Virtual Middle School Courses to Support Anytime, Anyplace Learning

Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS)


The middle school years are a pivotal academic and social transition period that sets the stage for future educational success. Differentiated and personalized learning support middle school success across the spectrum of student abilities. Online courses are well-suited for meeting individual needs at the middle school level when they incorporate flexible timelines and interaction among students and teachers.


Middle School Online Learning Middle School Student Learning Management System Online Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allensworth, E., & Easton, J. (2007). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in Chicago public high schools: A close look at course grades, failures and attendance in the freshman year. Retrieved from
  2. Anderson, T., & Kuskis, A. (2007). Interaction. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 295–309). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Asuncion, J. V., Fichten, C. S., Wolforth, J., Hewlett, M., Klomp, R., & Barile, M. (2006). Accessibility of eLearning in postsecondary education: Student and faculty perspectives. Proceedings of the CSUN (California State University, Northridge) technology and persons with disabilities conference. Retrieved from
  4. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackerby, C. (2010). Middle school online learning. Austin, TX: Texas Virtual School Network.Google Scholar
  6. Cavanaugh, C. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 73–78.Google Scholar
  7. Cavanaugh, C. (2007). Student achievement in elementary and high school. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 473–490). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Cavanaugh, C. (2009). Getting students more learning time online: Distance education in support of expanded learning time in K-12 schools. Retrieved from
  9. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K., Bosnick, J., & Hess, M. (2008). Effectiveness of online algebra learning: Implications for teacher preparation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED489533).Google Scholar
  11. Christle, C., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, M. (2007). School characteristics related to high school dropout rates. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 325–339. doi:  10.1177/07419325070280060201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, T. (2007). Virtual and distance education in North American schools. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 473–490). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital [supplement]. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cotton, K. (1996). Affective and social benefits of small-scale schooling. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED401088).Google Scholar
  15. Dickson, W. P. (2005). Toward a deeper understanding of student performance in virtual high school courses: Using quantitative analyses and data visualization to inform decision making. Unpublished manuscript, College of Education, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  16. Dietz, T. L. (2002). Predictors of success in large enrollment introductory courses: An examination of the impact of learning communities and virtual learning resources on student success in an introductory level sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 30, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duckworth, A., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls an edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198–208. doi:  10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunn, C., Chambers, D., & Rabren, K. (2004). Variables affecting students’ decision to drop out of school. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 314–323. doi:  10.1177/07419325040250050501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferdig, R. E., Papanastasiou, E., & DiPietro, M. (2005). Teaching and learning in collaborative virtual high schools. In R. Smith, T. Clark, & B. Blomeyer (Eds.), A synthesis of new research in K-12 online learning (pp. 31–33). Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Florida Tax Watch. (2007). Final report: A comprehensive assessment of Florida Virtual School. Retrieved from
  21. Fulk, B. (2003). Concerns about ninth grade students’ poor academic performance: One schools action plan. American Secondary Education, 31(2), 8–26.Google Scholar
  22. Hughes, J. E., McLeod, S., Brown, R., Maeda, Y., & Choi, J. (2005). Staff development and student perceptions of the learning environment in virtual and traditional secondary schools. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? (Report No. IP-202). Retrieved from
  24. Kortering, L., & Braziel, P. (1999). School dropout from the perspective of former students: Implications for secondary special education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 78–83. doi:  10.1177/074193259902000203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu, F., & Cavanaugh, C. (2011). High enrollment course success factors in virtual school: Factors influencing student academic achievement. International Journal on E-Learning, 10, 393–418.Google Scholar
  26. McLoyd, V. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development.American Psychologist, 53(2). 185–204.Google Scholar
  27. National Longitudinal Transition Study 2. (2005). High school completion by youth with disabilities. Retrieved from
  28. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet based distance education. Retrieved from
  29. Picciano, A., & Seaman, J. (2009). K-12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up of the survey of U.S. school district administrators. Retrieved from
  30. Project Tomorrow. (2010). Creating our future: Students speak up about their vision for 21st century learning. Retrieved from
  31. Repetto, J., Cavanaugh, C., Wayer, N., & Liu, F. (2010). Virtual high schools: Improving outcomes for students with disabilities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11, 91–104.Google Scholar
  32. Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic–extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165–185. doi:  10.1007/BF00991650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rocha, E. (2007). Choosing more time for students: The what, why, and how of expanded learning. Retrieved from
  34. Ronsisvalle, T., & Watkins, R. (2005). Student success in online K-12 education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 117–124.Google Scholar
  35. Rose, R. M., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2007). Access and equity in online classes and virtual schools. Retrieved from
  36. Rourke, J. R. (2001). The ninth grade experiment. Principal Leadership, 1(7), 26–30.Google Scholar
  37. Scanlon, D., & Mellard, D. (2002). Academic and participation profiles of school-age dropouts with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 239–258.Google Scholar
  38. Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 4(2). Retrieved from
  39. Sims, R. (1997). Interactivity: A forgotten art? Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 157–180. doi:  10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00004-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and student achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. doi:  10.3102/00346543075003417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, J. S., Akos, E., Lim, S., & Wiley, S. (2008). Student and stakeholder perceptions of the transition to high school. The High School Journal, 91(3), 32–42. doi:  10.1353/hsj.2008.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smouse, T. (2005). Students with either specific learning disabilities or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Perceptions of self as learning in online courses at Florida Virtual School in the traditional learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  43. Stevens, J. (2008). Differentiation through math class acceleration. Florida League of Middle Schools Journal, Spring, 23–27.Google Scholar
  44. Talvitie-Siple, J. (2007). Studentsmotivation to learn: An evaluation of perceptions, pedagogy, and design in one e-learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, W. R. (2008). Do online courses work for middle grades and high school students? Online students have their say. Retrieved from
  46. Ungerleider, C., & Burns, T. (2003). A systematic review of the effectiveness and efficiency of networked ICT in education: A state of the field report. Retrieved from
  47. Wallace, P. (2009). Distance learning for gifted students: Outcomes for elementary, middle, and high school aged students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 295–320.Google Scholar
  48. Wang, S.-K., & Reeves, T. (2007). The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 169–192. doi:  10.1007/s11423-006-9016-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson, J., Gemin, B., Ryan, J., & Wicks, M. (2009). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Retrieved from
  50. Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2011). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Retrieved from
  51. Watson, J. W., & Gemin, B. (2008). Promising practices in online learning: Using online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. Retrieved from
  52. Weber, C., & Smith, D. (2010). Meeting the needs of gifted students through online programs. Distance Learning, 7(2), 43–50.Google Scholar
  53. WestEd. (2008). Evaluating online learning: Challenges and strategies for success (Report No. ED-01-CO-0012). Retrieved from
  54. Wicks, M. (2010). A national primer on K-12 online learning, Version 2. Retrieved from
  55. Zucker, A. (2005). A study of student interaction and collaboration in the virtual high school. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations