Skip to main content

The Gang as a Network

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defining Street Gangs in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSCRIMINOL,volume 1))

  • 711 Accesses

Abstract

Social networks represent an empirically grounded model of social structure that grew out of an increasing awareness that spatial boundaries do not delimit social boundaries. The approach taken in this text will focus on the network as a process for the mobilization of action, rather than on the quantification of network characteristics; the latter representing a sociometric path that has emerged since the origins of network analysis in ethnography. Unlike the long-standing occidental gang paradigm, new-age street gangs are not geographically anchored to an area, rather, they are most often characterized by their extraordinary mobility and fluidity of gang composition. The mobility which characterizes their activities has tended to produce loose-knit networks which show little redundancy or overlap in connectedness among the network links.

Everything went through him [leader]. He controlled ‘x’ many people who only knew ‘x’ many people, whereas he [leader] was the key because he knows the whole thing [network]

Interview with a former gang player who is referencing the street gang leader he followed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The characteristics being referenced would be consistent with what Klein et al. (2006) have termed gang “definers”.

References

  • Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture, 12(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. A. (1972). Social networks. Addison-Wesley module in anthropology 26. Phillipines: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissevain, J. (1971). Second thoughts on quasi-groups, categories and coalitions. Man, 6, 468–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bott, E. (1955). Urban families: Conjugal roles and social networks. Human Relations, 8(4), 345–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1993). Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In R. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Intelligence Service Canada. (2005). 2005 Annual report on organized crime in Canada. Ottawa: Director General, CISC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, M. (1934). Sociology. London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, M. (1967). Introduction. In A. L. Epstein (Ed.), The craft of social anthropology. London: Social Science Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. M. (2000). Criminal business organization, street gangs and ‘Wanna-Be’ groups: A vancouver perspective. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. C. (1990). Kinship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M., Weerman, F., & Thornberry, T. (2006). Street gang violence in Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A. C. (1978). The significance of quasi-groups in the study of complex societies. In M. Banton (Ed.), The social anthropology of complex societies. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, C. E. (1993). A network analysis of Vietnamese criminal organizations. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. University of Calgary, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Velzen, H. U. E. (1971). Coalitions and network analysis. In J. Boissevain & J. C. Mitchell (Eds.), Network analysis studies in human interaction. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigil, J. D., & Yun, S. C. (1990). Vietnamese youth gangs in southern California. In R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1983). Network analysis: Some basic principles. In R. Collins (Ed.), Sociological theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. Prowse .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prowse, C.E. (2012). The Gang as a Network. In: Defining Street Gangs in the 21st Century. SpringerBriefs in Criminology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4307-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics