Skip to main content

Primary and Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucomas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Almost 70 million cases of glaucoma have been diagnosed worldwide, approximately half of which are classified as angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). Among patients with angle closure, primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is the most common diagnosis. Angle closure results from apposition of the peripheral iris to the trabecular meshwork (iridotrabecular contact – ITC). Four current methods for diagnosing the classification of angle-closure glaucoma are presented. The individual with an anatomically narrow angle can be classified as a primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) when gonioscopy reveals a shallow peripheral angle recess with the iris close to the trabecular meshwork. In an acute primary angle-closure attack, there is a sudden obstruction of the anterior chamber (AC) angle with an acute elevation of the intraocular pressure to very high levels. In chronic PACG, the angle usually closes gradually over time. The natural history of asymptomatic progression to blindness may be analogous to POAG. The possibility to visualize the anterior segment structures with imaging techniques such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) has enhanced our ability to better anatomically classify the angle-closure glaucoma, determine the mechanisms involved, and institute proper therapy. Plateau iris configuration and plateau iris syndrome are conditions that are often confused with pupillary block and PAC. Laser peripheral iridoplasty can open the angle in plateau iris syndrome. Conditions classified as secondary angle-closure glaucoma are associated with other ocular or systemic abnormalities. Gonioscopy is essential to identifying the underlying anatomy and pathophysiology of angle closure in order to properly classify the type of glaucoma and initiate treatment. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have proven to be a useful adjunct to gonioscopy. Pupillary block is the most frequent etiology of angle closure and the underlying mechanism of most cases of PACG. Acute primary angle closure, an “acute glaucoma attack,” results from sudden pupillary block causing a typical symptom complex. The initial treatment for an acute attack of PACG is to lower the intraocular pressure and relieve the pupillary block. Currently, laser iridotomy (yttrium–aluminum–garnet [YAG] or argon laser) is the primary initial treatment for PACG. A newer approach to the management of angle-closure glaucoma is the consideration of cataract extraction. Primary lensectomy, especially when lens opacity is present, has been increasingly established as an effective treatment of primary angle closure either as an isolated procedure, accompanied by goniosynechialysis, or combined with trabeculectomy. Chronic angle closure is a term used for eyes in which the angle gradually narrows without precipitating an acute attack. An open-angle glaucoma patient may narrow then deepen after laser iridotomy but with the pressure remaining elevated, with or without peripheral anterior synechial formation. This condition is termed “combined mechanism” glaucoma or “mixed-mechanism” glaucoma. Various forms of lens-induced “secondary angle closure” with pupillary block have been described. Phacomorphic glaucoma occurs secondary to a large anteriorly displaced lens. In Weill–Marchesani syndrome (microspherophakia), patients are characteristically of short stature with spade-like hands (brachydactyly). Partially or completely dislocated lenses in numerous conditions associated with ectopia lentis can result in secondary angle closure. Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition with a physical appearance the opposite of Weill–Marchesani associated with lens-related glaucoma. Homocystinuria, an autosomal recessive disease manifesting in a disorder of homocysteine metabolism, is also associated with lens-related glaucoma. Intraocular lenses (IOLs) can cause pseudophakic secondary angle closure when the optic of the anterior chamber lens (ACIOL) implant blocks communication of aqueous between the posterior and anterior chambers. Secondary angle closure may occur without pupillary block. Aqueous misdirection syndrome is also termed posterior aqueous diversion or ciliary block glaucoma. It was originally named malignant glaucoma because of its relentless course and poor response to treatment, until its physiologic mechanisms were better understood. Neovascular glaucoma results from the occlusion of the trabecular meshwork and secondary closure of the angle by fibrovascular membrane formation. Iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome was termed to encompass a spectrum of abnormalities that share a disorder of the corneal endothelium. Epithelial and fibrous downgrowth are rare surgical complications resulting in secondary angle closure. Inflammation associated with a variety of ocular and systemic conditions can cause trabeculitis or synechia formation with secondary angle closure. Posterior scleritis may result in large uveal effusions resulting in secondary angle closure. Various retinal disorders and treatments can result in secondary angle-closure glaucoma. Primary or secondary uveal effusions can cause a forward displacement of the iris. Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) can cause choroidal swelling with secondary closure as can extensive retinal photocoagulation for CRVO or proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Topiramate (Topamax) systemic medical therapy for epilepsy, migraine, and other neurological conditions is well documented to cause acute bilateral secondary angle-closure glaucoma.

Nanophthalmos is characterized by a short, less than 20 mm axial length eye with a small corneal diameter, large lens, and thick sclera. Continued advances in diagnostics, imaging systems, and therapeutics have revolutionized the management of angle-closure glaucoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hyams S. Angle-closure glaucoma: a comprehensive review of primary and secondary angle-closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lowe RF. A history of primary angle closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;40:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Foster PJ. Epidemiology, classification and mechanism. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1277–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang N, Li S, Liang Y. Classification. In: Hong C, Yamamoto T, editors. Angle closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kuegler; 2007. p. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foster PJ, Buhrman RR, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ritch R, Lowe RF. Angle-closure glaucoma – clinical types. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, editors. The glaucomas. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 801–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Filho AD, Cronemberger S, Mérula RV, Calixto N. Comparative study between plateau iris configuration and primary open angle glaucoma with narrow angle using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;43:ARVO E-Abstract 3363.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ritch R, Tham CCY, et al. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty in the management of plateau iris syndrome: long-term follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:104–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritch R. Laser and medical treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peng D, Zhang X, Yu K. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty and laser iridectomy for plateau iris glaucoma. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1997;33:165–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dellaporta A. Historical notes on gonioscopy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1975;20:137–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Forbes M. Gonioscopy with corneal indentation: a method for distinguishing between appositional closure and synechial closure. Arch Opthalmol. 1966;76:488–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman DS, Mingguang H. Anterior chamber angle assessment techniques. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:250–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritch R, Liebman J, Tello C. A construct for understanding angle closure glaucoma: the role of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 1995;8:281–93.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lieberman J. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baskaran M. Devices for screening for angle closure. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 73–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tello C, Rothman R, Ishikawa H, Ritch R. Differential diagnosis of the angle closure glaucomas. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2000;13:443–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao B, Wu L, Zhang C, Wang X. Ultrasound biometric features associated with angle closure in fellow eyes of acute primary angle closure after laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:444–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F, Toda Y, et al. A newly developed peripheral anterior chamber depth analysis system: principle, accuracy and reproducibility. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1036–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Asawaphureekorn S. New approaches to visualize the anterior chamber angle. In: Hong C, Yamamoto T, editors. Angle closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kuegler; 2007. p. 101–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nolan WP, Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ, Baasanhu J. YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angleclosure in east Asian eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1255–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gazzard G, Friedman DS, Devereux JG, Chew PT, Seah SK. A prospective ultrasound biomicroscopy evaluation of changes in anterior segment morphology after laser iridotomy in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:630–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, et al. Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1484–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukuhara S, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan – a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Foster PJ, Gaasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Mongolia – a population-based survey in Hovsgol Province, Northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1235–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. The Tajimi Study report 2: prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1661–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bourne RRA, Sukudom P, Foster PJ, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in Thailand: a population based survey in Rom Klao District, Bangkok. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1069–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Salmon JF, Mermoud A, Ivey A, Swanevelder SA, Hoffman M. The prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma and open angle glaucoma in Mamre, Western Cape, South Africa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1263–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Seah SKL, Foster PJ, Chew PT, et al. Incidence of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma in Singapore. An island-wide survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1436–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alsbirk PH. Anterior chamber depth in Greenland Eskimos. I. A population study of variation with age and sex. Acta Ophthalmol. 1974;52:551–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Foster PJ, Alsbirk PH, Baasanhu J, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Anterior chamber depth in Mongolians. Variation with age, sex and method of measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:53–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:186–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:257–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang BM, Liebman JM, Ritch R. Angle closure in younger patients. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:201–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Coffi GA, Durcan FJ, Girkin CA et al. Angle Closure Glaucoma. Chapter 5 in Section 10 of Basic and clinical science course 2008–2009. Am Acad Ophthalmol. 2008;5:126–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Rens GH, Arkell SM, Charlton W, Doesburg W. Primary angleclosure glaucoma among Alaskan Eskimos. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988;70:265–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Arkell SM, Lightman DA, Sommer A, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma among Eskimos of northwest Alaska. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:482–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bourne RR, Sorensen KE, Klauber A, et al. Glaucoma in east greenlandic inuit – a population survey in Ittoqqortoormiit (Scoresbysund). Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:462–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Congdon NG, Quigley HA, Hung PT, et al. Screening techniques for angle-closure glaucoma in rural Taiwan. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74:113–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sim DH, Goh LG, Ho T. Glaucoma pattern amongst the elderly Chinese in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1998;27(6):819–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1710–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic Subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(12):1819–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:1102–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Buhrmann RR, Quigley HA, Barron Y, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in a rural East African population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:40–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rotchford AP, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Zulus: a population-based cross-sectional survey in a rural district in South Africa. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:471–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:209–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bankes JL, Perkins ES, Tsolakis S, Wright JE. Bedford glaucoma survey. Br Med J. 1968;1:791–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bengtsson B. The prevalence of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981;65:46–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1966;50:570–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1499–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Epidemiology of angleclosure glaucoma: prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in the Egna-Neumarket Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:998–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Congdon N, Wang F, Tielsch JM. Issues in the epidemiology and population-based screening of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992;36:411–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Erie JC, Hodge DO, Gray DT. The incidence of primary angle-closure glaucoma in Olmstead County, Minnesota. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:177–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1105–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Congdon NG, Qi Y, Quigley HA, et al. Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese. White and Black populations. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1489–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Aung T, Nolan WP, Machin D, et al. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:527–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Seider MI, Pekmezci M, Han Y, et al. High prevalence of narrow angles among Chinese American glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(8):578–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang D, Qi M, He M, et al. Ethnic difference of the anterior chamber area and volume and its association with angle width. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(6):3139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Peng P, Nguyen H, Nguyen N, et al. Glaucoma and clinical characteristics in Vietnamese Americans. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(8):733–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Seider MI, Agadzi AK, Lee RY, et al. High prevalence of narrow angles among Filipino-American patients. J Glaucoma. 2011;20:139–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Pekmezci M, Vo BT, Lim AK, et al. The characteristics of glaucoma in Japanese Americans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(2):167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Stanley H. Biometry. In: Stanley H, editor. Angle closure glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Marchini G, Pagliarusco A, Toscano A, Tosi R, Brunelli C, Bonomi L. Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2091–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Quigley HA, Silver DM, Friedman DS, et al. Iris cross-sectional area decreases with pupil dilation and its dynamic behavior is a risk factor in angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:173–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Quigley HA. The iris is a sponge: a cause of angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(1):1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Aptel F, Denis P. Optical coherence tomography quantitative analysis of iris volume changes after pharmacologic mydriasis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(1):3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Quigley HA. Angle –closure glaucoma- simpler answers to complex mechanisms: LXVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):657–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fontana SC, Brubaker RF. Volume and depth of the anterior chamber in the normal aging human eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1803–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Forbes M. Indentation gonioscopy and efficacy of iridectomy in angleclosure glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1974;72:488–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Lam DS, Chua JK, Tham CC, Lai JS. Efficacy and safety of immediate anterior chamber paracentesis in the treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lam DS, Lai JS, Tham CC, Chua JK, Poon AS. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty versus conventional systemic medical therapy in treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1591–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lai JS, Tham CC, Chua JK, et al. To compare argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) against systemic medications in treatment of acute primary angle-closure: mid-term results. Eye. 2006;20:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Quaranta L, Bettelli S, et al. Argon laser iridoplasty as primary treatment for acute angle closure glaucoma: a prospective clinical study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 2002;236:16–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Aung T, Tow SL, Yap EY, et al. Trabeculectomy for acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1298–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Lam DS, Leung DY, Tham CC, et al. Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hata H, Yamane S, Hata S, et al. Preliminary outcomes of primary phacoemulsification plus intraocular lens implantation for primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Med Invest. 2008;55(3–4):287–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Husain R, Gazzard G, Aung T, et al. Initial management of acute primary angle closure: a randomized trial comparing phacoemulsification with laser peripheral iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(11):2274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Campbell DG, Vela A. Modern goniosynechialysis for the treatment of synechial angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(9):1052–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Teekhasaenee C, Ritch R. Combined phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis for uncontrolled chronic angle-closure after acute angle closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:669–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Harasymowycz PJ, et al. Phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis in the management of unresponsive primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:186–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, et al. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically controlled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataract. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12):2167–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, et al. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically uncontrolled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):725–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kang SY, Hong S, Won JB, et al. Inaccuracy of intraocular lens power prediction for cataract surgery in angle -closure glaucoma. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(2):206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Joo J, Whang W, Oh T. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle closure glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011;25(6):375–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ritch R, Stegman Z, Liebmann J. Mapstone’s hypothesis confirmed. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Alsbirk PH. Anatomical risk factors in primary angle-closure glaucoma. A ten-year follow-up survey based on limbal and axial anterior chamber depths in a high risk population. Int Ophthalmol. 1992;16:265–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Wilensky JT, Kaufman PI, Frohlichstein D, et al. Follow-up angleclosure glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:338–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Gazzard G, Foster PJ, Friedman DS, Khaw PT, Seah SK. Light to dark physiological variation in irido-trabecular angle width [videotape]. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1357–482.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Lim LS, Husain R, Gazzard G, Seah SK, Aung T. Cataract progression after prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy: potential implications for the prevention of glaucoma blindness. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1355–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Robin AL, Pollack IP. A comparison of neodymium: YAG and argon laser iridotomies. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:1011–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Schwartz GF, Steinmann WC, Spaeth GL, Wilson RP. Surgical and medical management of patients with narrow anterior chamber angles: comparative results. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:108–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Friedman DS, Thomas R, Alsbirk PH, Gazzard G. Detection of primary angle closure glaucoma. In: Weinreb RN, Friedman DS, editors. Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma. The Hague: Kuegler; 2006. p. 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Tarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure glaucoma: the role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54:211–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Nelson L, Maumenee IH. Ectopia lentis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1982;27:143–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Nemet AY, Assia EI, Apple DJ, Barequet IS. Current concepts of ocular manifestations in Marfan syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006;51:561–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Lovisolo CF, Reinstein DZ. Phakic intraocular lenses. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:549–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. von Graefe A. Beitrage zur Palhologie und Therapie des Glaukoms. Arch Ophthalmol. 1869;15:108.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Klein R. Prevention of visual loss from diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:S246–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Gunther JB, Altaweel MM. Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of ocular disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54:372–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Yanoff M. Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: unification of a disease spectrum. Surv Ophthalmol. 1979;24:1–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Hemady RK, Patel A, Blum S, Nirankari VS. Bilateral iridocorneal endothelial syndrome case report and review of the literature. Cornea. 1994;13:368–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Vargas LG, Vroman DT, Soloman KD, Holzer MP, et al. Epithelial downgrowth after clear cornea phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2002;12:2331–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Okhravi N, Odufuwa B, McCluskey P, Lightman S. Scleritis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:351–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Mendelsohn AD, Jampol LM, Schoch D. Secondary angle-closure after central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100:581–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Sodhi A, Leung L, Do DV, Gower EW, Schein OD, Handa JT. Recent trends in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:50–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Levy J, Yagev R, Petrova A, Lifshiz T. Topiramate-induced bilateral angle-closure glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Wiggs JL. Genetic etiologies of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(1):30–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marshall N. Cyrlin MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cyrlin, M.N. (2014). Primary and Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucomas. In: Samples, J., Schacknow, P. (eds) Clinical Glaucoma Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4172-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4172-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4171-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4172-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics