Skip to main content

Slide Preparation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Essentials in Cytopathology ((EICP,volume 12))

Abstract

1691—Bonanni published first illustration of a “slider.”1 Early 1800s—Slider transitions to slide.2 1840—Microscopical Society of London sets 3×1-in. as the standard size for micro slides.3 1957—Frosted “Dakin” slide patented.4 1970—ASTM publishes its fi rst Standard Speci fi cation for Cover Glasses and Glass Slides for Use in Microscopy.5

“Adhesion flattens and retains cells; cohesion fattens and loses cells.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    RPMI is named for Roswell Park Memorial Institute.

References

  1. Bonanni F. Observationes circa viventia, quae in rebus non viventibus reperiuntur. Cum micrographia curiosa. Rome: DA Hercules; 1691.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gould C. The companion to the microscope. London: W Cary; 1827.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker JR. Charter centenary of The Royal Microscopical Society. Nature. 1966;210(5036):564–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dakin ES, inventor. Microscope slide. US Patent 2801568. 6 Aug 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard specification for cover glasses and glass slides for use in microscopy. E211-70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baker H. The microscope made easy. London: R Dodsley; 1743.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carmichael DE. The Pap smear: life of George N. Papanicolaou. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kohn J, Earle JHO. Use of dry fixative slides for exfoliative cytology. J Clin Pathol. 1965;18:479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer P. Mitt zool Stat Neapel. 1883;4:521.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baker JR, Jordan BM. Miscellaneous contributions to microtechnique. Q J Microsc Sci. 1953;94(3):237–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dakin ES. Improved adhesion and visibility of cytologic preparations by use of the frosted glass slide. Science. 1955;121(3144):424–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Husain OA, Millett JA, Grainger JM. Use of polylysine-coated slides in preparation of cell samples for diagnostic cytology with special reference to urine sample. J Clin Pathol. 1980;33(3):309–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watts KC, Husain OAN. Optimal use of cationic polyelectrolyte poly-L-lysine in preparation of cell monolayers for diagnostic cytopathology. J Clin Pathol. 1984;37(7):829–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saccomanno G, Saunders RP, Ellis H, Archer VE, Wood BG, Beckler PA. Concentration of carcinoma or atypical cells in sputum. Acta Cytol. 1963;7(5):305–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Naylor B. The elimination of a ribbing effect observed in cytologic smears. Am J Clin Pathol. 1958;30(2):143–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DeMay RM. The art & science of cytopathology. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: ASCP Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moriarty AT. When and how to use CPT code 88172. CAP Today 2006;20(9). Available at http://www.cap.org/apps/portlets/contentViewer/show.do?printFriendly=true&contentReference=cap_today%2Fpap_ngc%2F0906NGC_CPT.html. Accessed 6 May 2012.

  18. The Joint Commission. NPSG UP.01.03.01: A time-out is performed before the procedure. National Patient Safety Goals Effective January 1, 2012. Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/NPSG_Chapter_Jan2012_HAP.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2012.

  19. Optimal FNA Techniques…. A series of educational videos from the DVD by Britt-Marie Liung MD, UCSF. Available at http://papsociety.org/fna.html. Accessed 14 May 2012.

  20. NCCLS. Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) techniques; Approved guideline—second edition. NCCLS document GP20-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-509-7). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898 USA; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perlman EJ, Erozan YS, Howdon A. The role of the Saccomanno technique in sputum cytopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;91(1):57–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maksem JA, Dhanwada V, Trueblood JE, Weidmann J, Kane B, Bolick DR, et al. Testing automated liquid-based cytology samples with a manual liquid-based cytology method using residual cell suspensions from 500 ThinPrep cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(6):391–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JM, Kelly D, Gravitt PE, Fansler Z, Maksem JA, Clark DP. Validation of a low-cost, liquid-based screening method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):965–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maksem JA, Bedrossian CW, Kurtycz D, Sewall S, Shalkham J, Dhanwada V, et al. Resolving ASCUS without recourse to HPV testing: manual reprocessing of residual automated liquid-based cytology (ALBC) material using manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC). Diagn Cytopathol. 2005;33(6):434–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maksem JA, Dhanwada V, Trueblood JE, Weidmann J, Kane B, Bolick DR, Bedrossian CWM. Incorporating suspended articles into insoluble thin membranes reveals significant preanalytical error in the automated liquid-based Pap test. Cancer Cytopathol. 2004;48(5):664–5. Supplement Abstract 17.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maksem JA, Finnemore M, Belsheim BL, Roose EB, Makkapati SR, Eatwell L, Weidmann J. Manual method for liquid-based cytology: a demonstration using 1,000 gynecological cytologies collected directly to vial and prepared by a smear-slide technique. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;25(5):334–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maksem JA, Weidmann J. Specialized preparative devices are not needed for liquid-based, thin-layer cytology: an alternate manual method using a metastable alcoholic gel. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;25(4):262–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson T, Maksem JA, Belsheim BL, Roose EB, Klock LA, Eatwell L. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;22(2):86–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Beyer-Boon ME, van der Voorn-Den Hollander MJ, Arentz PW, Cornelisse CJ, Schaberg A, Fox CH. Effect of various routine cytopreparatory techniques on normal urothelial cells and their nuclei. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1979;87(1):63–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gill GW. Air-dried/rehydrated CV smears are different. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;18(5):381–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang GCH. The mathematical basis for the increased sensitivity in cancer detection in air-dried cytopreparations. Mod Pathol. 1994;7(6):681–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pang Y, Smola B, Pu RT, Michael CW. Restoring satisfactory status in ThinPrep Pap test specimens with too few squamous cells and containing microscopic red blood cells. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36(10):696–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Haack LA, O’Brien D, Selvaggi SM. Protocol for the processing of bloody cervical specimens: glacial acetic acid and the ThinPrep Pap Test. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(3):210–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dalton P, MacDonald S, Boerner S. Acetic acid recovery of gynecologic liquid-based samples of apparent low squamous cellularity. Acta Cytol. 2006;50(2):136–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Islam S, West AM, Saboorian MH, Ashfaq R. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2004;102(2):67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rowe LR, Bentz JS. A simple method to determine the need for glacial acetic acid treatment of bloody ThinPrep Pap tests before slide processing. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;31(5):321–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bentz JS, Rowe LR, Gopez EV, Marshall CJ. The unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap Test: missed opportunity for disease detection? Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117(3):457–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Song LH, Goh ES, Phang LC, Poh WT, Tay SK. Technical aspect of ThinPrep. Singapore Med J. 2000;41(12):575–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Apppendix A. Saponin Technique for Bloody Fresh Cell Suspensions

Apppendix A. Saponin Technique for Bloody Fresh Cell Suspensions

When erythrocytes outnumber nucleated cells in specimens from any body site, they exclude such cells—including cancer cells—from micro preparations. These preparations are technically satisfactory but functionally unsatisfactory, meaning that the preparations represent the true mix of cells in the raw specimens and have been well prepared but are useless for cancer detection. Specifically the preparation method has invalidated the value of the raw specimen. The results are reported as within normal limits, when in fact the preparation method is unsatisfactory and the reported result is a false negative.

This common problem can be remedied by eliminating erythrocytes from cytologic specimens before the cell concentrate is collected on slides or filters. Such an approach to specimen enrichment is entirely different than hemolyzing RBCs after a cell spread is prepared by immersing it in a Carnoy’s-type hemolytic fixative or in 2 M urea. The latter techniques merely increase the visibility of the remaining cells but leave their numbers unchanged.

The saponin method that follows hemolyzes erythrocytes while in suspension, thus proportionally increasing the number of nucleated cells available for microscopic examination and permitting these cells to occupy the additional collection/display area that is now available. This enrichment technique was used in a research project on circulating cancer cells in peripheral blood.

The first time it was used for a clinical application, the control preparations exhibited countless erythrocytes but no cancer cells. The experimental preparations that had been processed with the saponin method described below, on the other hand, exhibited the exact opposite results: no erythrocytes and an abundance of cancer cells. If the specimen had not been processed with saponin, it would have been reported as negative and satisfactory. In other words, it would have been a laboratory technique-based false negative.

This technique should be applied to all cytologic specimens in which erythrocytes are visible in the cell concentrate—no matter how small—following the initial centrifugation.

A.1 Materials

  • Hemolytic agent: 1% (w/v) saponin in distilled water with 0.2% sodium p-hydroxybenzoate as a preservative (optional). Filter through a 5 µm pore size cellulosic filter after preparation (also optional). Keep refrigerated

  • Antihemolytic agent: 3% (w/v) calcium gluconate in distilled water with 0.2% sodium p-hydroxybenzoate (optional). Filter as above. Keep refrigerated

  • Balanced electrolyte solution (not normal saline)

  • 50-mL plastic centrifuge tubes

  • Transfer pipettes

  • Vortex mixer

A.2 Method

  1. 1.

    Centrifuge the specimen, up to 50 mL, for 10 min at 3,000 rpm.

  2. 2.

    Discard the supernatant.

  3. 3.

    Add 25 mL balanced electrolyte solution.

  4. 4.

    Resuspend the cell concentrate by repeatedly inverting the centrifuge tube, or better, by agitating the contents on a vortex mixer.

  5. 5.

    Add balanced electrolyte solution to the 45-mL level and mix.

  6. 6.

    Add 2 mL saponin and invert several times to mix.

  7. 7.

    After 1 min, add 3 mL calcium gluconate.

  8. 8.

    Centrifuge 10 min at 3,000 rpm.

  9. 9.

    Decant the supernatant.

  10. 10.

    Prepare cell spreads if volume permits. Otherwise, resuspend the button in 5 mL balanced salt solution for collection by cytocentrifugation or membrane filtration.

A.3 Results

After step 8, the supernatant will be colored red (the depth of color is a function of amount of hemoglobin released by the RBCs); the cell concentrate, white. RBC ghosts remain suspended in the supernatant and thus cannot contaminate the cell concentrate. The increased number of nucleated cells is remarkable. Cancer cells are often present in the specimen that otherwise would be absent in the final preparation.

A.4 Discussion

The value of the results is self-evident. The relative amount of RBC to nucleated cells determines whether the specimen should be treated with saponin. In other words, even small total numbers qualify for saponin enrichment. The saponin and calcium gluconate solutions may grow microbes. It is uncertain how long saponin solutions remain effective. Historically, we discarded saponin solutions after 1 week. Saponin is a plant derivative that varies in activity. Some lots may require higher concentrations and/or longer exposure times. Saponin hemolyzes RBCs by etching holes in the membranes, thus allowing hemoglobin to escape. Nucleated cells will begin to show cytoplasmic damage if exposed to saponin for too long. Saponin does not work in alcohol-preserved specimens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gill, G.W. (2013). Slide Preparation. In: Cytopreparation. Essentials in Cytopathology, vol 12. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4933-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4933-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4932-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4933-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics