Advertisement

Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design

  • Igor S. Mayer
  • C. Els van Daalen
  • Pieter W. G. Bots
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 179)

Abstract

As made clear by the discussion in  Chap. 2, policy analysis is a multifaceted field in which a variety of different activities and ambitions have found a place. Some policy analysts conduct quantitative or qualitative research, while others reconstruct and analyze political discourse or set up citizen fora.

Keywords

Policy Analysis Policy Problem Freight Transport Interactive Style Policy Analyst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beall A, Bourget E, Hagen E, Kudlas S, Langsdale S, Palmer R, Tate D, Werick WJ (2011) Collaborative modeling for decision support in water resources: principles and best practices. Institute for Water Resources, IWR Report 2011-R-03, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobrow D, Dryzek J (1987) Policy analysis by design. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer G, DeLeon P (1983) The foundations of policy analysis. Dorsey, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardwell H, Langsdale S, Stephenson K (2009) The shared vision planning primer: how to incorporate computer aided dispute resolution in water resources planning. Institute for Water Resources, IWR Report 08-R-02, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  5. de Bruijn J, ten Heuvelhof E (2000) Networks and decision-making. Lemma, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. de Bruijn J, ten Heuvelhof E, In’t Veld R (2002) Process management, why project management fails in complex decision-making processes. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. DeLeon P (1988) Advice and consent; the development of the policy sciences. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLeon P (1994) Democracy and the policy sciences: aspirations and operations. Policy Stud J 22:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dror Y (1967) Policy analysts: a new professional role in government service. Public Adm Rev 27(3):198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dryzek J (1990) Discursive democracy; politics, policy and political science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunn W (1982) Reforms as arguments. Knowldge, Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 3(3):293–326Google Scholar
  12. Dunn W (1994) Public policy analysis: an introduction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  13. Durning D (1993) Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: a case study. J Policy Anal Manag 12(2):297–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durning D, Osuna W (1994) Policy analysts roles and value orientations: an empirical investigation using Q methodology’. J Policy Anal Manag 13(44):629–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edelenbos J (1999) Design and management of participatory public policymaking. Public Manag 1(4):569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer F (1990) Technocracy and the politics of expertise. SAGE, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer F, Forester J (eds) (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham Google Scholar
  18. Fischer F (1995) Evaluating public policy. Nelson-Hall, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts and the environment. The politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  20. Fishkin J (1991) Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  21. Goeller B (1988) A framework for evaluating success in systems analysis. In: Miser HJ, Quade ES (eds) Handbook of systems analysis: craft issues and procedural choices. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  22. Goeller B et al (1977) Protecting an estuary from floods: a policy analysis of the oosterschelde, vol I, Summary Report, Report R-2121/1-NETH, RAND, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  23. Guba E, Lincoln Y (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawkesworth M (1988) Theoretical issues in policy analysis. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillestad RJ et al (1996) FORWARD—freight options for road, water, and rail for the Dutch: final report, Report MR-736-EAC/VW, RAND Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  26. Hogwood B, Gunn L (1984) Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoppe R (1998) Policy analysis, science, and politics: from ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together. Sci Public Policy 26(3):201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. House P, Shull R (1991) The practice of policy analysis; forty years of art and technology. Compass, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch. Science advisors as policymakers. Harvard, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins-Smith H (1982) Professional roles of policy analysts. Int J Policy Anal Manag 2(1):88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joss S, Belluci S (2002) Participatory technology assessment, European perspectives. Centre for the Study of Democracy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawlor E (1996) Book review of ‘The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning’ by F. Fischer and J. Forester’. Int J Policy Anal Manag 15(1):110–146Google Scholar
  33. Lerner D, Lasswell H (eds) (1951) The policy sciences, recent developments in scope and methods. Stanford University Press, Stanford CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  34. Lynn L (1999) A place at the table: policy analysis, its postpositive critics, and the future of practice. Int J Policy Anal Manag 18(3):411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacRae D, Whittington D (1997) Expert advice for policy choice: analysis and discourse. Georgetown University Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  36. Mason R, Mitroff I (1981) Challenging strategic planning assumptions. Theory, cases and techniques. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayer IS (1997) Debating technologies: a methodological contribution to the design and evaluation of participatory policy analysis. Tilburg University Press, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayer IS, Bots PWG, van Daalen CE (2004) Perspectives on policy analysis: a framework for understanding and design. Int J Technol Policy Manag 4(2):169–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Midgley G, Ochoa-Arias AE (eds) (2004) Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  40. Miser HJ, Quade ES (eds) (1985) Handbook of systems analysis: overview of uses, procedures, applications, and practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  41. Patton C, Sawicki D (1986) Basic methods of policy analysis and planning. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  42. Quade ES (1989) Analysis for public decisions, 3rd edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Radin B (1997) Presidential address: the evolution of the policy analysis field: from conversation to conversations. Int J Policy Anal Manag 16(2):204–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rijkswaterstaat (1983) Lozing van Afvalstoffen van de Titaandioxide-Industrie in Zee, Directie Noordzee, Dienst Informatievoorziening (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  45. Rotmans J (1990) IMAGE: an integrated model to assess the greenhouse effect. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shulock N (1999) The paradox of policy analysis: if it is not used, why do we produce so much of it? J Policy Anal Manag 18(2):226–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thissen WAH, Twaalfhoven PGJ (2001) Towards a conceptual structure for evaluating policy analytic activities. Eur J Oper Res 129(3):627–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Timmermans JS (2004) Purposive interaction in multi-actor decision making: operationalising Coleman’s linear system of action for policy decision support. Ph.D. Thesis, Eburon, DelftGoogle Scholar
  49. Twaalfhoven P (1999) The success of policy analysis studies: an actor perspective. Ph.D. Thesis, Eburon, DelftGoogle Scholar
  50. van Daalen CE, Dresen L, Janssen M (2002) The roles of computer models in the environmental policy life cycle. Environ Sci Policy 5(3):221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Eeten M (2001) Recasting intractable policy issues: the wider implications of The Netherlands civil aviation controversy. Int J Policy Anal Manag 20(3):391–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker WE (1988) Generating and screening alternatives. In: Miser HJ, Quade ES (eds) Handbook of systems analysis: craft issues and procedural choices. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker WE (2000) Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector. J Multicriteria Decision Anal 9(1–3):11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker WE (2009) Does the best practice of rational-style model-based policy analysis already include ethical considerations? Omega 37(6):1051–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weimer D, Vining A (1992) Policy analysis: concepts and practice. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiss C, Bucuvalas M (1980) Social science research and decision-making. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. White L (1994) Policy analysis as discourse. J Policy Anal Manag 13(3):506–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wildavsky A (1987) Speaking truth to power; the art and craft of policy analysis. Transaction Books, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor S. Mayer
    • 1
  • C. Els van Daalen
    • 1
  • Pieter W. G. Bots
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations