Advertisement

Optimization Models for the Three-Dimensional Container Loading Problem with Practical Constraints

  • Leonardo Junqueira
  • Reinaldo Morabito
  • Denise Sato Yamashita
  • Horacio Hideki Yanasse
Chapter
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 73)

Abstract

The last decades have seen an increasing emergence of solution approaches to three-dimensional container loading problems. Starting from simple constructive algorithms and passing through sophisticated metaheuristics, the container loading literature offers a range of solving options. However, few authors have engaged themselves in proposing optimization models to deal with container loading problems that aim to pack the largest volume (or value) of rectangular boxes orthogonally inside a single container. In this sense, studies are even scarcer when practical constraints are considered. Cargo stability, load bearing strength of the boxes, and multi-drop situations, among others, are constraints that have important practical claim and should be considered in order to model more realistic situations. In this chapter we are concerned with presenting mixed integer linear programming models for container loading problems that consider vertical and horizontal stability of the cargo, load bearing strength of the boxes, and multi-drop situations, besides the non-overlapping of boxes. Computational results achieved with a modeling language and an optimization solver, comparing the performance of the models on instances from the literature, are also presented and discussed. Finally, we discuss some potential directions for future works in this area.

Keywords

Three-dimensional container loading Mathematical modeling Cargo stability Load bearing Multi-dropping 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by FAPESP, CAPES, and CNPq.

References

  1. 1.
    Beasley, J.E.: An exact two-dimensional non-guillotine cutting tree search procedure. Oper. Res. 33(1), 49–64 (1985)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beasley, J.E.: A population heuristic for constrained two-dimensional non-guillotine cutting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(3), 601–627 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bischoff, E.E.: Three-dimensional packing of items with limited load bearing strength. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 168(3), 952–966 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bischoff, E.E., Ratcliff, M.S.W.: Issues in the development of approaches to container loading. Omega 23(4), 377–390 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bortfeldt, A., Gehring, H.: A hybrid genetic algorithm for the container loading problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131(1), 143–161 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bortfeldt, A., Gehring, H., Mack, D.: A parallel tabu search algorithm for solving the container loading problem. Parallel Comput. 29(5), 641–662 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bortfeldt, A., Wäscher, G.: Container loading problems - a state-of-the-art review. Magdeburg: Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg. Working Paper No. 7/2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, C.S., Lee, S.M., Shen, Q.S.: An analytical model for the container loading problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80(1), 68–76 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christensen, S.G., Rousoe, D.M.: Container loading with multi-drop constraints. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 16(6), 727–743 (2009)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christofides, N., Whitlock, C.: An algorithm for two-dimensional cutting problems. Oper. Res. 25(1), 30–44 (1977)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dyckhoff, H.: A typology of cutting and packing problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 44(2), 145–159 (1990)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eley, M.: Solving container loading problems by block arrangement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141(2), 393–409 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fasano, G.: MIP-based heuristic for non-standard 3D-packing problems. 4OR 6(3), 291–310 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fasano, G.: A global optimization point of view to handle non-standard object packing problems. J. Global Optim. (2012). doi:10.1007/s10898-012-9865-8 (to appear)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gehring, H., Bortfeldt, A.: A parallel genetic algorithm for solving the container loading problem. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 9(4), 497–511 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    George, J.A., Robinson, D.F.: A heuristic for packing boxes into a container. Comput. Oper. Res. 7(3), 147–156 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gilmore, P.C., Gomory, R.E.: Multistage cutting stock problems of two and more dimensions. Oper. Res. 13(1), 94–120 (1965)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gonçalves, J.F., Resende, M.G.C.: A parallel multi-population biased random-key genetic algorithm for a container loading problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(2), 179–190 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hadjiconstantinou, E., Christofides, N.: An exact algorithm for general, orthogonal, two-dimensional knapsack problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 83(1), 39–56 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang, W., He, K.: A caving degree approach for the single container loading problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res 196(1), 93–101 (2009)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jin, Z., Ohno, K., Du, J.: An efficient approach for the three-dimensional container packing problem with practical constraints. Asia-Pacific J. Oper. Res. 21(3), 279–295 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Junqueira, L., Morabito, R., Yamashita, D.S.: Three-dimensional container loading models with cargo stability and load bearing constraints. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(1), 74–85 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Junqueira, L., Morabito, R., Yamashita, D.S.: Mip-based approaches for the container loading problem with multi-drop constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. (2011). doi:10.1007/s10479-011-0942-z (to appear)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lai, K.K., Xue, J., Xu, B.: Container packing in a multi-customer delivering operation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 35(1–2), 323–326 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lins, L., Lins, S., Morabito, R.: An n-tet graph approach for non-guillotine packing of n-dimensional boxes into an n-container. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141(2), 421–439 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mack, D., Bortfeldt, A., Gehring, H.: A parallel hybrid local search algorithm for the container loading problem. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 11(5), 511–533 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morabito, R., Arenales, M.: An And/Or-graph approach to the container loading problem. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1(1), 59–73 (1994)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moura, A., Oliveira, J.F.: A GRASP approach to the container-loading problem. IEEE Intell. Syst. 4(20), 50–57 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parreño, F., Alvarez-Valdes, R., Oliveira, J.F., Tamarit, J.M.: Neighborhood structures for the container loading problem: a VNS implementation. J. Heurist. 16(1), 1–22 (2010)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pisinger, D.: Heuristics for the container loading problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141(2), 382–392 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ratcliff, M.S.W., Bischoff, E.E.: Allowing for weight considerations in container loading. OR Spektrum 20(1), 65–71 (1998)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silva, J.L.C., Soma, N.Y., Maculan, N.: A greedy search for the three-dimensional bin packing problem: the packing static stability case. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 10(2), 141–153 (2003)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tsai, R.D., Malstrom, E.M., Kuo, W.: Three dimensional palletization of mixed box sizes. IIE Trans. 25(4), 64–75 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang, Z., Li, K.W., Levy, J.K.: A heuristic for the container loading problem: a tertiary-tree-based dynamic space decomposition approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(1), 86–99 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wäscher, G., Haussner, H., Schumann, H.: An improved typology of cutting and packing problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183(3), 1109–1130 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yeung, L.H.W., Tang, W.K.S.: A hybrid genetic approach for container loading in logistics industry. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 52(2), 617–627 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Junqueira
    • 1
  • Reinaldo Morabito
    • 1
  • Denise Sato Yamashita
    • 1
  • Horacio Hideki Yanasse
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Engenharia de ProduçãoUniversidade Federal de São CarlosSão Carlos−São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais−INPE/LACSão José dos Campos−São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations