Assessment of Dementia in the Hispanic Client: A Neuropsychological Perspective



With an astounding 62.9 % of Hispanics aged 85 and older exhibiting dementia-related symptoms and a substantial portion of Hispanics speaking Spanish only, the need for psychometrically sound measures designed to assess for cognitive impairment in this cohort is essential. This chapter offers a critical evaluation of the current assessment practices employed to assess for dementia in the Hispanic client. Assessment measures and batteries specifically designed to assess for dementia are reviewed, and research on these measures and batteries with Hispanics is discussed. Finally, guidelines for assessing cognitive impairment with this group are provided.


Language Proficiency Neuropsychological Assessment Assessment Measure Spanish Speaker Visuospatial Ability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alzheimer’s Association. (2011). 2011 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figure. Retrieved from
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: APA.
  3. American Psychological Association. (2011). Guidelines for the evaluation of dementia and age-related cognitive change. Retrieved from
  4. Ardila, A., Rodríguez-Menéndez, G., & Rosselli, M. (2002). Current issues in neuropsychological assessment with Hispanics/Latinos. In R. Ferrao (Ed.), Minority and cross-cultural aspects of neuropsychological assessment (pp. 151–180). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, B. R., Cuellar, I., & Guzman, N. (1998). Statistical and clinical evaluation of the Mattis dementia rating scale-Spanish adaptation: An initial investigation. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science, 53(6), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boone, K., Victor, T. L., Wen, J., Razani, J., & Pontón, M. (2007). The association between neuropsychological scores and ethnicity, language, and acculturation variables in a large patient population. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 355–365. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borson, S., Scanlan, J., Brush, M., Vitaliano, P., & Dokmak, A. (2000). The mini-cog: A cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15(11), 1021–1027. doi:10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<1021::AID-GPS234>3.0.CO;2-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borson, S., Scanlan, J. M., Watanabe, J., Tu, S., & Lessig, M. (2005). Simplifying detection of cognitive impairment: Comparison of the mini-cog and mini-mental state examination in a multiethnic sample. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(5), 871–874. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53269.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrión-Baralt, J. R., Meléndez-Cabrero, J., Beeri, M. S., Sano, M., & Silverman, J. M. (2009). The neuropsychological performances of nondemented Puerto Rican nonagenarians. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 27, 353–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrión-Baralt, J. R., Schnaider-Beeri, M., Melendez-Cabrero, J., Rodriguez-Ubinas, H., Sano, M., & Silverman, J. M. (2008). P3-285: Impact of APOE e4 on very late life cognition. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 4(4), T606.Google Scholar
  11. Census Bureau, U. S. (2002). Hispanic population in the United States: March 2002. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  12. Cherner, M. M., Suarez, P. P., Lazzaretto, D. D., Fortuny, L., Mindt, M., & Dawes, S. S. (2007). Demographically corrected norms for the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised in monolingual Spanish speakers from the U.S.-Mexico border region. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 343–353. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coffey, D. M., Marmol, L., Schock, L., & Adams, W. (2005). The influence of acculturation on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test by Mexican Americans. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(6), 795–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cognistat. (n.d. a). Pioneers in brain fitness cognistat cognitive assessment: About the exam. Retrieved from
  15. Cognistat. (n.d. b). Pioneers in brain fitness cognistat cognitive assessment: Languages & translations & international distributors. Retrieved from
  16. Conners, C., Epstein, J. N., Angold, A., & Klaric, J. (2003). Continuous performance test performance in a normative epidemiological sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology: An Official Publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 31(5), 555–562. doi: 10.1023/A:1025457300409.Google Scholar
  17. Crisostomo, P. R., Butler, K. A., Webster, J. R., & Moran, M. B. (2002). Prevalence of cognitive impairment in an urban Hispanic community population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(5), 977–978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dick, M. B., Teng, E. L., Kempler, D., Davis, D. S., & Taussig, I. (2002). The cross-cultural neuropsychological test battery (CCNB): Effects of age, education, ethnicity, and cognitive status on performance. In F. Ferraro & F. Ferraro (Eds.), Minority and cross-cultural aspects of neuropsychological assessment (pp. 17–41). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Drane, D. L., & Osato, S. S. (1997). Using the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination as a screening measure for older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 139–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Drane, D. L., Yuspeh, R. L., Huthwaite, J. S., Klingler, L. K., Foster, L. M., Mrazik, M., et al. (2003). Healthy older adult performance on modified version of the Cognistat (NCSE): Demographic issues and preliminary normative data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(1), 133–144. doi: 10.1076/jcen. Scholar
  21. Fillenbaum, G. G., Kuchibhalta, M., Henderson, V. W., Clark, C. M., & Taussig, I. M. (2007). Comparison of performance on the CERAD neuropsychological battery of Hispanic patients and cognitively normal controls at two sites. Clinical Gerontologist, 30(3), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fillenbaum, G. G., van Belle, G., Morris, J. C., Mohs, R. C., Mirra, S. S., Davis, P. C., et al. (2008). Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD): The first twenty years. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 4(2), 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gasquoine, P., Croyle, K. L., Cavazos-Gonzalez, C., & Sandoval, O. (2007). Language of administration and neuropsychological test performance in neurologically intact Hispanic American bilingual adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(8), 991–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonzalez, H. M., Mungas, D., & Haan, M. N. (2002). A Verbal Learning and Memory Test for English- and Spanish-speaking older Mexican-American adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(4), 439–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Toronto, Canada: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). MMSS: Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, J. G., Cullum, C. M., & Puente, A. E. (1995). Effects of bilingualism on verbal learning and memory in Hispanic adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 10–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hernandez et al. (2006),à the in-text citation needs to be changed to Lyness, Hernandez, Chui, & Teng, 2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heaton, R. K., et al. (2004). Revised Comprehensive Norms For An Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuropsychological Norms For African Americans and Caucasian Adults. Lutz, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources, IncPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hohl, U., Grundman, M., Salmon, D. P., Thomas, R. G., & Thal, L. J. (1999). Mini-mental state examination and Mattis dementia rating scale performance differs in Hispanic and non-Hispanic Alzheimer’s disease patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5(4), 301–307. doi: 10.1017/S1355617799544019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacobs, D. M., Sano, M., Albert, S., Schofield, P., Dooneief, G., & Stern, Y. (1997). Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment: A comparison of randomly selected, demographically matched cohorts of English- and Spanish-speaking older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 331–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, R.N. & Gallo, J.J. (2002). Education and sex differences in the Mini-Mental State Examination: Effects of Differential Item Functioning. Journal of Gerontology, 57B, 548–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan et al. (1978) should be Kaplan, Goodglass, and Weintraub (1983) and the reference for that is: Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krueger, K. R., Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., & Aggarwal, N. T. (2009). A battery of tests for assessing cognitive function in older Latino persons. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 23(4), 384–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. La Rue, A., Romero, L. J., Ortiz, I. E., Liang, H., & Lindeman, R. D. (1999). Neuropsychological performance of Hispanic and non-Hispanic older adults: An epidemiologic survey. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 474–486. doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lyness, S. A., Hernandez, I., Chui, H. C., & Teng, E. L. (2006). Performance of Spanish speakers on the Mattis dementia rating scale (MDRS). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 827–836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahurin, R. K., Espino, D. V., & Holifield, E. B. (1992). Mental status testing in elderly Hispanic populations: Special concerns. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 28(4), 391–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshall, S.C., Mungas, D., Weldon M. et al. Differential item functioning in the Mini-Mental State Examination in English-and Spanish-speaking older adults. Psychology Aging, 12, 718–725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Marquez de la Plata, C., Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., Alegret, M., Moreno, A., Tárraga, L., Lara, M., et al. (2009). Item analysis of three Spanish naming tests: A cross-cultural investigation. NeuroRehabilitation, 24, 75–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Menon, C., Hall, J., Hobson, V., Johnson, L., & O’Bryant, S. E. (2011). Normative performance on the executive clock drawing task in a multi-ethnic bilingual cohort: A project FRONTIER study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. doi: 10.1002/gps.2810.
  43. Mungas, D. (2006). Neuropsychological assessment of Hispanics elders: Challenges and psychometric approaches. In G. Yeo & D. Gallagher-Thompson (Eds.), Ethnicity and the dementias (2nd ed., pp. 71–86). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  44. Mungas, D., Marshal, S. C., Weldon, M., Haan, M., & Reed, B. R. (1996). Age and education correction of mini-mental state examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly. Neurology, 46(3), 700–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mungas, D., Reed, B. R., Crane, P. K., Haan, M. N., & González, H. (2004). Spanish and English neuropsychological assessment scales (SENAS): Further development and psychometric characteristics. Psychological Assessment, 16(4), 347–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mungas, D., Reed, B. R., Farias, S. T., & DeCarli, C. (2005). Criterion-referenced validity of a neuropsychological test battery: Equivalent performance in elderly Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 620–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mungas, D., Reed, B. R., Haan, M. N., & González, H. (2005). Spanish and English neuropsychological assessment scales: Relationship to demographics, language, cognition, and independent function. Neuropsychology, 19(4), 466–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mungas, D., Reed, B. R., Marshall, S. C., & Gonzalez, H. C. (2000). Development of psychometrically matched English and Spanish language neuropsychological tests for older persons. Neuropsychology, 14(2), 209–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mungas, D., Widaman, K. F., Reed, B. R., & Farias, S. T. (2011). Measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in diverse older persons. Neuropsychology, 25(2), 260–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nasreddine, Z. S., Philips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. (2005). The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oehlert, M., Hass, S. D., Freeman, M. R., Williams, M. D., Ryan, J. J., & Sumerall, S. W. (1997). The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination: Accuracy of the “screen-metric” approach in a clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 733–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peña-Casanova, J., Blesa, R., Aguilar, M., Gramunt-Fombuena, N., Gómez-Ansón, B., Oliva, R., et al. (2009). Spanish multicenter normative studies (NEURONORMA project): Methods and sample characteristics. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(4), 307–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramírez, M., Teresi, J. A., Holmes, D., Gurland, B., & Lantigua, R. (2006). Differential item functioning (DIF) and the mini-mental state examination (MMSE): Overview, sample, and issues of translation. Medical Care, 44(11), S95–S106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ramírez, M., Teresi, J. A., Silver, S., Holmes, D., Gurland, B., & Lantigua, R. (2001). Cognitive assessment among minority elderly: Possible test bias. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 7(1), 91–118.Google Scholar
  55. Rey, G. J., Feldman, E., Rivas-Vazquez, R., Levin, B. E., & Bentin, A. (1999). Neuropsychological development and normative data on Hispanics. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 593–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Roper, B. L., Bieliauskas, L. A., & Peterson, M. R. (1996). Validity of the mini-mental state examination and the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination in cognitive screening. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 9(1), 54–57.Google Scholar
  57. Rosen, W.G., Mohs, R.C., & Davis, K.L. (1984). A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s diseases. American Journal of Psychiatry, 14, 1356–1364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rossetti, H. C., Lacritz, L. H., Cullum, M., & Weiner, M. F. (2011). Normative date of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in a population based sample. Neurology, 77(13), 1272–1275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Royall, D. R., Espino, D. V., Polk, M. J., Verdeja, R., Vale, S., Gonzales, H., et al. (2003). Validation of a Spanish translation of the CLOX for use in Hispanic samples: The Hispanic EPESE study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(2), 135–140. doi: 10.1002/gps.804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strutt, A. & Scott, B. (2011). Misclassification of Cognitive Impairment on the MOCA with Spanish-Speaking Older Adults. Retrieved from:
  61. Taussig, M., Henderson, V. W., & Mack, W. (1992). Spanish translation and validation of a neuropsychological battery: Performance of Spanish- and English-speaking Alzheimer’s disease patients and normal comparison subjects. Clinical Gerontologist, 11(3–4), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Teresi, J., Golden, R., Cross, P. et al. (1995). Item bias in cognitive screening measures: Comparison of elderly White, Afro-Americans, Hispanic, and high and low education subgroups. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Teresi, J. A., Holmes, D., Ramirez, M., Gurland, B. J., & Lantigua, R. (2001). Performance of cognitive tests among different racial/ethnic and education groups: Findings of differential item functioning and possible item bias. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 7(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
  64. Thombaben, M. (2010). A simple tool to screen clients for cognitive impairment. Home Health Care Management Practice, 22, 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992). The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(9), 922–935.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Valle, R., Hough, R., Kolody, B., Cook-Gait, H., Figueroa, G., Jimenez, R., & Atkinson, J.H. (1991). The validation of the Blessed Mental Status Test and the Mini-Mental Status Examination with an Hispanic population. In Final report to the National Institute of Mental Health, Grunt #ROI MH43390-01.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Weintraub, S. (2011). Neuropsychology of aging and dementia. Retrieved from
  68. Wheeler, D. K. (2010). Digit span with a linguistically diverse Latina/Latino population: A cross-language study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Fielding Graduate University. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Victims of Crime Treatment CenterUniversity of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA
  2. 2.California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Adult DivisionCalifornia Correctional Health Care ServicesSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations