Abstract
Almost 70 million cases of glaucoma have been diagnosed worldwide, approximately half of which are classified as angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). Among patients with angle closure, primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is the most common diagnosis. Angle closure results from apposition of the peripheral iris to the trabecular meshwork (iridotrabecular contact – ITC). Four current methods for diagnosing the classification of angle-closure glaucoma are presented. The individual with an anatomically narrow angle can be classified as a primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) when gonioscopy reveals a shallow peripheral angle recess with the iris close to the trabecular meshwork. In an acute primary angle-closure attack, there is a sudden obstruction of the anterior chamber (AC) angle with an acute elevation of the intraocular pressure to very high levels. In chronic PACG, the angle usually closes gradually over time. The natural history of asymptomatic progression to blindness may be analogous to POAG. The possibility to visualize the anterior segment structures with imaging techniques such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) has enhanced our ability to better anatomically classify the angle-closure glaucoma, determine the mechanisms involved, and institute proper therapy. Plateau iris configuration and plateau iris syndrome are conditions that are often confused with pupillary block and PAC. Laser peripheral iridoplasty can open the angle in plateau iris syndrome. Conditions classified as secondary angle-closure glaucoma are associated with other ocular or systemic abnormalities. Gonioscopy is essential to identifying the underlying anatomy and pathophysiology of angle closure in order to properly classify the type of glaucoma and initiate treatment. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have proven to be a useful adjunct to gonioscopy. Pupillary block is the most frequent etiology of angle closure and the underlying mechanism of most cases of PACG. Acute primary angle closure, an “acute glaucoma attack,” results from sudden pupillary block causing a typical symptom complex. The initial treatment for an acute attack of PACG is to lower the intraocular pressure and relieve the pupillary block. Currently, laser iridotomy (yttrium–aluminum–garnet [YAG] or argon laser) is the primary initial treatment for PACG. A newer approach to the management of angle-closure glaucoma is the consideration of cataract extraction. Primary lensectomy, especially when lens opacity is present, has been increasingly established as an effective treatment of primary angle closure either as an isolated procedure, accompanied by goniosynechialysis, or combined with trabeculectomy. Chronic angle closure is a term used for eyes in which the angle gradually narrows without precipitating an acute attack. An open-angle glaucoma patient may narrow then deepen after laser iridotomy but with the pressure remaining elevated, with or without peripheral anterior synechial formation. This condition is termed “combined mechanism” glaucoma or “mixed-mechanism” glaucoma. Various forms of lens-induced “secondary angle closure” with pupillary block have been described. Phacomorphic glaucoma occurs secondary to a large anteriorly displaced lens. In Weill–Marchesani syndrome (microspherophakia), patients are characteristically of short stature with spade-like hands (brachydactyly). Partially or completely dislocated lenses in numerous conditions associated with ectopia lentis can result in secondary angle closure. Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition with a physical appearance the opposite of Weill–Marchesani associated with lens-related glaucoma. Homocystinuria, an autosomal recessive disease manifesting in a disorder of homocysteine metabolism, is also associated with lens-related glaucoma. Intraocular lenses (IOLs) can cause pseudophakic secondary angle closure when the optic of the anterior chamber lens (ACIOL) implant blocks communication of aqueous between the posterior and anterior chambers. Secondary angle closure may occur without pupillary block. Aqueous misdirection syndrome is also termed posterior aqueous diversion or ciliary block glaucoma. It was originally named malignant glaucoma because of its relentless course and poor response to treatment, until its physiologic mechanisms were better understood. Neovascular glaucoma results from the occlusion of the trabecular meshwork and secondary closure of the angle by fibrovascular membrane formation. Iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome was termed to encompass a spectrum of abnormalities that share a disorder of the corneal endothelium. Epithelial and fibrous downgrowth are rare surgical complications resulting in secondary angle closure. Inflammation associated with a variety of ocular and systemic conditions can cause trabeculitis or synechia formation with secondary angle closure. Posterior scleritis may result in large uveal effusions resulting in secondary angle closure. Various retinal disorders and treatments can result in secondary angle-closure glaucoma. Primary or secondary uveal effusions can cause a forward displacement of the iris. Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) can cause choroidal swelling with secondary closure as can extensive retinal photocoagulation for CRVO or proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Topiramate (Topamax) systemic medical therapy for epilepsy, migraine, and other neurological conditions is well documented to cause acute bilateral secondary angle-closure glaucoma.
Nanophthalmos is characterized by a short, less than 20 mm axial length eye with a small corneal diameter, large lens, and thick sclera. Continued advances in diagnostics, imaging systems, and therapeutics have revolutionized the management of angle-closure glaucoma.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hyams S. Angle-closure glaucoma: a comprehensive review of primary and secondary angle-closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini; 1990.
Lowe RF. A history of primary angle closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;40:163–70.
Foster PJ. Epidemiology, classification and mechanism. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 1–20.
Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1277–82.
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–7.
Wang N, Li S, Liang Y. Classification. In: Hong C, Yamamoto T, editors. Angle closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kuegler; 2007. p. 41–55.
Foster PJ, Buhrman RR, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238–42.
Ritch R, Lowe RF. Angle-closure glaucoma – clinical types. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, editors. The glaucomas. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 801–40.
Filho AD, Cronemberger S, Mérula RV, Calixto N. Comparative study between plateau iris configuration and primary open angle glaucoma with narrow angle using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;43:ARVO E-Abstract 3363.
Ritch R, Tham CCY, et al. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty in the management of plateau iris syndrome: long-term follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:104–8.
Ritch R. Laser and medical treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 37–54.
Peng D, Zhang X, Yu K. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty and laser iridectomy for plateau iris glaucoma. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1997;33:165–8.
Dellaporta A. Historical notes on gonioscopy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1975;20:137–49.
Forbes M. Gonioscopy with corneal indentation: a method for distinguishing between appositional closure and synechial closure. Arch Opthalmol. 1966;76:488–97.
Friedman DS, Mingguang H. Anterior chamber angle assessment techniques. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:250–73.
Ritch R, Liebman J, Tello C. A construct for understanding angle closure glaucoma: the role of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 1995;8:281–93.
Lieberman J. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 71.
Baskaran M. Devices for screening for angle closure. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 73–4.
Tello C, Rothman R, Ishikawa H, Ritch R. Differential diagnosis of the angle closure glaucomas. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2000;13:443–53.
Yao B, Wu L, Zhang C, Wang X. Ultrasound biometric features associated with angle closure in fellow eyes of acute primary angle closure after laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:444–8.
Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F, Toda Y, et al. A newly developed peripheral anterior chamber depth analysis system: principle, accuracy and reproducibility. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1036–41.
Asawaphureekorn S. New approaches to visualize the anterior chamber angle. In: Hong C, Yamamoto T, editors. Angle closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kuegler; 2007. p. 101–13.
Nolan WP, Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ, Baasanhu J. YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angleclosure in east Asian eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1255–9.
Gazzard G, Friedman DS, Devereux JG, Chew PT, Seah SK. A prospective ultrasound biomicroscopy evaluation of changes in anterior segment morphology after laser iridotomy in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:630–8.
Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, et al. Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1484–90.
Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukuhara S, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan – a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133–53.
Foster PJ, Gaasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Mongolia – a population-based survey in Hovsgol Province, Northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1235–41.
Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. The Tajimi Study report 2: prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1661–9.
Bourne RRA, Sukudom P, Foster PJ, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in Thailand: a population based survey in Rom Klao District, Bangkok. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1069–74.
Salmon JF, Mermoud A, Ivey A, Swanevelder SA, Hoffman M. The prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma and open angle glaucoma in Mamre, Western Cape, South Africa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1263–9.
Seah SKL, Foster PJ, Chew PT, et al. Incidence of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma in Singapore. An island-wide survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1436–40.
Alsbirk PH. Anterior chamber depth in Greenland Eskimos. I. A population study of variation with age and sex. Acta Ophthalmol. 1974;52:551–64.
Foster PJ, Alsbirk PH, Baasanhu J, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Anterior chamber depth in Mongolians. Variation with age, sex and method of measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:53–60.
Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:186–92.
Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:257–63.
Chang BM, Liebman JM, Ritch R. Angle closure in younger patients. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:201–14.
Coffi GA, Durcan FJ, Girkin CA et al. Angle Closure Glaucoma. Chapter 5 in Section 10 of Basic and clinical science course 2008–2009. Am Acad Ophthalmol. 2008;5:126–8.
Van Rens GH, Arkell SM, Charlton W, Doesburg W. Primary angleclosure glaucoma among Alaskan Eskimos. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988;70:265–76.
Arkell SM, Lightman DA, Sommer A, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma among Eskimos of northwest Alaska. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:482–5.
Bourne RR, Sorensen KE, Klauber A, et al. Glaucoma in east greenlandic inuit – a population survey in Ittoqqortoormiit (Scoresbysund). Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:462–7.
Congdon NG, Quigley HA, Hung PT, et al. Screening techniques for angle-closure glaucoma in rural Taiwan. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74:113–9.
Sim DH, Goh LG, Ho T. Glaucoma pattern amongst the elderly Chinese in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1998;27(6):819–23.
Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1710–6.
Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic Subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12):1819–26.
Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:1102–10.
Buhrmann RR, Quigley HA, Barron Y, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in a rural East African population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:40–8.
Rotchford AP, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Zulus: a population-based cross-sectional survey in a rural district in South Africa. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:471–8.
Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:209–15.
Bankes JL, Perkins ES, Tsolakis S, Wright JE. Bedford glaucoma survey. Br Med J. 1968;1:791–6.
Bengtsson B. The prevalence of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981;65:46–9.
Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1966;50:570–86.
Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1499–504.
Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:17–21.
Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Epidemiology of angleclosure glaucoma: prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in the Egna-Neumarket Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:998–1003.
Congdon N, Wang F, Tielsch JM. Issues in the epidemiology and population-based screening of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992;36:411–23.
Erie JC, Hodge DO, Gray DT. The incidence of primary angle-closure glaucoma in Olmstead County, Minnesota. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:177–81.
Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1105–11.
Congdon NG, Qi Y, Quigley HA, et al. Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese. White and Black populations. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1489–95.
Aung T, Nolan WP, Machin D, et al. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:527–32.
Seider MI, Pekmezci M, Han Y, et al. High prevalence of narrow angles among Chinese American glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(8):578–81.
Wang D, Qi M, He M, et al. Ethnic difference of the anterior chamber area and volume and its association with angle width. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(6):3139–44.
Peng P, Nguyen H, Nguyen N, et al. Glaucoma and clinical characteristics in Vietnamese Americans. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(8):733–8.
Seider MI, Agadzi AK, Lee RY, et al. High prevalence of narrow angles among Filipino-American patients. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:139–42.
Pekmezci M, Vo BT, Lim AK, et al. The characteristics of glaucoma in Japanese Americans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(2):167–71.
Stanley H. Biometry. In: Stanley H, editor. Angle closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini; 1990.
Marchini G, Pagliarusco A, Toscano A, Tosi R, Brunelli C, Bonomi L. Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2091–8.
Quigley HA, Silver DM, Friedman DS, et al. Iris cross-sectional area decreases with pupil dilation and its dynamic behavior is a risk factor in angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:173–83.
Quigley HA. The iris is a sponge: a cause of angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(1):1–2.
Aptel F, Denis P. Optical coherence tomography quantitative analysis of iris volume changes after pharmacologic mydriasis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(1):3–10.
Quigley HA. Angle –closure glaucoma- simpler answers to complex mechanisms: LXVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):657–69.
Fontana SC, Brubaker RF. Volume and depth of the anterior chamber in the normal aging human eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1803–8.
Forbes M. Indentation gonioscopy and efficacy of iridectomy in angleclosure glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1974;72:488–515.
Lam DS, Chua JK, Tham CC, Lai JS. Efficacy and safety of immediate anterior chamber paracentesis in the treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:64–70.
Lam DS, Lai JS, Tham CC, Chua JK, Poon AS. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty versus conventional systemic medical therapy in treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1591–6.
Lai JS, Tham CC, Chua JK, et al. To compare argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) against systemic medications in treatment of acute primary angle-closure: mid-term results. Eye. 2006;20:309–14.
Quaranta L, Bettelli S, et al. Argon laser iridoplasty as primary treatment for acute angle closure glaucoma: a prospective clinical study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 2002;236:16–7.
Aung T, Tow SL, Yap EY, et al. Trabeculectomy for acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1298–302.
Lam DS, Leung DY, Tham CC, et al. Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1134–40.
Hata H, Yamane S, Hata S, et al. Preliminary outcomes of primary phacoemulsification plus intraocular lens implantation for primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Med Invest. 2008;55(3–4):287–91.
Husain R, Gazzard G, Aung T, et al. Initial management of acute primary angle closure: a randomized trial comparing phacoemulsification with laser peripheral iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(11):2274–81.
Campbell DG, Vela A. Modern goniosynechialysis for the treatment of synechial angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(9):1052–60.
Teekhasaenee C, Ritch R. Combined phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis for uncontrolled chronic angle-closure after acute angle closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:669–74.
Harasymowycz PJ, et al. Phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis in the management of unresponsive primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:186–9.
Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, et al. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically controlled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataract. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12):2167–73.
Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, et al. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically uncontrolled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):725–31.
Kang SY, Hong S, Won JB, et al. Inaccuracy of intraocular lens power prediction for cataract surgery in angle -closure glaucoma. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(2):206–10.
Joo J, Whang W, Oh T. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle closure glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011;25(6):375–9.
Ritch R, Stegman Z, Liebmann J. Mapstone’s hypothesis confirmed. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:300.
Alsbirk PH. Anatomical risk factors in primary angle-closure glaucoma. A ten-year follow-up survey based on limbal and axial anterior chamber depths in a high risk population. Int Ophthalmol. 1992;16:265–72.
Wilensky JT, Kaufman PI, Frohlichstein D, et al. Follow-up angleclosure glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:338–46.
Gazzard G, Foster PJ, Friedman DS, Khaw PT, Seah SK. Light to dark physiological variation in irido-trabecular angle width [videotape]. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1357–482.
Lim LS, Husain R, Gazzard G, Seah SK, Aung T. Cataract progression after prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy: potential implications for the prevention of glaucoma blindness. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1355–9.
Robin AL, Pollack IP. A comparison of neodymium: YAG and argon laser iridotomies. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:1011–6.
Schwartz GF, Steinmann WC, Spaeth GL, Wilson RP. Surgical and medical management of patients with narrow anterior chamber angles: comparative results. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:108–12.
Friedman DS, Thomas R, Alsbirk PH, Gazzard G. Detection of primary angle closure glaucoma. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 55–63.
Tarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure glaucoma: the role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54:211–25.
Nelson L, Maumenee IH. Ectopia lentis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1982;27:143–57.
Nemet AY, Assia EI, Apple DJ, Barequet IS. Current concepts of ocular manifestations in Marfan syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006;51:561–75.
Lovisolo CF, Reinstein DZ. Phakic intraocular lenses. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:549–87.
von Graefe A. Beitrage zur Palhologie und Therapie des Glaukoms. Arch Ophthalmol. 1869;15:108.
Klein R. Prevention of visual loss from diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:S246–52.
Gunther JB, Altaweel MM. Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of ocular disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54:372–400.
Yanoff M. Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: unification of a disease spectrum. Surv Ophthalmol. 1979;24:1–20.
Hemady RK, Patel A, Blum S, Nirankari VS. Bilateral iridocorneal endothelial syndrome case report and review of the literature. Cornea. 1994;13:368–72.
Vargas LG, Vroman DT, Soloman KD, Holzer MP, et al. Epithelial downgrowth after clear cornea phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2002;12:2331–5.
Okhravi N, Odufuwa B, McCluskey P, Lightman S. Scleritis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:351–63.
Mendelsohn AD, Jampol LM, Schoch D. Secondary angle-closure after central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100:581–5.
Sodhi A, Leung L, Do DV, Gower EW, Schein OD, Handa JT. Recent trends in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:50–67.
Levy J, Yagev R, Petrova A, Lifshiz T. Topiramate-induced bilateral angle-closure glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41:221–5.
Wiggs JL. Genetic etiologies of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(1):30–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cyrlin, M.N. (2014). Primary and Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucomas. In: Samples, J., Schacknow, P. (eds) Clinical Glaucoma Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4172-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4172-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4171-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4172-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)