Abstract
The assessment of risk (including both violent and sexual), recidivism, and dangerousness in adults most frequently involves predicting the probability of either an initial offense or a subsequent offense (typically criminal reoffending), either sexual or otherwise (e.g., violence and other criminal behavior). This type of assessment is extraordinarily complicated, and while certain socioeconomic variables (e.g., gender) have been studied extensively with regard to risk prediction and recidivism, such extensive research has not been conducted on ethnic differences. In this chapter, we review measures that assess violence risk and recidivism, we discuss measures commonly used with sexual offenders, we review relevant research conducted with Hispanics, and we provide some guidelines for conducting such assessments with Hispanics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Please see the chapter by Alamilla and Wojik on assessing for personality disorders for a more detailed review of these measures and relevant cultural considerations.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The LSI-R: Level of service inventory–revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The LSI-R: Level of service inventory–revised: U.S. norms manual supplement. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Arbach-Lucioni, K., Andres-Pueyo, A., Pomarol-Clotet, E., & Gomar-Sones, J. (2011). Predicting violence in psychiatric inpatients: A prospective study with the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22(2), 203–222.
Barber-Rioja, V., Dewey, L., Kopelovich, S., & Kucharski, L. (2012). The utility of the HCR-20 and PCL:SV in the prediction of diversion noncompliance and reincarceration in diversion programs. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 39(4), 475–492.
Borum, R. (1996). Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training. American Psychologist, 51(9), 945–956.
Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Manual for the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Consultation version. Tampa: Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
Campbell, M., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567–590.
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243(4899), 1668–1674.
Dinges, N. G., Atlis, M. M., & Vincent, G. M. (1997). Cross-cultural perspectives on antisocial behavior. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, J. D. Maser, D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 463–473). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., & Douglas, K. S. (2006). Incremental validity analyses of the violence risk appraisal guide and the psychopathy checklist: Screening version in a civil psychiatric sample. Assessment, 13(3), 368–374.
Elbogen, E. B. (2002). The process of violence risk assessment: A review of descriptive research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(6), 591–604.
First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders, (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
Garcia-Mansilla, A., Rosenfeld, B., & Cruise, K. R. (2011). Violence risk assessment and women: Predictive accuracy of the HCR-20 in a civil psychiatric sample. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 29(5), 623–633.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C. E., & Law, M. A. (1997). Predicting prison misconducts. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 24(4), 414–431.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the ‘unparalleled’ measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 29(4), 397–426.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology, 34(4), 575–607.
Greenfield, L. A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sex (pp. 15–24). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Grilo, C. M., Anez, L. M., & McGlashan, T. H. (2003). The Spanish-Language version of the diagnostic interview for DSM-IV personality disorders: Development and initial psychometric evaluation of diagnoses and criteria. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Medicine.
Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report 1997–04). Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6–35.
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 99–02). Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
Hare, R. D., Clark, D., Grann, M., & Thornton, D. (2000). Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: An international perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 623–645.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315–335.
Hastings, M. E., Krishnan, S., Tangney, J. P., & Stuewig, J. (2011). Predictive and incremental validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide scores with male and female jail inmates. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 174–183.
Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (2006). Level of Service–Revised profile of English prisoners: Risk and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 347–366.
Holt, R. R. (1958). Clinical and statistical prediction: A reformulation and some new data. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 1–12.
Kilgust, A. R. (2009). Sentencing and risk characteristics of Latino sexual offenders. School of Professional Psychology (Paper 96). Retrieved From http://commons.pacificu.edu/spp/96
Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471–489.
Kröner, C., Stadtland, C., Eidt, M., & Nedopil, N. (2007). The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17(2), 89–100.
Langan, P. A., Schmitt, E. L., & Durose, M. R. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Litwack, T. R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(2), 409–443.
Martinez, R., Flores, J., & Rosenfeld, B. (2007). Validity of the juvenile sex offender assessment protocol-II in a sample of urban minority youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(10), 1284–1295.
McGowan, M. R., Horn, R. A., & Mellott, R. N. (2011). The predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth in secondary educational settings. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 478–486.
McGrath, R. J. (1992). Five critical questions: Assessing sex offender risk. Perspectives, 16(3), 6–9.
McGrath, R. J., & Hoke, S. E. (2001). Vermont assessment of sex offender risk manual. Middlebury, VT: Author.
McGrath, R. J., Hoke, S. E., Livingston, J. A., & Cumming, G. (2001, November). The Vermont Assessment of Sex Offender Risk (VASOR): An initial reliability and validity study. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.
Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Monahan, J. (2002). The MacArthur studies of violence risk. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 12S, 67.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P., Banks, S., Grisso, T., et al. (2005). An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56, 810–815.
Packard, R., & Gordon, A. (1999). An investigation of actuarial risk scales: Concordance and factor analysis. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Lake Buena Vista, FL.
Palmer, E. J., & Hollin, C. R. (2007). The level of service inventory-revised with English women prisoners: A needs and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 971–984.
Prentky, R., & Righthand, S. (2003). Youth Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAPII): Manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Psychopathy and violence: The importance of factor level interactions.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cromier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Roth, E. (2006). Assessment of violence risk and psychopathy in a population of incarcerated, adolescent, Hispanic males. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Schlager, M. (2005). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) on a community correction sample: Implications for corrections and parole policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, Newark.
Schlager, M. D., & Simourd, D. J. (2007). Validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) among African American and Hispanic male offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(4), 545–554.
Steadman, H. J., Mulvey, E. P., Monahan, J., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P. S., Grisso, T., et al. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(5), 393–401.
Sullivan, E. A., Abramowitz, C. S., Lopez, M., & Kosson, D. S. (2006). Reliability and construct validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised for Latino, European American, and African American male inmates. Psychological Assessment, 18(4), 382–392.
Tubb, V. A. (2001). The factor structure and psychometric proper- ties of Psychopathy Checklist Revised: Data from an Hispanic Federal inmate population. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 5426.
Viljoen, J. L., Elkovitch, N., Scalora, M. J., & Ulman, D. (2009). Assessment of reoffense risk in adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: Predictive validity of the ERASOR, PCL:YV, YLS/CMI, and Static-99. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(10), 981–1000.
Vincent, G. M., Chapman, J., & Cook, N. E. (2011). Risk-needs assessment in juvenile justice: Predictive validity of the SAVRY, racial differences, and the contribution of needs factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(1), 42–62.
Walsh, Z., & Kosson, D. S. (2008). Psychopathy and violence: The importance of factor level interactions. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 114–120.
Walters, G. D. (2006). Risk-Appraisal Versus Self-Report in the Prediction of Criminal Justice Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 33(3), 279–304.
Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
Windle, M., & Dumenci, L. (1999). The factorial structure and construct validity of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL—R) among alcoholic inpatients. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(4), 372–393.
Worling, J. R. (2004). The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary psychometric data. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 16(3), 235–254.
Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. (2001). Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR; Version 2.0). In M. C. Calder (Ed.), Juveniles and children who sexually abuse: Frameworks for assessment (pp. 372–397). Lyme Regis, UK: Russell Russell House Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cirlugea, O., Benuto, L.T., Leany, B.D. (2013). Assessing Risk, Recidivism, and Dangerousness in Hispanics. In: Benuto, L. (eds) Guide to Psychological Assessment with Hispanics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4412-1_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4412-1_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4411-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4412-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)