Anatomy and Physiology of the Farmed Animal

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Delivery Science and Technology book series (ADST)

Abstract

Most farmed animals have anatomical and physiological features that are in many ways similar to humans, but there are also important differences. This chapter assumes a basic understanding of mammalian structure and function and attempts to highlight the differences, particularly as they relate to drug delivery and metabolism. There is a conscious bias towards ruminant livestock, as they represent a major sector of the farmed animal population, and are the group that differ most from the monogastrics. More reading will be required for the reader wishing to develop specific bioactive delivery technologies per se, but this chapter aims to provide a sufficient understanding of the environment into which the drug is being introduced, and an explanation of the relevance of the (sometimes) unusual modes of administration for the reader more interested in the benefits to be gained from the treatment of livestock.

Keywords

Cellulose Formaldehyde Fermentation Dioxide Sulfide 

References

  1. 1.
    Richardson KC (1984) Forestomach motility in non-ruminant herbivores. In: Baker SK, Gawthorne JM, Mackintosh JB, Purser DB (eds) Ruminant physiology; concepts and consequences. University of Western Australia, Perth, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reid CSW (1982) Fibre and the digestive physiology of the ruminant stomach. In: Wallace G, Bell I (eds) Fibre in human and animal nutrition. Royal Society of New Zealand, Auckland, NZ, pp 43–49Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hume ID (1984) Evolution of herbivores—the ruminant in perspective. In: Baker SK, Gawthorne JM, Mackintosh JB, Purser DB (eds) Ruminant physiology; concepts and consequences. University of Western Australia, Perth, pp 15–25Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis D (1961) In: Lewis (ed) Digestive physiology and nutrition of the ruminant. Proceedings of University of Nottingham 7th Easter School in Agricultural Science, Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Soest PJ (1994) In: Van Soest PJ (ed) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cronje PJ (2000) In: Cronje PJ (ed) Ruminant physiology, digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction. University of Pretoria, South AfricaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cardinal JR (2000) Intraruminal controlled release boluses. In: Rathbone MJ, Gurny R (eds) Controlled release veterinary drug delivery: biological and pharmaceutical considerations, Chap. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 51–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rathbone MJ (1999) Veterinary applications. In: Mathiowitz E (ed) Encyclopedia of controlled drug delivery. Wiley, New York, pp 1006–1037Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vandamme ThF, Ellis KJ (2004) Issues and challenges in developing ruminal drug delivery systems. In: Rathbone M (ed) Advanced drug delivery reviews, vol 56. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1415–1436Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Annison EF, Lewis D (1959) In: Annison EF, Lews D (eds) Metabolism in the rumen. Methuen & Co, London, p 15Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costigan P, Ellis KJ (1980) Retention of copper oxide needles in cattle. Proc Aust Soc Anim Prod 13:451Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitehead L, Fell JT, Collett JH, Sharma HL, Smith AM (1998) Floating dosage forms: an in vivo study demonstrating prolonged gastric retention. J Control Release 55:3–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Senel S, McClure SJ (2004) Potential applications of chitosan in veterinary medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:1467–1480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baker SK (1984) The rumen as an eco-system. In: Baker SK, Gawthorne JM, Mackintosh JB, Purser DB (eds) Ruminant physiology; concepts and consequences. University of Western Australia, Perth, pp 149–160Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scott TW, Cook LJ, Ferguson KA, McDonald IW, Buchanan RA, Loftus Hills G (1970) Production of polyunsaturated milk fat in domestic ruminants. Aust J Sci 32:291–293Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott TW, Ashes JR (1993) Dietary lipids for ruminants: protection, utilization and effects on remodelling of skeletal muscle phospholipids. Aust J Agric Res 44:495–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Desai KGH, Park HJ (2005) Recent developments in microencapsulation of food ingredients. Drying Technol 23:1361–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Controlled Release Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ellis ConsultingArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations