Skip to main content

Conventional Biopsy Techniques

Abstract

The term “conventional biopsy techniques” implies all those traditional sampling techniques that can be used without adopting the latest technology. Even if the diagnostic possibilities and sensitivity of bronchoscopy have greatly increased by the recent advent of new technological tools, the use of conventional biopsy techniques remains relevantly unchanged and allows the pulmonologist to successfully approach a high percentage of endobronchial, pulmonary and mediastinal lesions for diagnostic purposes.

In this chapter, conventional biopsy techniques will be divided on the basis of the location of the lesion, analysing methods used for sampling central endobronchial lesions (i.e. lesions located within the visible range of flexible bronchoscope), peripheral pulmonary lesions or lung parenchyma and the pathological processes of the hilar-mediastinal area.

Table 15.1 Conventional bronchoscopic sampling instruments used for lesions of the central airways, for peripheral pulmonary lesions and for pathological processes of the hilar-mediastinal area

Indications, technique, possibilities and limits of each sampling method (forceps biopsy, brushing, bronchial washing, transbronchial needle aspiration) and of its association are reported.

Whenever a biopsy technique is employed, its use must always be guided by a global clinical assessment of the patient, evaluating the risk/advantage ratio and the benefits that can be obtained by the procedure case by case.

Only by integrating clinical, imaging and bronchoscopic techniques will it be possible to optimise bronchoscopy, thereby obtaining the best diagnostic accuracy, minimising the costs involved and having the lowest incidence of risks.

Keywords

  • Diagnostic Yield
  • Forceps Biopsy
  • Flexible Bronchoscope
  • Mediastinal Lesion
  • Diffuse Lung Disease

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4292-9_15
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4614-4292-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 15.1
Fig. 15.2
Fig. 15.3
Fig. 15.4
Fig. 15.5
Fig. 15.6
Fig. 15.7
Fig. 15.8
Fig. 15.9
Fig. 15.10
Fig. 15.11
Fig. 15.12

Suggested Reading

  1. Zavala DC. Diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy: techniques and results of biopsy in 600 patients. Chest. 1975;68:12–9.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rivera MP, Mehta AC. Initial diagnosis of lung cancer. ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd ed.). Chest. 2007;132:131s–48s.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazzone P, Jain P, Arroliga AC, et al. Bronchoscopy and needle biopsy techniques for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Clin Chest Med. 2002;23:137–58.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortese DA, McDougall JC. Bronchoscopy in peripheral and central lesions. In: Prakash UBS, editor. Bronchoscopy. New York: Raven; 1994. p. 135–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tramblay A, Michaud G, Urbanski SJ. Hot biopsy forceps in the diagnosis of endobronchial lesions. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:108–11.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Shure D, Astarita RW. Bronchogenic carcinoma presenting as an endobronchial mass: optimal number of biopsy specimens for diagnosis. Chest. 1983;83:865–7.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kvale PA. Flexible bronchoscopy with brush and forceps biopsy. In: Wang KP, editor. Biopsy techniques in pulmonary disorders. New York: Raven; 1989. p. 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gellert AR, Rudd RM, Sinha G, et al. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy effect of multiple bronchial biopsies on diagnostic yield in bronchogenic carcinoma. Thorax. 1982;37:684–7.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. British Thoracic Society Bronchoscopy Guidelines Committee. British thoracic society guidelines on diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Thorax. 2001;56(suppl I):i1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cordasco EM, Mehta AC, Ahmad M. Bronchoscopically induced bleeding. A summary of nine years’ Cleveland clinic experience and review of the literature. Chest. 1991;100:1141–7.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee P, Mehta AC, Mathur PN. Management of complications from diagnostic and interventional bronchoscopy. Respirology. 2009;14:940–53.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Drift MA, Van der Wilt GJ, Thunnissen FBJM, et al. A prospective study of the timing and cost-effectiveness of bronchial washing during bronchoscopy for pulmonary malignant tumors. Chest. 2005;128:394–400.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Mak VHF, Johnston IDA, Hetzel MR, et al. Value of washing and brushings at fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Thorax. 1990;45:373–6.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lam WK, So SY, Hsu C, Yu DJC. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of bronchial cancer: comparison of washing, brushings and biopsies in central and peripheral tumors. Clin Oncol. 1983;9:35–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jett JR, Cortese DA, Dines DE. The value of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of mycobacterial disease. A five year experience. Chest. 1981;80:575–8.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buirski G, Calverley PMA, Douglas NJ, et al. Bronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of bronchial carcinoma. Thorax. 1981;80:48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shure D, Fedullo PF. Transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of submucosal and peribronchial bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. 1985;88:49–51.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang KP, Haponik EF, Britt EJ, et al. Transbronchial needle aspiration of peripheral pulmonary nodules. Chest. 1984;86:819–23.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gasparini S. Diagnostic management of solitary pulmonary nodule. Eur Respir Mon. 2010;48:90–108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith LS, Seaquist M, Schillaci RF. Comparison of forceps used for transbronchial lung biopsy. Bigger may not be better. Chest. 1985;87:574–6.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wahidi MM, Shofer SL, Sporn TA, Erns A. Comparison of transbronchial lung biopsy yield between standard forceps and electrocautery hot forceps in swine. Respiration. 2010;79:137–40.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Gasparini S, Ferretti M, Bichi Secchi E, et al. Integration of transbronchial and percutaneous approach in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules or masses. Experience with 1,027 consecutive cases. Chest. 1995;108:131–7.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Katis K, Inglesos E, Zachariadis E, et al. The role of transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral lung masses or nodules. Eus Respir J. 1995;8:963–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Naidich DP, Sussman R, Kutcher WL, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: CT-bronchoscopic correlation. Chest. 1988;93:595–8.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang KP, Terry PB. Transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of bronchogenic carcinoma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127:344–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang KP. Flexible transbronchial needle aspiration for histology specimens. Chest. 1985;88:860–3.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Herth FJF, Rabe KF, Gasparini S, et al. Transbronchial and transesophageal (ultrasound guided) needle aspiration for the analysis of mediastinal lesions. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:1264–75.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang KP. Staging of bronchogenic carcinoma by bronchoscopy. Chest. 1995;106:588–93.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Dasgupta A, Mehta AC. Transbronchial needle aspiration. An underused diagnostic technique. Clin Chest Med. 1999;20:39–51.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Harrow EM, Abi-Saleh W, Blum J, et al. The utility of transbronchial needle aspiration in the staging of bronchogenic carcinoma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:601–7.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Holty JE, Kuschner WG, Gould MK. Accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 2005;60:949–55.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Trisolini R, Lazzari Agli L, Cancellieri A, et al. The value of flexible transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of stage I sarcoidosis. Chest. 2003;124:2126–30.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gasparini, S. (2013). Conventional Biopsy Techniques. In: Ernst, A., Herth, F. (eds) Principles and Practice of Interventional Pulmonology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4292-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4292-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4291-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4292-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)