E-Health Readiness Assessment Methodology (EHRAM)

Part of the Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age book series (Healthcare Delivery Inform. Age)


E-Health is an application of information and communication technologies to promote healthcare services support, delivery and education. However, the implementation of E-Health represents a potentially disruptive change in the healthcare context. Consequently, resistance to change can occur at the individual level as well as at the organisational level. Prior to E-Health implementation, assessment of organisational readiness can reduce the risk of its failure after introduction. The success of an E-Health system is very much dependent on the success of the Electronic Health Records (EHR) system, as EHR forms the core of any E-Health system. This chapter (based on design science research methodology) presents an E-Health Readiness Assessment Methodology (EHRAM) from EHR perspective, which deals with the factors that need to be addressed in the planning of E-Health programmes and assists decision makers in the healthcare organisation to take action to address deficient areas of the readiness. EHRAM encompasses: (1) an E-Health Readiness Assessment Framework (EHRAF), (2) an assessment process, (3) data mining techniques for analysing the assessment data to arrive at a readiness score and (4) an automated tool for the implementation of EHRAM.


Design science E-Health Evaluation Methodology Readiness EHR 



This study sincerely acknowledges the direct/indirect contributions of members of the WHO eHCD project.


  1. Allan, J., & Englebright, J. (2000). Patient-centered documentation: An effective and efficient use of clinical information systems. Journal of Nursing Administration, 30, 90–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, J. D., Harris, K. D., & Hodge, R. (2001). Introducing telemedicine technology to rural physicians and settings. The Journal of Family Practice, 50, 419–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cronbach, L. J., et al. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Dean, J. (2000). An evaluation method for COTS software products. Proceeding of the 12th Annual Software Technology Conference (STC), May, Saltake City, Utah, USA.Google Scholar
  5. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.Google Scholar
  7. Demiris, G., Oliver, D. R. P., Porock, D., & Courtney, K. (2004). Home telehealth: The Missouri telehospice project: Background and next steps. Home Health Care Technology Report, 1, 49, 55–57.Google Scholar
  8. Dickinson, G., Fischetti, L., & Heard, S. (2004). HL EHR system functional model: Draft standard for trial use. Accessed 12 Sept 2008.
  9. Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? (editorial). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 1(2), e20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gagnon, M. P., & Scott, R. E. (2005). Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: Lessons from health technology assessment. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 11(Suppl. 2), 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–106.Google Scholar
  13. ISO Technical Report (ISO-TR20514) Health Informatics, Electronic Health Record, Definition, Scope, and Context. Clause 4.4.Google Scholar
  14. Jennett, P., Jackson, A., Healy, T., Kazanjian, A., Woollard, R., Haydt, S., & Bates, J. (2002). Alliance for building capacity—framework for remote and rural readiness in telehealth. Final Report for CANARIE.,%20Appendix%20A.htm. Accessed 04 Nov 2008.
  15. Jennett, P., Jackson, A., Healy, T., Ho, K., Kazanjian, A., Woollard, R., et al. (2003). A study of a rural community’s readiness for telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, 259–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jennett, P., Yeo, M., Pauls, M., & Graham, J. (2004). Organizational readiness for telemedicine: Implications for success and failure. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9(Suppl. 2), S27–S30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennett, P., Jackson, A., Ho, K., Healy, T., Kazanjian, A., Woollard, R., et al. (2005). The essence of telehealth readiness in rural communities: An organizational perspective. Journal of Telemedicine and e-Health, 11, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khoja, S., Scott, R., Ishaq, A., & Mohsin, M. (2007). eHealth international journal. Testing reliability of eHealth readiness assessment tools for developing countries. e-Health International Journal, 3(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
  19. Li, J., Land, L., & Ray, P. (2008a). Humanitarian Technology Challenge (HTC)—electronic health records perspective. A Report of Joint Project of IEEE and United Nations Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Li, J., Land, L., Chattopadhyay, S., & Ray, P. (2008b). An approach for e-health system assessment & specification. IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Application & Services, 7–9 July 2008, Singapore.Google Scholar
  21. Manning, M. L., & Munro, D. (2006). The Survey researcher’s SPSS Cookbook. Australia: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  22. March, S. T., & Smith, G. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menachemi, N., Lee, S. C., Shepherd, J. E., & Brooks, R. G. (2006). Proliferation of electronic health records among obstetrician-gynecologists. Quality Management in Health Care (Qual Manage Health Care), 15(3), 150–156.Google Scholar
  24. Nunamaker, J., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M. (1991). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89–106.Google Scholar
  25. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Ray, P. K. (2003). Integrated management from e-business perspective, concepts, architectures and methodologies. New York: Kluwer, Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. US General Accounting Office, Program Evaluation and Methodology Division. (1990). Case study evaluations. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. Watson, P. J. (2006). Electronic health records—manual for developing countries., + EHR + adoption + developing + countries. Accessed 28 Feb 2008.
  32. Watts, C., & Ibegbulam, I. (2005). Access to electronic healthcare information resources in developing countries: Experiences from the Medical Library, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria., Accessed 19 Sept 2007.
  33. WHO. (2005). e-Health Report by Secretariat. 58th World Health Assembly A58/21, April.Google Scholar
  34. WHO. (2006). The global shortage of health workers and its impact. Accessed 06 Oct 2009.
  35. Wickramasinghe, N. S., Fadlalla, A. M. A., Geisler, E., & Schaffer, J. L. (2005). A framework for assessing e-health preparedness. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 1(3), 62–81.Google Scholar
  36. Yin, K. R. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asia Pacific u-Health Research Centre (APuHC)School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, The University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations