Skip to main content

The Research, Development, Commercialization, and Adoption of Drought and Stress-Tolerant Crops

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crop Improvement Under Adverse Conditions

Abstract

Drought- and stress-tolerant crops will be one of the most significant factors to drive future agricultural productivity growth, by maintaining yields under suboptimal conditions, expanding production into marginal lands, and encouraging adoption of other complementary yield-enhancing technologies. Historically, genetic innovation has not concentrated as much on stabilizing yields as it has on increasing mean yields under optimal conditions. As a result, the market adoption of stress-tolerant varieties, and by extension, decisions about the research and development (R&D) and commercial release of such crops may be less informed by prevailing experience. To aid scientists and decision-makers, this chapter provides a brief characterization of the main institutional and economic contours of the crop genetics R&D and commercialization processes, including the selection dynamics of the R&D pipeline, relative roles of public- and private-sector institutions, and decision-making under uncertainty, including technological, intellectual property, regulatory, and market uncertainty. Factors affecting adoption of yield-enhancing technologies by farmers are explored, including (a) complementary technologies, (b) competing technologies, (c) appeal to first-time users, (d) distribution and timing of benefits to users, and (e) social perceptions of the technology.

An empirical ‘first look’ at the stress tolerance R&D pipeline is constructed from four datasets covering different phases of R&D: (a) research articles, (b) patents, (c) field trials, and (d) regulatory submissions. The analysis reveals rapid growth in the early stages, but sparse and uneven development across countries closer to market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston JM, Andersen MA, James JS, Pardey PG (2010) Persistence pays US agricultural productivity growth and the benefits from public R&D spending. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Approved Products (2011).http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/gmf-agm/appro/index-eng.php. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD (2008) Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Cr Rev Plant Sci 27:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (2010) The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett D (2011) Agribusiness: Pioneer releases drought-tolerant corn hybrids. Delta Farm Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Binenbaum E, Nottenburg C, Pardey PG, Wright BD, Zambrano P (2003) South-North trade, intellectual property jurisdictions, and freedom to operate in agricultural research on staple crops. Econ Dev Cult Change 51(2):309–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BioTrack Product Database (2011). http://www2.oecd.org/biotech/. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Brossard D, Shanahan J, Nesbitt TC (eds) (2007) The public, the media and agricultural biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BRS Public Data File (2011). http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/status/BRS_public_data_file.xls. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Cahoon RS (2007) Licensing agreements in agricultural biotechnology. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW et al (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res 105(1–2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ComissaoTecnica Nacional de Biosseguranca MdC (2011) Tecnologia e Inovacao. CTNBio. 2011; http://www.ctnbio.gov.br/index.php. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Crops No Longer Regulated By USDA (Petitions for De-Regulation) (2011). http://www.isb.vt.edu/search-petition-data.aspx. Accessed 1 Jul 201l1

  • CTNBio-Commercial Approvals-Crops (2011) http://www.ctnbio.gov.br/index.php/content/view/12492.html. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Deliberate release into the environment of GMOs for any other purposes than placing on the market (experimental releases) (2011) http://gmoinfo.jrc.ec.europa.eu/gmp_browse.aspx. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • EU register of genetically modified food and feed (2011). http://ec.europa.eu/food/dyna/gm_register/index_en.cfm. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D (1985) Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey. Econ Dev Cult Change 33(2):255–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton GM, Chi-Ham C, Boettiger S (2007) Freedom to operate: The law firm’s approach and role. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Foods and Food Additives Produced by Recombinant DNA Techniques (2011) http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/food/. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Frey KJ (1998) National plant breeding study-III: National plan for genepool enrichment of US crops: Iowa agriculture and home economics experiment station. Special Report 101

    Google Scholar 

  • Genetically modified (GM) foods (2011) http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/gmfoods/. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Gepts P (2004) Crop domestication as a long-term selection experiment. Plant Breeding Rev 24(2):1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • GM Approvals Database (2011) http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/default.asp. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • GM Crop Database (2011) http://cera-gmc.org/index.php?action=gm_crop_database. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Graff GD, Cullen SE, Bradford KJ, Zilberman D, Bennett AB (2003) The public-private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 21(9):989–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graff GD, Hochman G, Zilberman D (2009) The political economy of agricultural biotechnology policies. AgBioForum 12(1):34–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell PBR (2002) Green revolution: Curse or blessing?. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Wang Q (2002) Agricultural biotechnology development and policy in China. AgBioForum 5(4):122–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Information on PNTs Approved for Confined or Unconfined Release in Canada (2011) http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/bio/pbopnte.shtml. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Jain SM (eds) (2007) Advances in molecular breeding towards drought and salt tolerant crops. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Juarez B, Branson A (2011) Mexico agricultural biotechnology annual: Mexico authorizes first commercial biotech cultivation. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), Unites States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Krattiger A (2007) Freedom to operate, public sector research, and product-development partnerships: Strategies and risk-management options. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser WH (2007) Plant breeders’ rights: An introduction. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • List of applications and licences for Dealings involving Intentional Release (DIR) of GMOs into the environment (2011) http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/ir-1. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Liu Q, Chen Y-Q (2010) A new mechanism in plant engineering: The potential roles of microRNAs in molecular breeding for crop improvement. Biotechnol Adv 28(3):301–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livne O (2007) Cost-Conscious strategies for patent application filings. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) (2007) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • LMO of which Type 1 Use Regulation is approved under the Cartagena Protocol domestic Law (2011) http://www.bch.biodic.go.jp/english/lmo.html. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Lybbert TJ, Bell A (2010) Stochastic benefit streams, learning, and technology diffusion: Why drought tolerance is not the new Bt. Agbioforum 13:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittler R (2006) Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci 11(1):15–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen L, Krattiger A (2007) Ensuring developing-country access to new inventions: The role of patents and the power of public sector research institutions. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M (2007) The in- and out-licensing of plant varieties. In Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg R (2008) Starved for science: How biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehu E, Ragasa C (2007) Agricultural biotechnology: Transgenics in agriculture and their implications for developing countries. Washington DC: Background paper for the World Development Report 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds Inc (1994) (United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plants Evaluated for Environmental and Livestock Feed Safety (2011) http://active.inspection.gc.ca/eng/plaveg/bio/pntvcne.asp. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Qaim M, Zilberman D (2003) Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Sci 299(5608):900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal D et al (2007) Challenge of biofuel: Filling the tank without emptying the stomach? Environ Res Lett 2(4):044004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Cai X, Cline SA (2002) World water and food to 2025: Dealing with scarcity. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovere RL, Kostandini G, Abdoulaye T et al (2009) Potential impact of investments in drought tolerant maize in Africa. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco

    Google Scholar 

  • Salekdeh GH, Reynolds M, Bennett J, Boyer J (2009) Conceptual framework for drought phenotyping during molecular breeding. Trends Plant Sci 14(9):488–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana K (2007) In-licensing strategies by public-sector institutions in developing countries. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton S, Zilberman D (2011) Land for food and fuel production: The role of agricultural biotechnology. In: Graff-Zivin JS, Perloff JM (eds) The intended and unintended effects of US agricultural and biotechnology policies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR (2011) Challenges in breeding for yield increase for drought. Trends Plant Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • Status of GMOs and Products – Agricultural applications – Transgenic crops under development and field trials (2011a) http://igmoris.nic.in/field_trials.asp. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Status of GMOs and Products – Agriculture Applications – Commercially approved (2011b) http://igmoris.nic.in/commercial_approved.asp. Accessed 1 Jul 2011

  • Sunding D, Zilberman D (2001) The agricultural innovation process: Understanding research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector. In: Gardner BL, Rausser GC (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, Vol 1. Elsevier Science, New York, p. 207–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Syngenta Rolling Out Drought-Tolerant Corn (2011) Cuts Losses 15 %. Dow Jones Newswire. March 17, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MR, Tick JS (2001) The StarLink case: Issues for the future. Resources for the Future, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler G, Falckzepeda J, Ortizmonasterio JI, Sayre K (1995) Production risk and the evolution of varietal technology. Am J Agr Econ 77(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigo E, Cap E, Malach V, Villarreal F (2009) The case of zero-tillage technology in Argentina. International Food Policy Research Institutes (IFPRI), Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Trostle R (2008) Global agricultural supply and demand: Factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices. Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R, Cunningham S (2007) Filing and defending patents in different jurisdictions. In: Krattiger A, Mahoney R, Nelsen L et al (eds) Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR and PIPRA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was supported, in part, by NIH grant R01HG004041 (Graff). Zilberman is a member of the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Graff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Graff, G., Hochman, G., Zilberman, D. (2013). The Research, Development, Commercialization, and Adoption of Drought and Stress-Tolerant Crops. In: Tuteja, N., Gill, S. (eds) Crop Improvement Under Adverse Conditions. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4633-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics