Skip to main content

Choices for Patients and Clinicians: Ethics and Legal Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Addressing Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care

Abstract

Physicians deal with legal issues regarding patient safety and confidentiality on a regular basis, and these can be challenging when patients have problems related to alcohol. Ethical issues arise when there are conflicts between principles of patient autonomy, physician beneficence, and justice that may relate to both public safety and individual health. Legal concerns often relate to privacy and confidentiality and vary from state to state. This chapter addresses some common legal and ethical issues that may be encountered in primary care when addressing issues related to alcohol use or its consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Model laws regulations and guidelines. NAIC: Model regulation service. Kansas City: Uniform Individual Accident and Sickness Policy Provisions Law. 2004; Vol. II, p. 180–181.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mello MJ, Nirenberg TD, Lindquist D, et al. Physicians’ attitudes regarding reporting alcohol-impaired drivers. Subst. Abuse. 2003;24:233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krumholz A, Fisher RS, Lesser RP, Hauser WA. Driving and epilepsy: a review and reappraisal. JAMA. 1991;265:622–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). Public policy statement of reporting of patient information related to fitness for driving or other potentially dangerous activities. J Addictive Dis. 2000;19:125–127.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guohua L, Brady JE, DiMaggio C, et al. Validity of suspected alcohol and drug violations in aviation employees. Addiction. 2010;105:1771–1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook CCH. Alcohol and aviation. Addiction. 1997;92:539–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Platenius PH, Wilde GJS. Personal characteristics related to accident histories of Canadian pilots. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 1989;60:42–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris LH, Paltrow L. The status of pregnant women and fetuses in U.S. criminal law. JAMA. 2003;289:1697–1699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lambert B, Scheiner M, Campbell D. Ethical issues and addiction. J Addictive Diseases. 2010;29:164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abel EL, Kruger M. Physician attitudes concerning legal coercion of pregnant alcohol and drug abusers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:768–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson v. City of Charleston: US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Wests Fed Rep. 1999;186:469–489.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kimbel AS. Pregnant drug abusers are treated like criminals or not treated at all: a third option proposed. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2004;21:36–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wunsch MJ, Weaver MF. Alcohol and other drug use during pregnancy: management of the affected mother and child. In: Ries R, Fiellin D, Miller S, Saitz R, editors. Principles of addiction medicine. 4th ed. Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 2009. p. 1111–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nace EP, Birkmayer F, Sullivan MA, et al. Socially sanctioned coercion mechanisms for addiction treatment. Am J Addict. 2007;16:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark DB. The natural history of adolescent alcohol use disorders. Addiction. 2004;99 Suppl 1:5–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hingson RW, Heeren T, Winter MR. Age at drinking onset and alcohol dependence: age at onset, duration, and severity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:739–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Young TL, Zimmerman R. Clueless: parent knowledge of risk behaviors of middle school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:1137–1139.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ford CA, Millstein SG, Alpern-Felsher BL, Irwin CE. Influence of physician confidentiality assurances on adolescents’ willingness to disclose information and seek future health care. JAMA. 1997;278:1029–1034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gittler J, Quigley-Rick M, Saks MJ. Adolescent health care decision making: the law and public policy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clark HW, Bizzell AC. Ethical issues in addiction practice. In: Ries R, Fiellin D, Miller S, Saitz S, editors. Principles of addiction medicine. 4th ed. Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 2009. p. 1485–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wild TC, Newton-Taylor B, Alleto R. Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: structural and psychological determinants. Addictive Behav. 1998;23:81–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasin DS. Treatment/self-help for alcohol-related problems. Relationship to social pressure and alcohol dependence. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;55:660–666.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hora PF, Schma WG. Drug courts and the treatment of incarcerated populations. In: Ries R, Fiellin D, Miller S, Saitz R, editors. Principles of addiction medicine. 4th ed. Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 2009. p. 1513–1518.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cooper CS. Drug courts—just the beginning: getting other areas of public policy in sync. Subst Use Misuse. 2007;42:243–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McMurran M. What works in substance misuse treatments for offenders. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2007;17:225–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klag S, O’Callaghan F, Creed P. The use of legal coercion in the treatment of substance abusers? An overview and critical analysis of thirty years of research. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40:1777–1795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spike J. A paradox about capacity, alcoholism, and noncompliance. J Clin Ethics. 1997;8:303–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Charuvastra A, Friedmann PD, Stein MD. Physician attitudes regarding the prescription of medical marijuana. J Addict Dis. 2005;24:87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Joy JE, Watson SJ, Benson JA. Marijuana and medicine: assessing the science base.  Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Weaver FASAM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weaver, M. (2013). Choices for Patients and Clinicians: Ethics and Legal Issues. In: Saitz, R. (eds) Addressing Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4779-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4779-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4778-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4779-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics