Abstract
This chapter addresses, from various perspectives, issues associated with teacher education and its development. Several categories of mathematics educators are characterized and their development and roles in the teaching/learning processes are summarized. Cooperation between teachers and researchers as well as the concept of teachers as researchers are discussed from different points of view. The crucial role that observations play at all levels is analyzed and illustrated by two different models of implementation of observations into teachers’ and researchers’ practice. Throughout the chapter the influence of the research of Guy Brousseau on mathematics education research is recognized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotná, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 359–381.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 7, 245–274.
Breen, C. (2003). Mathematics teachers as researchers: Living on the edge? In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 523–544). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brousseau, G. (1989). Utilité et intérêt de la didactique des mathématiques pour un professeur de collège. Petit x, 21, 47–68.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics 1970–1990. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brousseau, G. (2002). Cobayes et microbes (G. Warfield, Trans.). Electronic discussion.
Brousseau, G., & Warfield, V. M. (1999). The Case of Gaël. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(1), 7–52.
Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2001). An experiment on the teaching of statistics and probability. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(3), 363–411.
Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, G. (2002). An experiment on the teaching of statistics and probability. Joumal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 1–20.
Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2004a). Rationals and decimals as required in the school curriculum. Part 1: Rationals as measurement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 363–411.
Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2004b). Rationals and decimals as required in the school curriculum: Part 1: Rationals as measurement. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(1), 1–20.
Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2007). Rationals and decimals as required in the school curriculum: Part 2: From rationals to decimals. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(4), 281–300.
Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2008). Rationals and decimals as required in the school curriculum: Part 3. Rationals and decimals as linear functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(3), 153–176.
Brousseau, G., Brousseau, N., & Warfield, V. (2009). Rationals and decimals as required in the school curriculum: Part 4: Problem solving, composed mappings and division. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(2–3), 79–118.
Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2000). Same/different: A “natural” way of learning mathematics. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 113–120). Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.
Carr, W. (1995). For education: Towards a critical educational inquiry. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Cavanagh, M., & Prescott, A. (2007). Professional experience in learning to teach secondary mathematics: Incorporating pre-service teachers into a community of practice. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (pp. 182–191). Adelaide, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Chapman, O. (2008). Mathematics teacher educators’ learning from research on their instructional practices: A cognitive perspective. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 4, pp. 110–129). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
Clarke, D. (1999). The Learner’s Perspective Study: Research design. Retrieved from http://extranet.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/DSME/lps/.
Clarke, D. (2001). Complementary accounts methodology. In D. Clarke (Ed.), Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classrooms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Clarke, D. J., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
Douady, R. (1991). Tool, object, setting, window elements for analysing and constructing didactical situations in mathematics. In A. Bishop, S. Mellin-Olsen, & J. van Dormolen (Eds.), Knowledge: Its growth through teaching (pp. 109–130). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30.
Fuglestad, A. B. (2011). Challenges teachers face with integrating ICT with an inquiry approach in mathematics. In CERME 7, Working Group 15. Retrieved April 9, 2011, from http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/15a/CERME7-WG15A-Paper02_Fuglestad.pdf.
Goos, M. (2008). Critique and transformation in researcher-teacher relationships in mathematics education. Symposium on the Occasion of the 100th Anniversary of ICMI. Retrieved from http://www.unige.ch/math/EnsMath/Rome2008/partWG3.html.
Goos, M., Brown, L., Chapman, O., & Novotná, J. (2010). The learning and development of mathematics teacher educator-researchers. In M. Pinto & T. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 34 (1st ed., p. 390). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
Goos, M., Brown, L., Chapman, O., & Novotná, J. (2011). The learning and development of mathematics teacher educator-researchers. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (1st ed., p. 173). Ankara, Turkey: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Jančařík, A., & Novotná, J. (2011). Potential of CAS for development of mathematical thinking. In M. Kováčová (Ed.), Aplimat 2011 (pp. 1375–1384). Bratislava, Slovakia: STU.
Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnerships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(2–3), 249–282.
Kinach, B. M. (2002). A cognitive strategy for developing pedagogical content knowledge in the secondary mathematics methods course: Toward a model of effective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 51–71.
Lagrange, J.-B. (2011). Working with teachers: Collaboration in a community around innovative software. In CERME 7, Working Group 15. Retrieved from http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/15a/CERME7-WG15A-Paper24_Lagrange.pdf.
Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 429–459). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Margolinas, C. (2002). Situations, milieux, connaissances: Analyse de l’activité du professeur. In J.-L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot, & R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11ème Ecole d’Eté de Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 141–156). Grenoble: France La Pensée Sauvage.
Margolinas, C., Coulange, L., & Bessot, A. (2005). What can the teacher learn in the classroom? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1–3), 205–304.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technology pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
Morin, E. (1999). La tête bien faite—Repenser la réforme, réformer la pensée. Paris, France: Ed. du Seuil.
Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529.
Nathan, M. J., & Petrosino, A. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 905–928.
Nichols, S. I., & Berliner, D. C. (2005). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nieto, L. J. B. (1996). Learning to teach mathematics: Types of knowledge. In J. Giménez, S. Llinares, & V. Sánchez (Eds.), Becoming a primary teacher: Issues from mathematics education (pp. 159–177). Sevilla, Spain: Gracia Alvarez.
Novotná, J., Lebethe, A., Rosen, G., & Zack, V. (2003). Navigating between theory and practice: Teachers who navigate between their research and their practice. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 27/PME NA 25 (Vol. 1, pp. 69–99). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i.
Novotná, J., Zack, V., Rosen, G., Lebethe, A., Brown, L., & Breen, C. (2006). RF01: Teachers researching with university academics. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the 30th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 95–124). Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Salin, M.-H., & Dreslard Nédélec, D. (1999). La collaboration entre chercheurs et enseignants dans un dispositif original d’observation de classes: Le centre d’observation et de recherche sur l’enseignement des mathématiques (COREM). In F. Jaquet (Ed.), Relations between classroom practice and research in mathematics education, Proceedings CIEAEM 50 (pp. 24–37). Neuchâtel, Switzerland: IRDP.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–140.
Sarrazy, B. (2002). Effects of variability on responsiveness to the didactic contract in problem-solving among pupils of 9–10 years. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17(4), 321–341.
Sarrazy, B. (2009, December). Les évaluations internationales et leurs effets sur l’enseignement des mathématiques. Tangente Education [La didactique des mathématiques], 11, 9.
Sarrazy, B., & Novotná, J. (2005). Didactical contract: Theoretical frame for the analysis of phenomena of teaching mathematics. In J. Novotná (Ed.), Proceedings SEMT 05 (pp. 33–44). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119–150.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Stehlíková, N. (2007). Charakteristika kultury vyučování matematice. In A. Hošpesová, N. Stehlíková, & M. Tichá (Eds.) Cesty zdokonalování kultury vyučování matematice (pp. 13–48) [Characteristics of the culture of mathematics teaching, in Czech]. České Budějovice: JČU.
Stengers, I. (1995). L’invention des sciences modernes. Paris, France: Flammarion.
Vacc, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers’ changing beliefs and instructional use of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89–110.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published 1934).
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Grammaire philosophique (A.-M. Lecourret, Trans.). Paris, France: Gallimard.
Wittgenstein, L. (1983). Remarques sur les fondements des mathématiques. Paris, France: Gallimard.
Zack, V., & Graves, B. (2001). Making mathematical meaning through dialogue: “Once you think of it, the z minus three seems pretty weird.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1–3), 229–271.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Novotná, J., Margolinas, C., Sarrazy, B. (2012). Developing Mathematics Educators. In: Clements, M., Bishop, A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F. (eds) Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 27. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4683-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4684-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)