Advertisement

Complexity Science in the Future of Behavioral Medicine

  • David Pincus
  • Stephen J. Guastello
Chapter

Abstract

Complexity science offers a new, broader paradigm emerging from the traditional biomedical model of medicine. This new paradigm will inform research and intervention, particularly for the most complex medical conditions such as type-II diabetes (DT2), heart disease, pain, and anxiety-depression spectrum (ADS) disorders. Traditional medical interventions, including those from behavioral medicine, utilize the framework ofdiseaseto understand etiology and treatment. The disease framework is based on the idea that some exogenous agent, such as a germ, intrudes upon an otherwise healthy body and causes illness. Etiological concerns for health care providers are then logically aimed at identifying these disease agents as simple material causes, and treatment is aimed at protecting against their intrusion, mitigating their harmful effects, or removing them from bodily systems where they may cause harm.

Keywords

Behavioral Medicine Nonlinear Dynamical System Complex Adaptive System Transtheoretical Model Complexity Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Von Bertalanffy L. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller; 1968.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. The dynamics of health care reform: learning from a complex adaptive systems theoretical perspective. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010;14:525–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G et al. On behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation: AHA; 2010.169 p. doi:  10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192667.
  4. 4.
    Toth C, Lander J, Wiebe S. The prevalence and impact of chronic pain with neuropathic pain symptoms in the general population. Pain Med. 2009;10:918–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;290:2443–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demier O, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of twelve-month disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:617–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang PS, Simon G, Kessler RC. The economic burden of depression and the cost-effectiveness of treatment. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12:22–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenberg PE, Sisitsky T, Kessler RC, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER, Davidson JR, et al. The economic burden of anxiety disorders in the 1990s. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60:427–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitch K, Iwasaki K, Pyenson B. Improved Management Can Help Reduce the Economic Burden of Type 2 Diabetes: A 20-Year Actuarial Projection. Milliman, Inc; 2010 April 28. 25 p. Retrieved from http://publications.milliman.com/publications/health-published/pdfs/improved-management-can-help.pdf.
  10. 10.
    Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291:2847–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    American Diabetes Association. Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2000;105(3 Pt 1):671–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Toumilehto J, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gatchel RJ. Comorbidity of chronic pain and mental health disorders: The biopsychosocial perspective. Am Psychol. 2004;59(8):795–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodgers JL. The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution. Am Psychol. 2010;61(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McHugh RK, Barlow DH. The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments: a review of current efforts. Am Psychol. 2010;65:73–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lambert MJ. Implications of outcome research for psychotherapy integration. In: Norcross JC, Goldstein MR, editors. Handbook of psychotherapy integration. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1991.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carryer JR, Greenberg LS. Optimal levels of emotional arousal in experiential therapy of depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78:190–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wampold BE, Mondin GW, Moody M, Stich F, Benson K, Ahn H. A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: empirically, all must have prizes. Psychol Bull. 1997;122(3):203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wampold BE. The great psychotherapy debate: models, methods, and findings. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frank JD, Frank JB. Persuasion & healing: a comparative study of psychotherapy. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Popper KR. The logic of scientific discovery. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2002.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaptchuk TJ, Friedlander E, Kelley JM, Sanchez MN, Kokkotou E, Singer JP, Kowalczykowski M, Miller FG, Kirsch I, Lembo AJ. Placebos without deception: A randomized controlled trial in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Woods DD, Patterson ES. How unexpected events produce an escalation of cognitive and coordinative demands. In: Hancock PA, Desmond PA, editors. Stress, workload, and fatigue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barlow DH. Negative effects from psychological treatments: a perspective. Am Psychol. 2010;65:13–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dimidjian S, Hollon SD. How would we know if psychotherapy were harmful? Am Psychol. 2010;65:21–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, Nilsen W, Allison SM, Memelstein R. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Translational Behav Med. 2011;1:53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(suppliment 1):1–61.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pincus D, Metten AM. Nonlinear dynamics in biopsychosocial resilience. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010;14:353–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hokfelt T. Neuropeptides in perspective: the last ten years. Neuron. 1991;7:867–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hokfelt T, Broberger C, Xu ZQ, Sergeyev V, Ubink R, Diez M. Neuropeptides: an overview. Neurop­harmacology. 2000;39:1337–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cohen, B. Telecoms pushing for mobile medicine payoff: The future of healthcare could bring a big payoff. May 2, 2011, On-line: http://www.investorplace.com/39330/telecoms-pushing-for-mobile-medicine-payoff/.
  34. 34.
    Pincus D, Sheikh AA. Imagery for pain relief: a scientifically grounded guidebook for clinicians. New York: Routledge; 2009.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guastello SJ, Liebovitch LS. Introduction to nonlinear dynamics and complexity. In: Guastello SJ, Koopmans M, Pincus D, editors. Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tenner E. Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Knopf; 1996.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pincus D. Coherence, complexity, and information flow: self-organizing processes in psychotherapy. In: Guastello SJ, Koopmans M, Pincus D, editors. Chaos and complexity in psychology: Theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pincus D, Guastello SJ. Nonlinear dynamics and interpersonal correlates of verbal turn-taking patterns in group therapy. Small Gr Res. 2005;36:635–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pincus D, Fox KM, Perez KA, Turner JS, McGee AR. Nonlinear dynamics of individual and interpersonal conflict in an experimental group. Small Gr Res. 2008;39:150–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pasqual-Leone A, Greenberg LS. Emotional processing in experiential therapy: Why ‘the only way out is through. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(6):875–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Guastello SJ. Managing emergent phenomena: nonlinear dynamics in work organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tschacher W, Scheier C, Grawe K. Order and pattern formation in psychotherapy. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 1998;2:195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eells TD. Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2007.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guastello SJ. Chaos, catastrophe, and human affairs: applications of nonlinear dynamics to work, organizations, and social evolution. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1995.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Guastello SJ. Nonlinear dynamics, complex systems, and occupational accidents. Int J Hum Factor Man. 2003;13:293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guastello SJ, Boeh H, Shumaker C, Schimmels M. Catastrophe models for cognitive workload and fatigue. Theor Issues Ergon Sci, 2011, 12, “ahead of print”.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thompson HL. The stress effect: why smart leaders make dumb decisions—and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lathrop DP, Kostelich EJ. Characterization of an experimental strange attractor by periodic orbits. Phys Rev. 1989;40:4028–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Guastello SJ, Hyde T, Odak M. Symbolic dynamic patterns of verbal exchange in a creative problem solving group. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 1998;2:35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Guastello SJ. Symbolic dynamic patterns of written exchange: Hierarchical structures in an electronic problem solving group. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2000;4:169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pincus D. A framework and methodology for the study of non-linear, self-organizing family dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2001;5:139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Spohn M. Violent societies: an application of orbital decomposition to the problem of human violence. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2008;12:87–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Katerndahl D, Ferrer R, Burge S, Becho J, Wood R. Recurrent patterns of daily intimate partner violence and environment. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010;14:511–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pincus D, Ortega DL, Metten AM. Orbital decomposition for multiple time series comparisons. In: Guastello SJ, Gregson RAM, editors. Nonlinear dynamical systems analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2010.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Peressini AF, Guastello SJ. Orbital Decomposition: a short user’s guide to ORBDE v1.2 [Computer program]. Retrieved 20 October, 2010 from http://www.societyforchaostheory.org/tutorials.
  57. 57.
    Linville PW. Self-complexity and affective extremity: don’t put all your eggs in one cognitive basket. Soc Cogn. 1985;3:94–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Linville PW. Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:663–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Raefelli-Mor E, Steinberg J. Self-complexity and well-being: a review and research synthesis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2002;6:31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Luo W, Watkins D, Lam RYH. Measuring self-complexity: a critical analysis of Linville’s H statistic. J Appl Meas. 2008;9(4):357–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pincus D, Cadsky O, Kavajian A, Chung C, Horst K, & Asuncion C.“Fractal Dimension in MMPI-2 Reaction Times as a Correlate of Psychopathology.” Paper presentation at the annual meeting for the Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and Life Sciences; 2009; Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Thom R. Structural stability and morphogenesis. New York: Benjamin-Addison-Wesley; 1975.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Guastello SJ. Moderator regression and the cusp catastrophe: Application of two-stage personnel selection, training, therapy, and program evaluation. Behav Sci. 1982;30:201–12.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Guastello SJ. Self-organization and leadership emergence in emergency response teams. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010;14:179–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47(9):1102–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Maddux JE. Personal Efficacy. In: Derlega VJ, Winstead BA, Jones WH, editors. Personality: contemporary theory and research. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall; 1991.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ajzen I, Manstead ASR. Changing health-related behaviors: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. In: Hewstone M, Schut HAW, De Wit JBF, Van Den Bos K, Stroebe MS, editors. The Scope of Social Psychology: theory and applications. New York: Psychology Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jacobsen JJ, Guastello SJ. Nonlinear models for the adoption and diffusion of innovations for industrial energy conservation. Nonlinear Dynam Psychol Life Sci. 2007;11:499–520.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Smerz KE, Guastello SJ. Cusp catastrophe model for binge drinking in a college population. Nonlinear Dynam Psychol Life Sci. 2008;12:205–22.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hayes SC, Follette VM, Linehan MM. Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York: Guilford; 2004.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:490–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Amir N, Beard C, Burns M, Bomyea J. Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118:28–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Klosterman C. Eating the dinosaur. New York: Scribner; 2009.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pincus D, Ortega DL, Metten AM. Orbital decomposition for multiple time series comparisons. In: Guastello SJ, Gregson RAM, editors. Nonlinear dynamical systems analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2011.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Fitzsimons GM, Finkel EJ. Outsourcing self-regulation. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:369–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chapman University, Crean School of Health and Life SciencesOrangeUSA
  2. 2.Marquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations