The Effects of Noise and Spatial Sampling on Identification of Material Parameters by Magnetic Resonance Elastography

  • N. Connesson
  • E. H. Clayton
  • P. V. Bayly
  • F. Pierron
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)


In-vivo measurement of the mechanical properties of soft tissues is challenging but may provide invaluable data in biomechanics and medicine. Different experimental techniques are currently used to measure 3D strain or displacements fields under static or dynamic loading. Different analysis methods have also been developed to extract the materials mechanical properties from these data (finite element model + cost function, local fitting of the propagation equation, etc). The main difficulty of these extractions consists in dealing with the experimental noise and spatial derivatives required during the processing. The aim of this communication is to provide an insight into the Optimized Virtual Field Method (OVFM, Avril et al. Comput Mech 34:439–452, 2004) abilities to identify mechanical properties while analyzing noisy data. MRE data over harmonically loaded soft materials has been simulated. The effect of noise and spatial sampling has then been studied while identifying locally a viscoelastic model with the OVFM. This noise effect study provided an a priori criterion to estimate the local identification quality. The results also helped to underline and estimate identification biases induced by the noise and spatial subsampling. A viscoelastic model has then been identified over a real experimental data set, providing 3D mechanical parameters maps.


Virtual field method Inverse method Elastography Noise effect 


  1. 1.
    Avril S, Grédiac M, Pierron F (2004) Sensitivity of the virtual fields method to noisy data. Comput Mech 34:439–452MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao L, Parker K, Lerner R, Levinson S (1996) Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue – A review. Ultrasound Med Biol 22(8):959–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ophir J, Alam S, Garra B, Kallel F, Konofagou E, Krouskop T, Varghese T (1999) Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H – J Eng Med 213 (H3):203–233Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bayly P, Ji S, Song S, Okamoto R, Massouros P, Genin G (2004) Measurement of strain in physical models of brain injury: a method based on harp analysis of tagged magnetic resonance images (MRI). J Biomech Eng 126:523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bayly P, Cohen T, Leister E, Ajo D, Leuthardt E, Genin G (2005) Deformation of the human brain induced by mild acceleration. J Neurotrauma 22:84556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayly P, Black E, Pedersen R, Leister E, Genin G (2006) In vivo imaging of rapid deformation and strain in an animal model of traumatic brain injury. J Biomech 39:1086–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmitt J (1998) OCT elastography: imaging microscopic deformation and strain of tissue. Opt Express 3(6):199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oida T, Amano A, Matsuda T (2004) Magnetic resonance elastography: in vivo measurements of elasticity for human tissue. In: Informatics research for development of knowledge society infrastructure, 2004. ICKS 2004, international conference, pp 57–64Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muthupillai R, Lomas D, Rossman P, Greenleaf J, Manduca A, Ehman R (1995) Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 269(5232):1854–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McGee K, Lake D, Mariappan Y, Hubmayr R, Manduca A, Ansell K, Ehman RL (2011) Calculation of shear stiffness in noise dominated magnetic resonance elastography data based on principal frequency estimation. Phys Med Biol 56(14):4291–4309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith J, Ehman R (2000) Extraction of propagating waves in cine images from magnetic resonance elastography. Mater Eval 58(12):1395–1401Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Avril S, Bonnet M, Bretelle AS, Grédiac M, Hild F, Ienny P, Latourte F, Lemosse D, Pagano S, Pagnacco E, Pierron F (2008) Overview of identification methods of mechanical parameters based on full-field measurements. Exp Mech 48(4):381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pierron F, Bayly PV, Namani R (2010) Application of the virtual fields method to magnetic resonance elastography data, Society for Experimental Mechanics. In: SEM annual conference and exposition on experimental and applied mechanics, Indianapolis, 7–10 June 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Connesson
    • 1
  • E. H. Clayton
    • 2
  • P. V. Bayly
    • 2
  • F. Pierron
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratoire Sols-Solides-Structures (3SR)Université de Grenoble (INPG-UJF)Grenoble Cedex 9France
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Mécanique et Procédés de Fabrication (LMPF)Arts et Métiers ParisTechChâlons-en-Champagne cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations