Field Transformation Approach to Designing Lenses

  • Sidharath Jain
  • Raj Mittra


This chapter presents a technique--referred to herein as the Field Transformation method--for designing flat lenses, as well as flat-base Luneburg lens antennas for wide-angle scanning using waveguide array feeds. The performance characteristics of these lenses are compared with those based on Transformation Optics (TO) paradigm, which has been recently developed as a tool for designing lenses of the same type. It is shown, via several examples, that the Field Transformation approach leads to designs which use conventional materials that are conveniently realizable, as opposed to metamaterials or those with anisotropic properties, that are often called for and are difficult to realize in TO-based designs. Furthermore, the Field Transformation approach enables one to control both the phase and amplitude distributions in the aperture of an antenna, which is difficult to do when employing the geometry transformation approach prescribed in the TO paradigm.


Wide Frequency Band Waveguide Array Electrical Length Transformation Optic Broad Frequency Band 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Leonhardt U (2006) Optical conformal mapping. Science 312(5781):1777–1780MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pendry JB, Schurig D, Smith DR (2006) Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312(5781):1780–1782MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen L, Pendry JB (2008) Hiding under the carpet: a new strategy for cloaking. Phys Rev Lett 101(20):203901–203904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luneburg RK (1964) Mathematical theory of optics. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles, pp 182–193Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jain S, Abdel-Mageed M, Mittra R(2013) Design of flat lenses using field manipulation. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APS), Orlando, (to appear)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang R, Tang W, Hao Y (2011) A broadband zone plate lens from transformation optics. Opt Express 19(13):12348–12355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith DR, Schultz S, Marko P, Soukoulis CM (2002) Determination of effective permittivity and permeability of metamaterials from reflection and transmission coefficients. Phys Rev B 65:195104–195108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma HF, Cui TJ (2010) Three-dimensional broadband and broad-angle transformation-optics lens. Nat Commun 1(8):124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tom D, Guy L, Jack H, Nathan L, Nathan K, Basov Dimitri N, Smith DR (2012) Performance of a three-dimensional transformation-optical-flattened Luneburg lens. Opt Express 20(12):13264–13273Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kundtz N, Smith DR (2010) Extreme-angle broadband metamaterial lens. Nat Mater 9(2): 129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jain S, Mittra R (2013) Broadband flat-base Luneburg lens antenna for wide angle scan. Metamaterials, Bordeaux, France. (to appear)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith DR, Urzhumov Y, Kundtz NB, Landy NI (2010) Enhancing imaging systems using transformation optics. Opt Express 18(20):21238–21251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EMC Lab, Department of Electrical EngineeringPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations