Advertisement

A Nucleus at the Heart of the Atom

  • Bernard Fernandez
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of atoms has existed for centuries, ever since the speculations of Epicurus, until the hesitations of the abbot Nollet. The first experimental manifestations and the conjectures of Dalton, Avogadro and Prout. The atom, a modest point-like object at first, becomes adorned with spectral lines and claims the right to possess an internal structure.

Keywords

Electric Charge Atomic Weight Helium Atom Zinc Sulphide Marie Curie 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lucretius, On the Nature of the Universe (De rerum natura), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997. A verse translation by Ronald Melville.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nollet, A., Leçons de Physique Expérimentale, chez Durand, Paris, 1743.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richter, J. B., Anfangsgründe der Stöchyometrie oder Meßkunst chymischer Elemente, J. F. Korn, Breslau & Hirschberg, 1792–94.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Proust, J. L., “Extrait d’un Mémoire intitulé : Recherches sur le Bleu de Prusse”, Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d’Histoire naturelle et des Arts 2, 334–341, novembre 1794.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Proust, J. L., “Recherches sur le bleu de Prusse”, Journal de Physique, de Chimie et d’Histoire naturelle 6, 241–251, 1799.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dalton, J., New System of Chemical Philosophy. Vol. 1, Bickerstaff, Manchester, Part I, 1808; Part II, 1810.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morselli, M., Amedeo Avogadro, a scientific biography, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avogadro, A., “Essai d’une manière de déterminer les masses relatives des molécules élémentaires des corps et les proportions selon lesquelles elles entrent dans ces combinaisons”, Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d’Histoire naturelle et des Arts 73, 58–76, 1811.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ampère, A. M., “Lettre de M. Ampère à M. le comte Berthollet sur la détermination des proportions dans lesquelles les corps se combinent d’après le nombre et la disposition respective des molécules dont leurs parties intégrantes sont composées”, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, Paris 90, 43–86, April 30, 1814.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prout, W., “On the Relation between the Specific Gravities of Bodies in their Gaseous State and the Weights of their Atoms”, Annals of Philosophy 6, 321–330, November 1815.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prout, W., “Correction of a Mistake in the Essay on the Relation between the Specific Gravities of Bodies in their Gaseous State and the Weight of their Atoms”, Annals of Philosophy 7, 111–113, February 1816.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brock, W. H. and Knight, D. M., “The Atomic Debates”, in The Atomic Debates. Brodie and the Rejection of the Atomic Theory, pp. 1–30, Leicester University Press, Leicester, 1967.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ganot, A., Traité élémentaire de physique expérimentale et appliquée, chez l’auteur, Paris, 1853.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ganot, A., Introductory course of natural philosophy, A.S. Barnes & Burr, New York, 1862.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tait, P. G., Properties of matter, Adam, Edinburgh, 1885, p. 19.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nye, M. J. (editor), The Question of the Atom from the Karlsruhe Congress to the first Solvay Conference, 1860–1911, Tomash Publishers, Los Angeles/San Francisco, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stas, J. S., “Recherches sur les rapports réciproques des poids atomiques”, Bulletins de l’Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique pp. 208–336, session of August 4, 1860.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maxwell, J. C., “Illustration of the Dynamical Theory of Gases.— Part I. On the Motions and collisions of Perfectly Elastic Spheres”, Philosophical Magazine 19, 19–32, January 1860.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loschmidt, J. J., “Zur Grösse der Luftmolecüle”, Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 52, 395–413, session of October 12, 1866.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nye, M. J., Molecular reality: a perspective on the scientific work of Jean Perrin, Macdonald, London and American Elsevier, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Charpentier-Morize, M., Perrin, savant et homme politique, Belin, Paris, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perrin, J., “Rayons cathodiques et rayons de Röntgen. Étude expérimentale.”, Annales de chimie et de physique, Paris 11, 496–554, August 1897.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perrin, J., “Les hypothèses moléculaires”, Revue Scientifique 15, 449–61, April 13, 1901.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perrin, J., “Mouvement brownien et réalité moléculaire”, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, Paris 18, 5–114, 1909.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perrin, J., Les Atomes, Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris, 1913. English translation by D. Ll. Hammick: Atoms, Constable & Co., London, 1916.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rydberg, J., “La distribution des raies spectrales”, in Congrès International de Physique, edited by Guillaume, C.-É. and Poincaré, L., Vol. II, pp. 200–224, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1900.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Balmer, J. J., “Notiz über die Spektrallinien des Wasserstoffs”, Annalen der Physik, Leipzig 25, 80–87, 1885.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomson, J. J., “On the charge of electricity carried by the ions produced by Röntgen rays”, Philosophical Magazine 46, 528–545, December 1898.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Millikan, R. A., “The Isolation of an Ion, a Precision Measurement of its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes’s Law”, Physical Review 32, 349–397, April 1911.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thomson, J. J., “On the Masses of the Ions in Gases at Low Pressure”, Philosophical Magazine 48, 547–567, December 1899.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rayleigh, John William Strutt, B., The life of Sir J. J. Thomson, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1942.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nagaoka, H., “Kinetics of a System of Particles illustrating the Line and the Band Spectrum and the Phenomena of Radioactivity”, Philosophical Magazine 7, 445–455, May 1904.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kelvin, L., “Aepinus Atomized”, Philosophical Magazine 3, 257–283, March 1902.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thomson, J. J., “On the Structure of the Atom : an investigation of the Stability and Periods of Oscillation of a number of Corpuscles arranged at equal intervals around circumference of a Circle; with Application to the results to the Theory of Atomic Structure”, Philosophical Magazine 7, 237–265, March 1904.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mayer, A. M., “Floating Magnets”, Nature 17, 487–488, April 18, 1878, and 18, 258–260, July 4, 1878.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Perrin, J., “Décharge par les rayons de Röntgen. - Rôle des surfaces frappées”, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 124, 455–458, session of March 1, 1897.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sagnac, G., “Sur les propriétés des gaz traversés par les rayons X et sur les propriétés des corps luminescents ou photographiques”, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 125, 168–171, session of July 12, 1897.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sagnac, G., “Sur la transformation des rayons X par les métaux”, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 125, 230–232, session of July 26, 1897.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Curie, P. and Sagnac, G., “Électrisation négative des rayons secondaires produits au moyen des rayons Röntgen”, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 130, 1013–1016, session of April 9, 1900.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Curie, P. and Sagnac, G., “Électrisation négative des rayons secondaires issus de la transformation des rayons X”, Journal de Physique 1, 13–21, 1902.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Barkla, C. G., “Secondary Radiation from Gases subject to X-Rays”, Philosophical Magazine 5, 685–698, June 1903.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Barkla, C. G., “Energy of Secondary Röntgen Radiation”, Philosophical Magazine 7, 543–560, May 1904.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thomson, J. J., Conduction of Electricity through Gases, At the University Press, Cambridge, 1903. Reprint by Dover, New York 1969.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thomson, J. J., “On the Number of Corpuscles in an Atom”, Philosophical Magazine 11, 769–781, June 1906.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pais, A., Inward Bound. Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World, Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, London/New York, 1986, p. 187.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Barkla, C. G., “On the Energy of Scattered X-radiation”, Philosophical Magazine 21, 648–652, May 1911.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Skłodowska-Curie, M., “Sur la pénétration des rayons de Becquerel non déviables par le champ magnétique”, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 130, 76–79, session of January 8, 1900.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Curie, P. and Curie, M., “Les nouvelles substances radioactives et les rayons qu’elles émettent”, in Travaux du Congrès international de physique réuni à Paris en 1900, Vol. 3, pp. 79–114.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Caroe, G. M., William Henry Bragg, 1862–1942 : man and scientist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1978, p. 43.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bragg, W. H., “On the Absorption of α Rays, and on the Classification of the α Rays from Radium”, Philosophical Magazine 8, 719–725, December 1904.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bragg, W. H. and Kleeman, R. D., “On the Ionization Curves of Radium”, Philosophical Magazine 8, 726–739, December 1904.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bragg, W. H. and Kleeman, R. D., “On the α Particles of Radium, and their Loss of Range in passing through various Atoms and Molecules”, Philosophical Magazine 10, 318–340, September 1905.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    McClung, R. K., “The absorption of α rays”, Philosophical Magazine 11, 131–142, January 1906.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kučera, B. and Mašek, B., “Über die Strahlung des Radiotellurs. I”, Physikalische Zeitschrift 7, 337–340, May 15, 1906.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kučera, B. and Mašek, B., “Über die Strahlung des Radiotellurs. II”, Physikalische Zeitschrift 7, 630–640, September 15, 1906.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rutherford, E., “Some properties of the α Rays from Radium”, Philosophical Magazine 10, 163–176, July 1905.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rutherford, E., “Some properties of the α Rays from Radium”, Philosophical Magazine 11, 166–176, January 1906.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rutherford, E., “The Retardation of the Velocity of the α Particles in passing through Matter”, Philosophical Magazine 11, 553–554, April 1906.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rutherford, E., “Retardation of the Velocity of the α Particles in passing through Matter”, Philosophical Magazine 12, 134–146, August 1906.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kučera, B. and Mašek, B., “Über die Strahlung des Radiotellurs III. Die Sekundärstrahlung der α-Strahlen”, Physikalische Zeitschrift 7, 650–654, October 1906.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Meitner, L., “Über die Zerstreuung der α-Strahlen”, Physikalische Zeitschrift 8, 489–491, August 1, 1907.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Meyer, E., “Die Absorption der α-Strahlen in Metallen”, Physikalische Zeitschrift 8, 425–430, July 1, 1907.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Feather, N., Lord Rutherford, 1973, p. 117.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rutherford, E., “Recent Advances in Radio-activity”, Nature 77, 422–426, March 5, 1908. A discourse delivered at the Royal Institution on Friday, January 31, 1908.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Krebs, A. T., “Hans Geiger, Fiftieth anniversary of the publication of his doctoral thesis, 23 July 1906”, Science 124, 166, july 27, 1956.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Haxel, O., “Hans Geiger als Wissenschaftler und Lehrer”, in Detectors in Heavy Ion Reactions, Symposium Commemorating the 100th anniversary of Hans Geiger’s birth, edited by von Oertzen, W., pp. 1–9, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Geiger, H., Strahlungs-, Temperatur- und Potentialmessungen in Entladungsröhren bei Starken Strömen, Ph.D. thesis, Philosophical Faculty of the Friedrich-Aleanders-University, Erlangen, July 23, 1906.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Robinson, H. R., “Rutherford : Life and Work to the Year 1919, with personal Reminiscences of the Manchester Period”, in Rutherford at Manchester, edited by Birks, J. B., pp. 53–86, Heywood and Co Ltd., London, 1962.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Russel, A. S., “Lord Rutherford at Manchester, 1907–19: a partial portrait”, in Rutherford at Manchester, pp. 93–101.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Townsend, J. S., “The Conductivity produced in Gases by the Motion of Negatively charged ions”, Philosophical Magazine 1, 198–227, February 1901.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Townsend, J. S. and Kirkby, P. J., “Conductivity produced in Hydrogen and Carbonic Acid Gas by the Motion of Negatively Charged Ions”, Philosophical Magazine 1, 630–642, June 1901.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Townsend, J. S., “The Conductivity produced in Gases by the Aid of Ultra-Violet Light”, Philosophical Magazine 3, 557–576, June 1902, and 5, 389–398, April 1903; “On Ionisation produced by the Motion of Positive and Negative Ions”, Philosophical Magazine 6, 358–361, September 1903.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Townsend, J. S., “The Genesis of Ions by the Motion of Positive Ions in a Gas and a Theory of the Sparking Potential”, Philosophical Magazine 6, 598–618, November 1903.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kirkby, P. J., “On the Electrical Conductivities produced in Air by the Motion of Negative Ions”, Philosophical Magazine 3, 212–225, February 1902.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rutherford, E. and Geiger, H., “A Method of Counting the Number of α-Particles from Radio-active Matter”, Memoirs of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 52, 1–3, 1908.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Rutherford, E. and Geiger, H., “An Electrical Method of Counting the Number of α-Particles from Radio-active Substances”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London A81, 141–161, 1908.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rutherford, E. and Geiger, H., “The Charge and Nature of the α-Particle”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London A81, 162–173, session of June 18, 1908.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Crookes, W., “Certain Properties of the Emanations of Radium”, Chemical News 87, 241, May 22, 1903.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Elster, J. and Geitel, H., “Über die durch radioaktive Emanation erregte szintillierende Phosphoreszenz der Sidot-Blende”, Physikalische Zeitschrift 4, 439–40, August 1, 1903.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Regener, E., “Über Zählung der α-Teilchen durch die Szintillation und die Grösse des elektrischen Elementarquantums”, Verhandlungen der deutschen physikalischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin 10, 78–83, session of February 7, 1908.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Geiger, H., “On the Scattering of the α Particles by Matter”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London A81, 174–177, session of June 18, 1908.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Geiger, H., “The Scattering of the α- Particles by Matter”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London A83, 492–504, session of February 17, 1910.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Needham, N. J. T. M. and Pagel, W. J. O. (editors), Background to Modern Science. Ten lectures at Cambridge arranged by the History of Science Committee, 1936, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1938.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rutherford, E., “Forty Years of Physics”, in Background to Modern Science, pp. 47–74, at the University Press, Cambridge, 1938.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Rutherford, E., “Forty Years of Physics”, in Background of Modern Science, p. 68.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Geiger, H. and Marsden, E., “On a Diffuse Reflection of the α-Particles”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London A82, 495–500, 1909.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Rayleigh, John William Strutt, B., Theory of Sound, Macmillan, London, 1877.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rutherford, E., letter to B. Boltwood, dated March 18, 1912, in Rutherford and Boltwood: letters on Radioactivity, edited by Badash, L., p. 265, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1969.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Geiger, H., “Some Reminiscences of Rutherford during his time in Manchester”, in The Collected Papers of Lord Rutherford of Nelson, edited by Chadwick, J., Vol. 2, pp. 295–298, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London, 1963.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Rutherford, E., “The Scattering of α and β Rays and the Structure of the Atom”, Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society IV, 55, 18–20, 1911.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Rutherford, E., “The Scattering of α and β Particles by Matter and the Structure of the Atom”, Philosophical Magazine 21, 669–698, May 1911.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Earnshaw, S., “On the Nature of the Molecular Forces which Regulate the Constitution of the Luminiferous Ether”, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 7, 97–112, 1842.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Rutherford, E., “The Origin of β and γ Rays from Radioactive Substances”, Philosophical Magazine 24, 453–462, October 1912.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Barkla, C. G., “Polarisation in Secondary Röntgen Radiation”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London A77, 247–255, session of February 8, 1906.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Barkla, C. G., “Secondary Röntgen Radiation”, Philosophical Magazine 11, 812–828, June 1906.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Barkla, C. G., “Secondary X-Rays and the Atomic Weight of Nickel”, Philosophical Magazine 14, 408–422, September 1907.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Barkla, C. G., “Note on X-Rays and Scattered X-Rays”, Philosophical Magazine 15, 288–296, February 1908.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Barkla, C. G. and Sadler, C. A., “The Absorption of Röntgen Rays”, Philosophical Magazine 17, 739–760, May 1909.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Barkla, C. G., “Typical Cases of Ionization by X-Rays”, Philosophical Magazine 20, 370–379, August 1910.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Barkla, C. G. and Ayres, T., “The Distribution of Secondary X-rays and the Electromagnetic Pulse Theory”, Philosophical Magazine 21, 270–278, February 1911.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Barkla, C. G., “The Spectra of Fluorescent Röntgen Radiation”, Philosophical Magazine [6] 22, 396–412, September 1911.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Gouy, L.-G., “Sur la réfraction des rayons X”, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 122, 1197–1198, session of May 2, 1896.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Haga, H. and Wind, C. H., “Die Beugung der Röntgenstralen”, Annalen der Physik, Leipzig 10, 305–312, 1903.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Walter, B. and Pohl, R., “Weitere Versuche über die Beugung der Röntgenstrahlen”, Annalen der Physik, Leipzig 29, 331–354, 1909.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    von Laue, M., Friedrich, W. and Knipping, P., “Interferenz-Erscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen”, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften pp. 303–322, session of June 8, 1912.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    von Laue, M., “Eine quantative Prüfung der Theorie für die Interferenz-Erscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen”, Sitzungsberichte der Bayerishen Akademie der Wissenschaften pp. 363–373, session of July 6, 1912.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Bragg, W. H. and Bragg, W. L., “The Reflection of X-rays by Crystals”, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London A88, 428–438, session of April 7, 1913.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Bragg, W. H., “X-rays and Crystals”, Nature 92, 307, November 6, 1913.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Heilbron, J. L., H. G. J. Moseley: the life and letters of an English physicist, 1887–1915, University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Moseley, H. G. J. and Darwin, C. G., “The Reflection of the X-rays”, Philosophical Magazine 26, 210–232, July 1913.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Moseley, H. G. J., “The High-Frequency Spectra of the Elements”, Philosophical Magazine 26, 1024–1034, December 1913.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Moseley, H. G. J., “The high frequency spectra of the elements. Part II”, Philosophical Magazine 27, 703–713, April 1914.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Rutherford, E., letter to B. Boltwood, dated September 14, 1915, in Rutherford and Boltwood: letters on Radioactivity, edited by Badash, L., p. 311.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Fernandez
    • 1
  1. 1.VanvesFrance

Personalised recommendations