Advertisement

Putting Complexity to Work: Supporting Practitioners in Health Systems

  • Christine BroennerEmail author
  • Patrick Beautement
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter sheds a light on the practical use of insights stemming from Complexity Science for successful transformations in day-to-day practice in the wide field of health systems. A lot of research work has been conducted in the past years regarding how Complexity Science explains complex phenomena that have been observed in the health sector and described in numerous studies, articles and discussion papers. However, little has been offered to people working in the sector regarding the practical implications of the opportunities offered by the successful exploitation of Complexity Science insights. Practitioners—those who deal with complex realities in their day-to-day work, for example those involved in policy-making, community matters, humanitarian aid and emergency response or financial and spatial planning or organisation management—often lack a systematic appreciation of and approach for how to deal with complexity. These practitioners work in routine situations, but also with the unpredictable and novel events in dynamic environments that we call Complex realities—defined as: ‘Real-world situations which co-evolve with humans in an environment and in a dynamic manner which cannot be stopped and which can only be changed through engagement and influence’. In health systems, a wide variety of specific issues in such complex realities are described, which a few examples regarding the aspects of patient care shall illustrate: Matlow et al. [1] point out that the coordination of multi-disciplinary care is a key ingredient of quality patient care; Leykum et al. [2] pick up on the fact that the identification of effective ways to improve care of patients with chronic disease has been difficult because the non-linear nature of practice has not been recognised and systematically addressed; Browne and Varcoe [3] argue that in relation to Aboriginal health, nurses have to develop greater critical awareness of politics, culture and history, and how these have shaped people's health; Singhal [4] reviews the complex factors which affect the provision of high quality care of nursing homes and points out the importance of the quality of the relationships between nursing home staff members. These papers indicate that Complexity Science can provide useful explanations of individual complex phenomena observed. To work and engage with these dynamic phenomena, however, require appropriate integrative ways-of-working in the diverse areas in or related to the health sector—ways that are immediately usable to practitioners in their particular context.

Keywords

Health Sector Complex Situation Workshop Participant Complex Reality Successful Transformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the ASSYST Program which co-sponsored the ECCS Satellite Workshop ‘Putting Complexity to Work—Supporting the Practitioners’. We would also like to thank all participants of the workshop for their contributions.

References

  1. 1.
    Matlow AG, Wright JG, Zimmerman B, Valente M, Thomson K. How can the principles of complexity science be applied to improve the coordination of care for complex pediatric patients? Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(2):85–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leykum LK, Pugh J, Lawrence V, Parchman M, Noël PH, Cornell J, McDaniel RR. Organizational interventions employing principles of complexity science have improved outcomes for patients with Type II diabetes. Implement Sci. 2007;2:28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Browne AJ, Varcoe C. Critical cultural perspectives and health care involving aboriginal peoples. Contemp Nurse. 2006;22(2):155–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singhal A. Which nursing home would you put your mother IN [Internet]. Plexus Institute, Complexity Series; 2007. Available from http://www.plexusinstitute.org/resource/resmgr/docs/which-nursing-home-mcdaniel.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Brown J, Isaacs D. The World Café. Shaping our Futures through Conversations that matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schön DA. The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayasinghe S. Conceptualising population health: from mechanistic thinking to complexity science. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2011;8:2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eppel E, Matheson A, Walton M. Applying complexity theory to New Zealand public policy. Principles for practice. Policy Q. 2011;7(1):48–55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Booth BJ, Zwar N, Harris M. A complexity perspective on health care improvement and reform in general practice and primary health care. Aust J Prim Health. 2010;16(1):29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plsek P. Complexity and the adoption of innovation in health care. accelerating quality improvement in health care [Internet]. Strategies to Speed the Diffusion of Evidence-Based Innovations Conference, Washington, DC. 27–28 Jan 2003. Available from http://www.nihcm.org/pdf/Plsek.pdf.
  11. 11.
    Griffiths F. Complexity science and its relevance for primary health care research. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:377–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Capra F. The web of life. London: Harper Collins; 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beautement P, Broenner C. Complexity Demystified, – a guide for practitioners. Axminster: Triarchy Press; 2011. p. 17.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Armson R. Growing wings on the way: systems thinking for messy situations. Axminster: Triarchy Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Musgrove P. Indicators: how much complexity is desirable? Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2002;5 suppl 1:73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martens P, Thomas C. Climate change and malaria risk: complexity and scaling, chapter 2. In: Takken W, Martens P, Bogers RJ, editors. Environmental change and malaria risk: global and local implications. Wageningen: Wageningen UR Frontis Series; 2005. p. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Daniel M, Rosenstein AH. Professional communication and team collaboration, chapter 33. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient safety and quality. an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McMurty A. Reinterpreting interdisciplinary health teams from a complexity science perspective. Univ Alberta Health Sci J. 2007;4(1):33–42.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chambers R. Revolutions in development inquiry. London: Earthscan; 2008.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nicolescu B. Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Max-Neef MA. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol Econ. 2005;53:5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ackermann G. Evaluation of complex interventions in social systems [Internet]. IUHPE World Conference in Geneva, 14 Jul 2010. Available from http://iuhpe.gesundheitsfoerderung.ch/downloads/en/Programme/PDFs/Wild_Side/Ackermann---2010-Complexity-and-evaluation-def.pdf.
  23. 23.
    Conn E. Community engagement. A social eco-system dance. [Internet]. European Conference on Complex Systems 2009. Available from http://www.abaci.net/library/eccs03_eileen-conn.pdf.
  24. 24.
    Vergeer P, Canavan A, Rothmann IA. Rethink on the Use of Aid Mechanisms in Health Sector Early Recovery [Internet]. Amsterdam: KIT Development Policy and Practice; 2009. Available from http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&type=Document&id=3258.
  25. 25.
    Beautement P, Broenner C. Complexity Demystified – a guide for practitioners. Axminster: Triarchy Press; 2011. p. 47.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurtz CF, Snowden D. The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex world. IBM Syst J. 2003;42(3):462–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mitleton-Kelly E. Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. In: Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives of organisations: the application of complexity theory to organisations. London: Pergamon; 2003. p. 3–20.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Beautement P, Broenner C. Complexity Demystified – a guide for practitioners. Axminster: Triarchy Press; 2011. p. 58.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen J, Stewart I. The collapse of Chaos. Discovering simplicity in a complex world. London: Penguin Books; 2000.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morowitz HJ. The emergence of everything: how the world became complex. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davies P. The cosmic blueprint. Order and complexity at the edge of chaos. London: Penguin; 1995.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Prigogine I. The end of certainty. New York: The Free Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Batten DF. Changing our brains: systemic causality in complex human systems. Proceedings of the 18th conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation, Sundance, UT, 31 March–2 April 2009; p. 9–14.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reynolds CW. Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Comput Graph. 1987;21(4):25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gell-Mann M. Fundamental sources of unpredictability. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute. Conference on fundamental sources of unpredictability. Mar 1996; 10.1.1.7.1.: 7–8.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hofstadter DR. Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid. London: Penguin Books; 1983.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Heylighen F. Complexity and self-organization. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN, editors. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2008.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lorenz EN. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci. 1963;20(2):130–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ashby WR. An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall; 1956.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barabasi AL. Linked: how everything is connected to everything else and what it means. London: Plume; 2003.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Watts DJ. Six degrees: the science of a connected age. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 2003.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beautement P, Broenner C. Complexity Demystified – a guide for practitioners. Axminster: Triarchy Press; 2011. p. 134.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J. Strategy Safari. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ebi KL, Semenza JC. Community-based adaptation to the health impacts of climate change. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5):501–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The abaci Partnership LLPTewkesburyUK

Personalised recommendations