Advertisement

The Importance of Jatropha for Brazil

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Fossil derived fuels currently supply most of the world’s energy, even though it represents a finite resource. Aiming at reducing the fossil fuels dependency, alternative sources of energy have been pursued in the last few years. In view of the urgent need to develop new technologies that may enable the widespread use of environment friendly forms of energy, biofuels in general and biodiesel in particular, are receiving considerable attention throughout the world and especially in Brazil. Due to the high quality of its oil that meets the rapeseed quality standard, to the fact that its oil can be easily converted into biodiesel, and its wide adaptability, physic nut (Jatropha curcas) has been considered a potential crop to serve as feedstock for biodiesel production. In that context, this chapter demonstrates the potential of physic nut as a biofuel crop, highlighting however the existing challenges to its wide adoption as a fuel crop. Even facing enormous challenges (detailed below), our cautiously yet optimistic vision is that a dense and directed research program may successfully make physic nut a viable feedstock for biodiesel production. In that respect we detail the Embrapa research initiative drawn to address many of the existing challenges.

Keywords

Seed Yield Phorbol Ester Genomic Selection Selective Breeding Recurrent Selection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support from the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) to BRJATROPHA as well as the students, research collaborators and breeders for their constant scientific inputs and useful discussions.

References

  1. Achten WMJ, Nielsen LR, Aerts R, Lengkeek AG, Kjær ED, Trabucco A et al (2010) Towards domestication of Jatropha curcas. Biofuels 1:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achten WMJ, Verchot L, Franken YJ, Mathijs E, Singh VP, Aerts R et al (2008) Jatropha bio-diesel production and use. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1063–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BAP (2006) Brazilian agroenergy plan. Embrapa, BrasiliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Beltrão NEM (2005) Agronegócio das oleaginosas no Brasil. Informe Agropecuário 26:14–17, PortugueseGoogle Scholar
  5. Berchmans HJ, Hirata S (2008) Biodiesel production from crude Jatropha curcas L. seed oil with a high content of free fatty acids. Bioresour Technol 99:1716–1721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carels N (2009) Jatropha curcas: a review. Adv Bot Res 50:39–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR, Praça MM, Araújo FS, Carels N (2008) Genome size, base composition and karyotype of Jatropha curcas L., an important biofuel plant. Plant Sci 174:613–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa AAA, Junior NP, Aranda DAG (2010) The situation of biofuels in Brazil: new generation technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:3041–3049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devappa RK, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2010a) Biodegradation of Jatropha curcas phorbol esters in soil. J Sci Food Agric 90:2090–2097PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Devappa RK, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2010b) Jatropha toxicity. A review. J Toxicol Environ Heal B 13:476–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devappa RK, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2011) Jatropha Diterpenes: a review. J Am Oil Chem Soc 88:301–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dias LAS, Leme LP, Laviola BG, Pallini Filho A, Pereira OL, Carvalho M et al (2007) Cultivo de pinhão manso (Jatropha curcas L.) para produção de óleo combustível. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, PortugueseGoogle Scholar
  13. Divakara BN, Upadhyaya HD, Wani SP, Laxmipathi Gowda CL (2010) Biology and genetic improvement of Jatropha curcas L. A review. Appl Energy 87:732–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drumond MA, Santos CAF, Oliveira VR, Anjos JB, Evangelista MRV (2009) Desempenho agronômico de genótipos de pinhão manso irrigado no Semiárido pernambucano aos 12 e 24 meses de idade. I Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa em Pinhão Manso. F&B Comunicação e eventos, Brasília. PortugueseGoogle Scholar
  15. Drumond MA, Santos CAF, Oliveira VR, Martins JC, Anjos JB, Evangelista MRV (2010) Agronomic performance of different genotypes of physic nut in the semi-arid zone of Pernambuco state. Ciência Rural 40:44–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duraes FOM, Laviola BG, Alves AA (2011) Potential and challenges in making physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.) a viable biofuel crop: the Brazilian perspective. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 6:043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ginwal HS, Rawat PS, Srivastava RL (2004) Seed source variation in growth performance and oil yield of Jatropha curcas Linn. in central India. Silvae Genet 53:186–192Google Scholar
  18. Gomes KA, Almeida T, Gesteira A, Lobo IP, Guimarães ACR, de Miranda AB et al (2010) ESTs from seeds to assist the selective breeding of Jatropha curcas L. for oil and active compounds. Genomics Insights 3:29–56Google Scholar
  19. Goel G, Makkar HPS, Francis G, Becker K (2007) Phorbol esters: structure, biological activity, and toxicity in animals. Intl J Toxicol 26:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grattapaglia D, Kirst M (2008) Eucalyptus applied genomics: from gene sequences to breeding tools. New Phytol 179:911–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grattapaglia D, Resende MDV (2011) Genomic selection in forest tree breeding. Tree Genet Genomes 7:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gressel J (2008) Transgenics are imperative for biofuel crops. Plant Sci 174:246–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heller J (1996) Physic nut—Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. International Institute of Plant Genetic and Crop Plant Research & Plant Genetic Resource Institute, Gatersleben/RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. Jha TM, Priyanka M, Datta MM (2007) Somatic embryogenesis in Jatropha curcas L. an important biofuel plant. Plant Biotechnol Rep 1:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson TS, Eswaran N, Sujatha M (2011) Molecular approaches to improvement of Jatropha curcas Linn. as a sustainable energy crop. Plant Cell Rep 30:1573–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. La Rovere EL, Pereira AS, Simoes AF (2011) Biofuels and sustainable energy development in Brazil. World Dev 39:1026–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laviola BG, Alves AA (2011) Matérias primas potenciais para a produção de biodiesel: situação atual e perspectivas. In: Lana RP, Guimarães C, Lima GS, Veloso CM, Patino HO (eds) Simpósio Brasileiro de Agropecuária Sustentável: O uso de Tecnologias Limpas e Agroenergia. Arka editora, Viçosa. PortugueseGoogle Scholar
  28. Laviola BG, Alves AA, Gurgel FL, Rosado TB, Rocha RB, Albrecht JC (2012a) Estimates of genetic parameters for physic nut traits based in the germplasm two years evaluation. Ciência Rural 42:429–435Google Scholar
  29. Laviola BG, Alves AA, Gurgel FL, Rosado TB, Costa RD, Rocha RB (2012b) Estimate of genetic parameters and predicted gains with early selection of physic nut families. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 36:163–170Google Scholar
  30. Laviola BG, Dias LAD (2008) Nutrient concentration in Jatropha curcas L. leaves and fruits and estimated extraction at harvest. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 32:1969–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laviola BG, Rosado TB, Bhering LL, Kobayashi AK, Resende MDV (2010) Genetic parameters and variability in physic nut accessions during early developmental stages. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 45:1117–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu P, Wang CM, Li L, Sun F, Liu P, Yue GH (2011) Mapping QTLs for oil traits and eQTLs for oleosin genes in jatropha. BMC Plant Biol 11:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-132 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mastan SG, Sudheer PDVN, Rahman H, Reddy MP, Chikara J (2012) Development of SCAR marker specific to non-toxic Jatropha curcas L. and designing a novel multiplexing PCR along with nrDNA ITS primers to circumvent the false negative detection. Mol Biotechnol 50:57–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Modi MK, Reddy JRC, Rao BVSK, Prasad RBN (2007) Lipase-mediated conversion of vegetable oils into biodiesel using ethyl acetate as acyl acceptor. Bioresour Technol 98:1260–1264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moura EF, Ventrella MC, Motoike SY (2010) Anatomy, histochemistry and ultrastructure of seed and somatic embryo of Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae). Sci Agric 67:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Openshaw K (2000) A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise. Biomass Bioenergy 19:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pallet RN, Sale G (2006) The relative contributions of tree improvement and cultural practice toward productivity gains in Eucalyptus pulpwood stands. For Ecol Manage 193:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raiger HL, Dua RP, Sharma SK, Phogat BS (2011) Performance and stability of jatropha (Jatropha curcas) for seed yield and its components. Indian J Agric Sci 81:125–128Google Scholar
  39. Rakshit KD, Darukeshwara J, Raj KR, Narasimhamurthy K, Saibaba P, Bhagya S et al (2008) Toxicity studies of detoxified Jatropha meal (Jatropha curcas) in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 46:3621–3625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramakris TS, Radhakri PN (1963) Jatropha curcas L.—a collateral host for Oidium heveae, stein. Curr Sci 32:428Google Scholar
  41. Rao GR, Korwar GR, Shanker AK, Ramakrishna YS (2008) Genetic associations, variability and diversity in seed characters, growth, reproductive phenology and yield in Jatropha curcas L. accessions. Trees Struct Funct 22:697–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Resende MDV, Resende MFR, Sansaloni CP, Petroli CD, Missiaggia AA, Aguiar AM et al (2012a) Genomic selection for growth and wood quality in Eucalyptus: capturing the missing heritability and accelerating breeding for complex traits in forest trees. New Phytol 194:116–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Resende MFR, Munoz P, Acosta JJ, Peter GF, Davis JM, Grattapaglia D et al (2012b) Accelerating the domestication of trees using genomic selection: accuracy of prediction models across ages and environments. New Phytol 193:617–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rocha RB, Ramalho AR, Laviola BG, Santos AR, Spinelli VM, Holanda ZF (2011) Genetic progress in grain yield of the physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.). Biomass Bioenergy, in pressGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosado TB, Laviola BG, Faria DA, Pappas MR, Bhering LL, Quirino B et al (2010) Molecular markers reveal limited genetic diversity in a large germplasm collection of the biofuel crop Jatropha curcas L. in Brazil. Crop Sci 50:2372–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sato S, Hirakawa H, Isobe S, Fukai E, Watanabe A, Kato M et al (2010) Sequence analysis of the genome of an oil-bearing tree. Jatropha curcas L. DNA Res 1–12. doi:10.1093/dnares/dsq030Google Scholar
  47. Silva-Junior O, Rosado T, Laviola B, Pappas M, Pappas G, Grattapaglia D (2011) Genome-wide SNP discovery from a pooled sample of accessions of the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas based on whole-transcriptome Illumina resequencing. BMC Proc 5:P57. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spinelli VM, Rocha RB, Ramalho AR, Marcolan AL, Vieira Júnior JR, Fernandes CF et al (2010) Primary and secondary yield components of the oil in physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.). Cienc Rural 40:1752–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sujatha M, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2005) Shoot bud proliferation from axillary nodes and leaf sections of non-toxic Jatropha curcas L. Plant growth Regul 47:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sunil N, Varaprasad KS, Sivaraj N, Kumar TS, Abraham B, Prasad RBN (2008) Assessing Jatropha curcas L. germplasm in situ—A case study. Biomass Bioenergy 32:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vermerris W (2008) Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yuan JS, Tiller KH, Al-Ahmad H, Stewart NR, Stewart CN (2008) Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future. Trends Plant Sci 13:421–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Embrapa Agroenergia, PqEBBrasiliaBrazil
  2. 2.Embrapa RondôniaPorto VelhoBrazil
  3. 3.Embrapa SemiáridoPetrolinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options