Advertisement

A Pressure-Dependent Nonlinear Viscoelastic Schapery Model for POM

  • D. Tscharnuter
  • S. Gastl
  • G. Pinter
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of POM was characterized in tensile and compression tests. Digital image correlation strain measurements were used the determine the axial and transverse strain, thus providing the necessary data for three-dimensional modeling. The nonlinear viscoelastic model of Schapery was chosen to describe the time-dependent mechanical behavior. A parameter identification procedure using nonlinear optimization is presented. It is shown that the Schapery model is capable of describing the nonlinear viscoelastic relaxation behavior in tension and compression.

Keywords

Digital Image Correlation Relaxation Test Transverse Strain Stress Relaxation Test Prony Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research work of this paper was performed at the Polymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH (PCCL, Austria) within the framework of the COMET-program of the Austrian Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and Technology with contributions by the University of Leoben. The PCCL is funded by the Austrian Government and the State Governments of Styria and Upper Austria.

References

  1. 1.
    Silano A, Pae K, Sauer J (1977) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on shear deformation of polymers. J Appl Phys 48(10):4076–4084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jerabek M, Tscharnuter D, Major Z, Ravi-Chandar K, Lang R (2010) Relaxation behavior of neat and particulate filled polypropylene in uniaxial and multiaxial compression. Mech Time Depend Mater 14(1):47–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rabinowitz S, Ward I, Parry J (1970) The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the shear yield behaviour of polymers. J Mater Sci 5:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pae K (1977) The macroscopic yielding behaviour of polymers in multiaxial stress fields. J Mater Sci 12:1209–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qvale D, Ravi-Chandar K (2004) Viscoelastic characterization of polymers under multiaxial compression. Mech Time Depend Mater 8(3):193–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lévesque M, Derrien K, Baptiste D, Gilchrist M (2008) On the development and parameter identification of schapery-type constitutive theories. Mech Time Depend Mater 12(2):95–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nordin L-O, Varna J (2005) Nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of paper fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol 65(10):1069–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sawant S, Muliana A (2008) A thermo-mechanical viscoelastic analysis of orthotropic materials. Compos Struct 83(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schapery R (1969) On the characterization of nonlinear viscoelastic materials. Polym Eng Sci 9(4):295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nordin L-O, Varna J (2005) Methodology for parameter identification in nonlinear viscoelastic material model. Mech Time Depend Mater 9(4):57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henriksen M (1984) Nonlinear viscoelastic stress analysis – a finite element approach. Comput Struct 18(1):133–139Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tscharnuter D, Jerabek M, Major Z, Pinter G (In Press) Uniaxial nonlinear viscoelastic viscoplastic modeling of polypropylene. Mech Time Depend MaterGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jerabek M, Major Z, Lang R (2010) Strain determination of polymeric materials using digital image correlation. Polym Test 29(3):407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jerabek M, Major Z, Lang R (2010) Uniaxial compression testing of polymeric materials. Polym Test 29(3):302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutton M, Yan J, Tiwari V, Schreier H, Orteu J (2008) The effect of out-of-plane motion on 2d and 3d digital image correlation measurements. Opt Lasers Eng 46(10):746–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crochon T, Schönherr T, Li C, Lévesque M (2010) On finite-element implementation strategies ofschapery-type constitutive theories. Mech Time Depend Mater 14:359–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rao S (1996) Engineering optimization – theory and practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tscharnuter D, Jerabek M, Major Z, Pinter G (2011) Irreversible deformation of isotactic polypropylene in the pre-yield regime. Eur Polym J 47(5):989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polymer Competence Center Leoben GmbHLeobenAustria
  2. 2.Institute of Materials Science and Testing of PlasticsLeobenAustria

Personalised recommendations