Advertisement

Resource Theory and Restoration: What is Restored in Restorative Justice?

  • Ronald L. Cohen
Chapter
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

Both restorative justice and resource theory focus attention on harmful interactions whose resolution sometimes requires the involvement of a third party. Ronald Cohen, in this chapter, reviews recent work in both traditions and underscores the importance of identifying and examining three issues that have escaped systematic attention. First, the nature of the central roles of victim, perpetrator, and “community” need to be clarified. Second, the complexities involved in shifting from a dyadic to a triadic social relation need to be addressed. And, third, the discursive dimension of status alignments and realignments needs to be analyzed. Cohen offers suggestions about why these issues are important and how they might be addressed.

Keywords

Restorative Justice Transitional Justice Resource Theory Indirect Reciprocity Strong Reciprocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Auerbach, Y. (2009). The reconciliation-pyramid: A narrative-based framework for analyzing identity conflicts. Political Psychology, 30(2), 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, A., & Wotman, S. R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 994–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Bradt, L., Vettenburg, N., & Roose, R. (2007). Relevant others in restorative practices for minors: For what purposes? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  8. Christie, N. (2010). Victim movements at a crossroads. Punishment & Society, 12(2), 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clairmont, S., & Kenney, J. S. (2008). Using the victim role as both sword and shield: The interactional dynamics of restorative justice sessions. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(3), 279–307.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, R. L. (2001). Provocations of restorative justice. Social Justice Research, 14(2), 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dignan, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G., & Sorsby, A. (2007). Staging restorative justice encounters against a criminal justice backdrop. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donnenworth, G., & Foa, U. G. (1974). Effect of resource class on retaliation to injustice in interpersonal exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(6), 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunn, J. L. (2005). “Victims” and “Survivors”: Emerging vocabularies of motive for “Battered Women Who Stay”. Sociological Inquiry, 75(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fast, N. J., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2010). Blame contagion: The automatic transmission of self-serving attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fehr, W., & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  17. Giner-Sorolla, R., Castano, E., Espinosa, P., & Brown, R. (2008). Shame expressions reduce the recipient’s insult from outgroup reparations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray, P. (2005). The politics of risk and young offenders’ experiences of social exclusion and restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 45(6), 938–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green, J. D., Burnette, J. L., & Davis, J. L. (2008). Third-party forgiveness: (Not) forgiving your close other’s betrayer. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3), 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2009). Retributive and restorative justice: Importance of crime severity and shared identity in people’s justice responses. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haldemann, F. (2008). Another kind of justice: Transitional justice as recognition. Cornell International Law Journal, 41, 675–729.Google Scholar
  22. Henry, P. J. (2009). Low-status compensation: A theory for understanding the role of status in cultures of honor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hilker, L. M. (2009). Everyday ethnicities: Identity and reconciliation among Rwandan youth. Journal of Genocide Research, 11(1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holt, A. (2009). Disciplining ‘Problem Parents’ in the youth court: Between regulation and resistance. Social Policy & Society, 9(1), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kalish, Y. (2008). Bridging in social networks: Who are the people in structural holes and why are they there? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kam, C. C.-S., & Bond, M. H. (2009). Emotional reactions of anger and shame to the norm violation characterizing episodes of interpersonal harm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karp, D. R. (2004). Harm and repair: Observing restorative justice in Vermont. Justice Quarterly, 18, 727–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelman, H. C. (2007). The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes. American Psychologist, 30(2), 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kenney, J. S., & Clairmont, D. (2009). Using the victim role as both sword and shield: The interactional dynamics of restorative justice sessions. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38, 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keysar, B., Converse, B. A., Wang, J., & Epley, N. (2008). Reciprocity is not give and take: Asymmetric reciprocity to positive and negative acts. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1280–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klapwijk, A., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2009). Promoting cooperation and trust in “noisy” situations: The power of generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leisenring, A. (2006). Confronting ‘victim’ discourse: The identity work of battered women. Symbolic Interaction, 29(3), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindemann, G. (2005). The analysis of the borders of the social world: A challenge for sociological theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(1), 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Molm, L. D., Schaefer, D. R., & Collett, J. L. (2007). The value of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2003). In the eye of the beholder: Procedural justice in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 68, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mosquero, P. M., Fischer, A. H., Manstead, A. S. R., & Zaalberg, R. (2008). Attack, disapproval, or withdrawal? The role of honour in anger and shame responses to being insulted. Cognition and Emotion, 22(8), 1471–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nelissen, R. M. A., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), 543–553.Google Scholar
  40. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Outcomes as affirmation of membership value: Material compensation as an administrative response to procedural injustice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1270–1282. DOI:dx.doi.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Feather, N. T. (2009). Beyond retribution: Conceptualizing restorative justice and exploring its determinants. Social Justice Research, 22, 156–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2007). From social talk to social action: Shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 780–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Presser, L., & Hamilton, C. (2006). The micro-politics of victim-offender mediation. Sociological Inquiry, 76, 316–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rodogno, R. (2008). Shame and guilt in restorative justice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(2), 142–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2002). Honor in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scarnier, M., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2009). Parental shame and guilt: Emotional reactions to a child’s wrongdoing. Personal Relationships, 16, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheff, T. (1997, August 4). Honor and shame: Local peace-making through community conferences? Downloaded 7 Mar 2010 from http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/faculty/scheff/main.php?id=6.html
  49. Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stensrud, E. M. (2009). New dilemmas in transitional justice: Lessons from the mixed courts in Sierra Leone and Cambodia. Journal of Peace Research, 46(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stillwell, A. M., Baumeister, R. F., & Del Priore, R. E. (2008). We’re all victims here: Toward a psychology of revenge. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Törnblom, K., & Vermunt, R. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12(1), 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Törnblom, K., & Vermunt, R. (2007). Towards an integration of distributive justice, procedural justice, and social resource theories. Social Justice Research, 20, 312–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Chin, J. (2007). Feeling duped: Emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of being exploited by others. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weber, J. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (2008). Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1340–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weisberg, R. (2003). The practice of restorative justice: Restorative justice and the danger of “community”. Utah Law Review, 1, 343–374.Google Scholar
  61. Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2010). How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 401–417.Google Scholar
  62. Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2010). Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 909–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zechmeister, J. S., & Romero, C. (2002). Victim and offender accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives of forgiveness and unforgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 675–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bennington CollegeBenningtonUSA

Personalised recommendations