Knowledge-Based Information Systems: A Wind Farm Case Study

  • Bindi Chen
  • William Wei Song
  • Yanhui Feng
  • Yingning Qiu
  • Peter Tavner
Conference paper


The process of information systems development (ISD) has been studied before to enhance generated information systems. It has been recognised recently that the use of knowledge management (KM) methodologies in ISD, so-called knowledge-based information systems (KIS), supports the acquisition and representation of knowledge, both from application domains and development processes. This is important when huge amounts of data from application domains require processing and massive knowledge is buried in the processes. A particular example of this problem lies in the wind industry, where offshore wind farms collect a massive amount of data, yet there is a lack of knowledge about the processes generating the data, which is overwhelming operators. However, there is a gap between KM and ISD, which still needs to be closed.

This chapter will attempt to bridge this gap in a step-by-step manner to analyse information to create knowledge in the following way.

Firstly, within the framework, we consider an organisation as a complex intelligent agent to handle internal and external information.

Secondly, we consider how the KM methods can be integrated with ISD, through those intelligent agents or multi-agents, to handle the domain and process knowledge.

Finally, we define a conceptual model of a KIS to support the ISD to derive enterprise-wide knowledge, experience and decision-making in a data-intensive and complex wind farm management. We develop a prototype KIS model and implement it on working wind farm data to evaluate and validate the proposed approach.


Knowledge Management Wind Farm Intelligent Agent Intellectual Capital Information System Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abdullah MS, Kimble C, Benest I, Paige R (2006) Knowledge-based systems: a re-evaluation. J Knowl Manage 10(3):127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apshvalka D, Grundspenkis J (2005) Personal knowledge management and intelligent agent perspective. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on information systems development pre-conference-ISD, Karlstad, Sweden, 14–17 August 2005Google Scholar
  3. Benko C, McFarlan W (2003) Connecting the dots: aligning projects with objectives in unpredictable times. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng Y, Tavner PJ, Long H (2010) Early experiences with UK round 1 offshore wind farms. Proc Inst Civil Eng Energy 163(4):167–181Google Scholar
  5. Feng Y, Qiu Y, Crabtree C, Long H, Tavner PJ (2011) Use Of SCADA and CMS Signals for failure detection & Diagnosis of a wind turbine gearbox. In: EWEA, 2011, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  6. Fichman R, Keil M, Tiwana A (2005) Beyond valuation: real options thinking in IT project management. Calif Manage Rev 47(2):74–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grant R (1996) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Org Sci 7(4):375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grundspenkis J (2006) Agent-based framework for modelling of organization and personal knowledge from knowledge management perspective. In: Knowledge enterprise: intelligent strategies in product design, manufacturing, and management, proceedings of PROLAMAT. Springer, Boston, pp 62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grundspenkis J, Kirikova M (2005) Impact of the intelligent agent paradigm on knowledge management. In: Leondes CT (ed) Intelligent knowledge-based systems, vol 1, Knowledge-based systems. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Harman KD, Raftery PG (2003) Analytical techniques for understanding the performance of operational wind farms. In: EWEC, 2003, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  11. Meso P, Madey G, Troutt MD, Liegle J (2006) The knowledge management efficacy of matching information systems development methodologies with application characteristics—an experimental study. J Syst Softw 79(1):15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nurcan S, Colette R (2003) A multi-method for defining the organizational change. Inf Softw Technol 45(2):61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Russell SJ, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River,  Chapter 2. ISBN 0-13-790395-2Google Scholar
  14. Tavner PJ (2008) Wind power as a clean-energy contributor. Energy Policy 36(12):4397–4400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. The Economics of Wind Energy (2009) A report by the European Wind Energy Association. Krohn S (ed). Poul-Erik Morthorst. Shimon AwerbuchGoogle Scholar
  16. Tiwana A, Keil M, Fichman R (2006) IS project continuation in escalation situations: a real options model. Decis Sci J 37(3):357–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xia W, Lee G (2005) Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development. J Manage Inf Syst 22(1):45–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bindi Chen
    • 1
  • William Wei Song
    • 1
  • Yanhui Feng
    • 1
  • Yingning Qiu
    • 1
  • Peter Tavner
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering and Computing ScienceDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations