Advertisement

Biophysical Techniques for Protein Size Distribution Analysis

Chapter
Part of the Biophysics for the Life Sciences book series (BIOPHYS, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the biophysical methods for size distribution analysis of biopharmaceutical protein products. Protein aggregates, conformational variants, reversible self-association, fragments, and glycosylation are common contributors to size heterogeneity in protein pharmaceuticals. Size distribution analysis is essential to product understanding and for ensuring product quality during development. The choice of specific techniques for determination of size heterogeneity may not be straightforward due to a broad range of possible sizes from protein fragments to visible particles. We discuss commonly used biophysical methods for the determination of protein size distribution including size-exclusion chromatography, field-flow fractionation, sedimentation, light scattering, microscopy, light obscuration, electrical zone sensing, and mass spectrometry. The advantages and limitations of each method are also presented. A combination of several methods is often necessary to obtain a comprehensive view of size heterogeneity.

Keywords

Hydrodynamic Size Semipermeable Membrane Size Distribution Analysis Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Size Heterogeneity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Attri AK, Minton AP (2005) Composition gradient static light scattering: a new technique for rapid detection and quantitative characterization of reversible macromolecular hetero-­associations in solution. Anal Biochem 346:132–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahr U, Rohling U, Lautz C, Strupat K, Schurenberg M, Hillenkamp F (1996) A charge detector for time-of-flight mass analysis of high mass ions produced by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI). J Mass Spectrom Ion Process 153:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banyay M, Gilstring F, Hauzenberger E, Ofverstedt LG, Eriksson AB, Krupp JJ, Larsson O (2004) Three-dimensional imaging of in situ specimens with low-dose electron tomography to analyze protein conformation. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2:561–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber TA, Lannis MD, Williams JG (1989) Method evaluation: automated microscopy as a compendial test for particulates in parenteral solutions. J Parenter Sci Technol 43:27–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bich C, Zenobi R (2009) Mass spectrometry of large complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19:632–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burg TP, Godin M, Knudsen SM, Shen W, Carlson G, Foster JS, Babcock K, Manalis SR (2007) Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles in fluid. Nature 446:1066–1069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao S, Pollastrini J, Jiang Y (2009a) Separation and characterization of protein aggregates and particles by field flow fractionation. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10:382–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao S, Jiao N, Jiang Y, Mire-Sluis A, Narhi LO (2009b) Sub-visible particle quantitation in protein therapeutics. Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes 2009:73–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cromwell ME, Hilario E, Jacobson F (2006a) Protein aggregation and bioprocessing. AAPS J 8:E572–E579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cromwell MEM, Felten C, Flores H, Liu J, Shire SJ (2006b) Self-association of therapeutic proteins: implications for product development. In: Murphy RM, Tsai AM (eds) Misbehaving proteins: protein (Mis)folding, aggregation, and stability. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Engel A, Muller DJ (2000) Observing single biomolecules at work with the atomic force microscope. Nat Struct Biol 7:715–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fechner P, Boudier T, Mangenot S, Jaroslawski S, Sturgis JN, Scheuring S (2009) Structural information, resolution, and noise in high-resolution atomic force microscopy topographs. Biophys J 96:3822–3831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filipe V, Hawe A, Jiskoot W (2010) Critical evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates. Pharm Res 27:796–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Follmer C, Pereira FV, Da Silveira NP, Carlini CR (2004) Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5) aggregation monitored by dynamic and static light scattering. Biophys Chem 111:79–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujishita O, Sendo T, Hisazumi A, Otsubo K, Aoyama T, Oishi R (1995) The evaluation of sizing accuracy of particle counters for parenteral drugs. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 49:267–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabrielson JP, Brader ML, Pekar AH, Mathis KB, Winter G, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW (2007a) Quantitation of aggregate levels in a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody formulation by size-exclusion chromatography, asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation, and sedimentation velocity. J Pharm Sci 96:268–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabrielson JP, Randolph TW, Kendrick BS, Stoner MR (2007b) Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation and SEDFIT/c(s): limits of quantitation for a monoclonal antibody system. Anal Biochem 361:24–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang CT, Sharma D, Oma P, Krishnamurthy R (2009) Quantitation of protein particles in parenteral solutions using micro-flow imaging. J Pharm Sci 98:3058–3071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jossang T, Feder J, Rosenqvist E (1988) Photon correlation spectroscopy of human IgG. J Protein Chem 7:165–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krutchinsky AN, Ayed A, Donald LJ, Ens W, Duckworth HW, Standing KG (2000) Studies of noncovalent complexes in an electrospray ionization/time-of-flight mass spectrometer. In: Chapman J (ed) Mass spectrometry of proteins and peptides. Humana Press, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  21. Kukrer B, Filipe V, Duijn EV, Kasper PT, Vreeken RJ, Heck AJR, Jiskoot W (2010) Mass spectrometric analysis of intact human monoclonal antibody aggregates fractionated by size-­exclusion chromatography. Pharm Res 27:2197–2204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee H, Kirchmeier M, Mach H (2011) Monoclonal antibody aggregation intermediates visualized by atomic force microscopy. J Pharm Sci 100:416–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Litzen A, Walter JK, Krischollek H, Wahlund KG (1993) Separation and quantitation of monoclonal antibody aggregates by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation and comparison to gel permeation chromatography. Anal Biochem 212:469–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Andya JD, Shire SJ (2006) A critical review of analytical ultracentrifugation and field flow fractionation methods for measuring protein aggregation. AAPS J 8:E580–E589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu H, Gaza-Bulseco G, Lundell E (2008) Assessment of antibody fragmentation by reversed-­phase liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 876:13–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahler HC, Friess W, Grauschopf U, Kiese S (2009) Protein aggregation: pathways, induction factors and analysis. J Pharm Sci 98:2909–2934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manta B, Obal G, Ricciardi A, Pritsch O, Denicola A (2011) Tools to evaluate the conformation of protein products. Biotechnol J 6:731–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore JM, Patapoff TW, Cromwell ME (1999) Kinetics and thermodynamics of dimer formation and dissociation for a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor. Biochemistry 38:13960–13967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narhi LO, Jiang Y, Cao S, Benedek K, Shnek D (2009) A critical review of analytical methods for subvisible and visible particles. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10:373–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. North SJ, Hitchen PG, Haslam SM, Dell A (2009) Mass spectrometry in the analysis of N-linked and O-linked glycans. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19:498–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliva A, Llabres M, Farina JB (2004) Applications of multi-angle laser light-scattering detection in the analysis of peptides and proteins. Curr Drug Discov Technol 1:229–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pease LF 3rd, Elliott JT, Tsai DH, Zachariah MR, Tarlov MJ (2008) Determination of protein aggregation with differential mobility analysis: application to IgG antibody. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:1214–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Philo JS (2006) Is any measurement method optimal for all aggregate sizes and types? AAPS J 8:E564–E571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Philo JS (2009) A critical review of methods for size characterization of non-particulate protein aggregates. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10:359–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rambaldi DC, Reschiglian P, Zattoni A (2011) Flow field-flow fractionation: recent trends in protein analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 399:1439–1447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rivas G, Stafford W, Minton AP (1999) Characterization of heterologous protein-protein interactions using analytical ultracentrifugation. Methods 19:194–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roux KH (1999) Immunoglobulin structure and function as revealed by electron microscopy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 120:85–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sandin S, Öfverstedt L-G, Wikström A-C, Wrange Ö, Skoglund U (2004) Structure and flexibility of individual immunoglobulin G molecules in solution. Structure 12:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharma DK, King D, Moore PD, Oma P, Thomas D (2007) Flow microscopy for particulate analysis in parenteral and pharmaceutical fluids. Eur J Parenter Pharm Sci 12:97–101Google Scholar
  40. Tatford OC, Gomme PT, Bertolini J (2004) Analytical techniques for the evaluation of liquid protein therapeutics. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 40:67–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomson NH (2005) Imaging the substructure of antibodies with tapping-mode AFM in air: the importance of a water layer on mica. J Microsc 217:193–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vendruscolo M (2007) Determination of conformationally heterogeneous states of proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:15–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang YJ, Shahrokh Z, Vemuri S, Eberlein G, Beylin I, Busch M (1996) Characterization, stability, and formulations of basic fibroblast growth factor. Pharm Biotechnol 9:141–180Google Scholar
  44. Wang G, Johnson AJ, Kaltashov IA (2011) Evaluation of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry as a tool for characterization of small soluble protein aggregates. Anal Chem 84:1718–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Washabaugh MW, Collins KD (1986) The systematic characterization by aqueous column chromatography of solutes which affect protein stability. J Biol Chem 261:12477–12485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wen J, Arakawa T, Philo JS (1996) Size-exclusion chromatography with on-line light-scattering, absorbance, and refractive index detectors for studying proteins and their interactions. Anal Biochem 240:155–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wenzel RJ, Matter U, Schutheis L, Zenobi R (2005) Analysis of megadalton ions using cryodetection MALDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 77:4329–4337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu G, Hummel D, Herman A (1997) Analysis of the solution behavior of protein pharmaceuticals by laser light scattering photometry. ACS Symp Ser 675:168–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wuchner K, Buchler J, Spycher R, Dalmonte P, Volkin DB (2010) Development of a microflow digital imaging assay to characterize protein particulates during storage of a high concentration IgG1 monoclonal antibody formulation. J Pharm Sci 99:3343–3361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yohannes G, Jussila M, Hartonen K, Riekkola ML (2011) Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation technique for separation and characterization of biopolymers and bioparticles. J Chromatogr A 1218:4104–4116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Analytical Development, NovavaxRockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Biopharmaceutical Development, MedimmuneGaithersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations