Advertisement

Issues and Trends in Instructional Technology: Despite Lean Times, Continued Interest and Opportunity in K-12, Business, and Higher Education

  • Abbie Brown
  • Tim Green
Chapter
Part of the Educational Media and Technology Yearbook book series (EMTY, volume 37)

Abstract

This chapter is comprised of four sections: Overall Developments, Corporate Training and Development, Higher Education, and K-12 Education; this chapter synthesizes the findings of major annual reports including ASTD’s 2010 State of the Industry Report, the EDUCAUSE Core Data Service Fiscal Year 2009 Summary Report, The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010; Education Week’s Technology Counts 2011, The New Media Consortium and the Consortium for School Networkings’ The 2011 Horizon Report: K-12 Edition, and Project Tomorrow’s Speak Up National Findings Report, The New 3 E’s of Education: Enabled, engaged, Empowered; How Today’s Students are Leverage Emerging Technologies for Learning. The authors describe the economy’s impact on instructional technology and comment on the importance of online learning, the use of mobile devices (particularly, tablet computing, smart phones, and e-readers), the current state of online learning, and the continued interest in and use of Web 2.0—collaborative environments, in particular.

Keywords

Mobile Device Cloud Computing Educational Technology Augmented Reality Online Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, I. A., & Seaman, J. (2011). Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
  2. Arroway, P., Davenport, E., Xu, G. & Updegrove, D. (2010). EDUCAUSE core data service fiscal year 2009 summary report. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB8007.pdf.
  3. Ash, K. (2011). Gaming goes academic. Technology Counts, 30(25), 24, 28.Google Scholar
  4. Belissent, J., Mines, C., & Darashkevich, Y. (2011). Schools move beyond the basics: Competition will drive technology into the education market. Retrieved from http://www.forrester.com/rb/Research/schools_move_beyond_basics_competition_will_drive/q/id/58178/t/2.
  5. Brown, A., & Green, T. (2010). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Growth and maturation of web-based tools in a challenging climate; Social networks gain educators’ attention. In M. Orey, S. A. Jones, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 35, pp. 29–44). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A., & Green, T. (2011). Issues and trends in educational technology: Lean times, shifts in online learning, and increased attention to mobile devices. In M. Orey, S. A. Jones, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 36). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M. (2011). Credit-recovery lessons. Technology Counts, 30(25), 30, 32.Google Scholar
  8. Devaney, L. (2010). Economy continues to batter schools. eSchool News, 13(2), 1, 38.Google Scholar
  9. Education Week. (2010). Technology Counts, 29(26).Google Scholar
  10. Education Week. (2011). Teachers & technology, 30(25), 40–41.Google Scholar
  11. Hightower, A. M., (2009). Tracking U.S. trends: States earn B average for policies supporting educational technology use. Technology Counts 2009 , 28(26), 30–33.Google Scholar
  12. Horn, M., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of blended k-12 learning. Retrieved from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/media-room/publications/education-publications/the-rise-of-k-12-blended-learning/.
  13. Johnson, N., Oliff, P., & Williams, E. (2011). An update on state budget cuts. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1214.
  14. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2010). The 2010 Horizon report: K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011a). The 2011 Horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011b). The 2011 Horizon report: K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  17. Library Journal (2010). LJ/SLJ survey of ebook penetration & Use in U.S. school libraries. Retrieved from http://c0003264.cdn2.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/School%20Library%20Ebook%20Report_2.pdf.
  18. Manzo, K. (2010). Educators embrace iPods for learning. Education Week: Technology Counts 2010, 29(26), 16–17.Google Scholar
  19. Nagel, D. (2011). EETT eliminated in 2011 Obama budget proposal. T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/articles/2010/02/01/ed-tech-funding-eliminated-in-2011-obama-budget-proposal.aspx.
  20. Patel, L. (2010). 2010 state of the industry report: ASTD’s definitive review of workplace learning and development trends. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.Google Scholar
  21. Picciano, A., & Seamna, J. (2010). Class connections: High school reform and the role of online learning. Retrieved from http://www3.babson.edu/ESHIP/research-publications/upload/Class_connections.pdf.
  22. Project Tomorrow. (2011). Speak up 2010. Retrieved from http://www.tomorrow.org/SpeakUp/.
  23. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Robinson, L. K., Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2010). Security vs. Access: Balancing Safety and Productivity in the Digital School. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).Google Scholar
  26. Smith, S. D., & Borreson Caruso, J. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Science Instructional Technology EducationEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Elementary and Bilingual EducationCalifornia State UniversityFullertonUSA

Personalised recommendations