisement

Toxicogenomic Evaluation of Nanomaterials

Chapter

Abstract

The ongoing search for specialty substances with unique physical and chemical properties has motivated the development of numerous types of metal oxide nanomaterials, but concerns remain regarding biological effects of particles that are comparable in size to ultrafine air pollution (d < 100 nm). Much of the nanoparticle toxicological research has been on inhalation and intact-skin dermal exposures. Lung epithelial cells exposed to oxide nanoparticles show diverse responses, most notably upregulation of pro-inflammatory signaling pathways. This chapter addresses potential etiologies, mechanisms, and methodologies for investigating potential unforeseen toxicities of nanoparticles that are likely to occur in skin as nanoproducts become more and more available.

Keywords

Gene Array Single Cell Type Gene Array Study Specialty Substance Activate Cell Signaling Pathway 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Song Y, Li X, Du X. Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):559–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song Y, Tang S. Nanoexposure, unusual diseases, and new health and safety concerns. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1821–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Monteiro-Riviere NA, Wiench K, Landsiedel R, Schulte S, Inman AO, Riviere JE. Safety evaluation of sunscreen formulations containing titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in UVB sunburned skin: an in vitro and in vivo study. Toxicol Sci. 2011;123(1):264–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moos PJ, Olszewski K, Honeggar M, et al. Responses of human cells to ZnO nanoparticles: a gene transcription study. Metallomics. 2011;3(11):1199–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    dos Santos T, Varela J, Lynch I, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Quantitative assessment of the comparative nanoparticle-uptake efficiency of a range of cell lines. Small. 2011;7(23):3341–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen M, von Mikecz A. Formation of nucleoplasmic protein aggregates impairs nuclear function in response to SiO2 nanoparticles. Exp Cell Res. 2005;305(1):51–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sen B, Mahadevan B, DeMarini DM. Transcriptional responses to complex mixtures: a review. Mutat Res. 2007;636(1–3):144–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rouse RL, Murphy G, Boudreaux MJ, Paulsen DB, Penn AL. Soot nanoparticles promote biotransformation, oxidative stress, and inflammation in murine lungs. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;39(2):198–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujita K, Horie M, Kato H, et al. Effects of ultrafine TiO2 particles on gene expression profile in human keratinocytes without illumination: involvement of extracellular matrix and cell adhesion. Toxicol Lett. 2009;191(2–3):109–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inoue K, Takano H, Ohnuki M, et al. Size effects of nanomaterials on lung inflammation and coagulatory disturbance. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008;21(1):197–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waters KM, Masiello LM, Zangar RC, et al. Macrophage responses to silica nanoparticles are highly conserved across particle sizes. Toxicol Sci. 2009;107(2):553–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujita K, Morimoto Y, Ogami A, et al. Gene expression profiles in rat lung after inhalation exposure to C60 fullerene particles. Toxicology. 2009;258(1):47–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H, Pauluhn J. Pulmonary toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Baytubes) relative to alpha-quartz following a single 6 h inhalation exposure of rats and a 3 months post-exposure period. Toxicology. 2009;266(1–3):16–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zollanvari A, Cunningham MJ, Braga-Neto U and Dougherty ER. Analysis and modeling of time-course gene-expression profiles from nanomaterial-exposed primary human epidermal keratinocytes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10 Suppl 11:S10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang Y, Qu Y, Lu X. Global gene expression analysis of the effects of gold nanoparticles on human dermal fibroblasts. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2010;6(3):234–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ma J, Lu X, Huang Y. Genomic analysis of cytotoxicity response to nanosilver in human dermal fibroblasts. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2011;7(2):263–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hughes TR, Marton MJ, Jones AR, et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell. 2000;102(1):109–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prow TW, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Inman AO, et al. Quantum dot penetration into viable human skin. Nanotoxicology. 2012;6(2):173–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xia XR, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Riviere JE. Skin penetration and kinetics of pristine fullerenes (C60) topically exposed in industrial organic solvents. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;242(1):29–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Warheit DB, Webb TR, Reed KL, Frerichs S, Sayes CM. Pulmonary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-TiO2 particles: differential responses related to surface properties. Toxicology. 2007;230(1):90–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of Utah, L.S. Skaggs PharmacySalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyUniversity of Utah, Huntsman Cancer InstituteSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations