Skip to main content

Efficiency of Credit That Targets the Poor: Measures and Application of Agricultural Credit in Burkina Faso

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wealth through Integration

Part of the book series: Insight and Innovation in International Development ((IIID,volume 4))

  • 787 Accesses

Abstract

Micro-credit has become a frequently used a tool to reduce poverty by targeting the poor through a variety of indicators. The efficiency of this type of micro-credit is not measured in the literature. This study proposes an efficiency index for credit programmes that target the poor, calculated based on the effectiveness of the target indicators. The efficiency index, which is calculated for agricultural credit, measures the percentage of the total envelope that reaches the poor. The results indicate that targeting farming has the potential of enabling agriculture credit to reach at least 89% of the monetarily poor households, with an efficiency index of less than 42%. This eligibility of the poor falls to 13.2% of poor households in 1998 and 22% in 2003 when targeting actual applicants for agricultural loans. Ultimately, agricultural credit reaches fewer than 11% of the monetarily poor households, with an actual efficiency of at most 42%. The large gap between potential and real eligibility indicates the eviction of the poor due to a variety of implicit indicators whose in-depth analysis will allow credit programmes to be better adapted to the target group. Targeting on the basis of other indicators, such as the major grains (e.g. sorghum), small ruminant breeding or the possession of farmland, is effective when it comes to the eligibility of poor households but inefficient in eliminating those who are not poor, which yields an efficiency index of at most 42%, even if the financial administration is effective in transferring the funds to the poor. To reach many more of the poor, agricultural credit still needs to be adapted to the conditions of the poorest, while agrarian reform that would give legal value to land, would offer the poor greater access to credit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Poverty Reduction Strategy Documents (PRSD) of Benin (2002), Burkina Faso (2000 et 2004), Ghana (2003), Cameroon (2003), Guinea (2000), Mali (2002), Niger (2002) and Senegal (2002) provide for the development of financial services and notably micro-finance as a poverty-reduction tool(MEDEV (2004), MEF (2000, 2002), MF (2003), MINEPAT (2003), SP/CNDLP (2002) and SP/SRP (2002)).

  2. 2.

    We can cite the INSD (1996, 2000a, 2000b, 2003) in Burkina Faso, Grootaert and Kanbur (1990), Grootaert (1996) in Côte d’Ivoire, Geda et al. (2001) in Kenya, Datt and Jolliffe (1999) in Egypt and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Documents (PRSD) developed between 2002 and 2006 (cf. see above notes and the references for more details).

  3. 3.

    The efficiency of credit refers to the percentage of the overall expenditure (envelope) that reaches poor households, while the effectiveness measures how much the beneficiaries’ standard of living increases.

  4. 4.

    The PWR index is built in a community meeting. The meeting participants are divided into three to five groups. Each group is responsible for placing the community’s households into wealth and well-being categories. The poor category gets the highest score and the richest the lowest. The households are then ranked based on the average scores obtained by the three to five groups.

  5. 5.

    The PAT is implemented in five steps: (1) carrying out a survey an a sample that includes MFI clients and non-clients who serve as a control, (2) generating a poverty index or score for each household by applying the analysis of the principle components, (3) dividing the control population into quantiles, the first of which corresponds to the poverty index within the population, (4) determining the “threshold scores” that enable a reproduction of the quantiles obtained in step 3 and (5) producing the frequencies of the MFI clients analysed in each class of scores identified in step 4.

  6. 6.

    Agricultural credit is primarily the realm of the Caisse Nationale de Crédit Agricole (CNCA), which was founded in 1980 and became the Banque Agricole et Commerciale du Burkina (BACB) in 2002. The Société des Fibres Textiles (SOFITEX) and the MFI also participate in providing agricultural credit. A farmer’s access to credit is essentially linked to joint backing from the grouping to which he belongs. Generally, villages have at least one grouping that can provide backing.

References

  • Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey (1997), ‘Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research’, European Journal of Operational Research 98: 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counts, A. (2002),‘Grameen Technology Center: Action to Reduce Poverty’, Concept Paper, Grameen Foundation USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datt, G. and D. Jolliffe (1999), ‘Determinants of Poverty in Egypt : 1997’. IFPRI, FCND Discussion Paper No. 75. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957), ‘The measurement of productive efficiency’, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol 120, Part III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geda, A., N. de Jong, G. Mwabu, M.S. Kimenyi (2001), ‘Determinants of Poverty in Kenya: A Household Level Analysis’, Working Paper. Institute of Social Studies (ISS) and Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, C. (1996), ‘The determinants of poverty in Côte d’Ivoire in the 1980s’, Journal of African Economies, Volume 6, Number 2 :169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, C. and R.Kanbur(1990), ‘Analyse Opérationnelle de la Pauvreté et des Dimensions Sociales de l’Ajustement Structurel : Méthodologie et Proposition d’Application au Cas de la Côte d’Ivoire, 1985-88’, Les Dimensions Sociales de l’Ajustement en Afrique Subsaharienne, Document de travail No. 1, Analyse socio-économique. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, Brigit (2006), ‘Access for all: Building inclusive Financial Systems, capturing 10 yearsof CGAP experience’, CGAP, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. And M. Sharma, C. Lapenu and M. Zeller (2003), ‘Microfinance Poverty Assessment Tool’, Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest (CGAP), the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSD (1996), ‘Le Profil de Pauvreté au Burkina Faso’,Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et du Plan; Projet d’Appui Institutionnel aux Dimensions Sociales de l’Ajustement.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSD (2000a), ‘Analyse des Résultats de l’Enquête Prioritaire sur les Conditions de Vie des Ménages en 1998’, Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances; Direction des Statistiques Générales, Étude Statistique Nationale, Première Édition, Ouagadougou, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSD (2000b), ‘Profil et Évolution de la Pauvreté au Burkina Faso’ Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances; Direction des Statistiques Générales, Étude Statistique Nationale, Première Édition, Ouagadougou, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSD (2003), ‘Profil et Évolution de la Pauvreté au Burkina Faso’, Ministère de l’Économie etdes Finances, Direction des Statistiques Générales, Ouagadougou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaboré, T. S. (2009), ‘Effectivité d’un crédit ciblé aux pauvres: le cas des microentreprises rurales du Burkina Faso’,Revue Canadienne d’Études du Développement 29, No. 1–2 : 217–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. and M Ravallion (1995), ‘Poverty and Policy’, in Berhman and T.N. Srinivasan (Eds) Handbook of Development Economics, Volume III, Elsevier Science B.V

    Google Scholar 

  • McKillop, D.G., J.C.Glass, and C. Ferguson (2002), ‘An Examination of the Efficiency of UK Credit Unions’

    Google Scholar 

  • MEDEV (2004), ‘Cadre Stratégique de Lutte contre la Pauvreté, Burkina Faso’, Ministère de l'Economie et du Développement (MEDEV), January 2004. Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEF (2000), ‘Burkina Faso: Cadre Stratégique de Lutte contre la Pauvreté’, Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), Burkina Faso.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEF (2000), ‘Document Intérimaire de Stratégies de Réduction de la Pauvreté (DISRP)’, Republic of Guinea, October 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEF (2002), ‘Mali: Cadre Stratégique de Lutte contre la Pauvreté Final’, Ministry of the Economy and Finance (MEF) Mali. Document prepared and voted by the government of Mali, May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEF (2002), ‘Document de Stratégie de Réduction de la Pauvreté, Sénégal’, Ministry of the economy and Finance (MEF), Republic of Senegal, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. (1996), ‘A Study of Bank Efficiency Taking into Account Risk-preferences’, Journal of Banking & Finance 20:1025–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MF (2003), ‘Poverty Reduction Strategy 2003–2005: an agenda for growth and Prosperity’, Ministry of Finance (MF) Ghana, February 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • MFB (2005),‘Stratégie Nationale de Microfinance: document de politique et cadre logique de mise en œuvre’, Ministry of Finance and Budget (MFB), Burkina Faso, November 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINEPAT (2003), ‘Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PSRP)’, Ministry of Economy, Programming and Development (MINEPAT), Cameroon, April 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, W. (2001), ‘Poverty and Access to Credit in Sri Lanka in the 1990s: A Multilevel Analysis’, Development Studies Association, University of Bradford, Centre for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribe, H., S. Carvalho, R. Liebenthal, P. Nicholas and E. Zuckerman (1990), ‚How Adjustment Programs Can Help the Poor: The World Bank’s Experience’, World Bank Discussion Papers 71. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • SP/CNDLP (2002), ‘Document de Stratégie de Réduction de la Pauvreté au Bénin 2003-2005’, Secrétariat Permanent, Commission Nationale de Développement et de la Lutte contre la Pauvreté (SP/CNDLP), December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • SP/SRP (2002), ‘Document de Stratégie de Réduction de la Pauvreté, Niger’, Prepared by the government of Niger, Secrétariat Permanent de la Stratégie de Réduction de la Pauvreté (SP/SRP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanowitz, A. B. Nkuna, S. Kasim, and R.Gailey (2000), ‘Overcoming the obstacles of identifying the poorest families: using participatory Wealth Ranking (PWR), the CASHPOR Housing Index (CHI) and other measurements to identify and encourage the participation of the poorest families, specially the women of those families’, Microcredit Summit, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, H. (1998), ‘Women Climbing out of Poverty Through Credit or What do Cows Have to do With It?’, Livestock Research for Rural Development; Volume 10, Number 3, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, H. (2002), ‘Assessing the Poverty and Vulnerability Impact of Micro-Credit in Bangladesh: A Case Study of BRAC’, The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Tambi Kaboré .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

Table 10.A.1 Percentage (%) of poor and non-poor households based on a few targeting indicators
Table 10.A.2 Efficiency indices for credit targeted based on major activities of poor households
Table 10.A.3 Efficiency indices for credit targeted based on sustainable assets and goods held by poor households

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 International Development Research Centre

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaboré, S.T. (2012). Efficiency of Credit That Targets the Poor: Measures and Application of Agricultural Credit in Burkina Faso. In: Ayuk, E., Kaboré, S. (eds) Wealth through Integration. Insight and Innovation in International Development, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4415-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics