Girls at Risk pp 119-137 | Cite as

A Life-Course Perspective on Girls’ Criminality

  • Frida Andersson
  • Sten Levander
  • Marie Torstensson Levander
Chapter
Part of the Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development book series (ARAD)

Abstract

This chapter explores the female patterning of crime and factors that differentiate between these patterns. The theoretical frame considers the developmental course of criminality and some common developmental pathways or trajectories. This perspective is concerned with identifying factors across people’s lives that account for both stability and change in antisocial behavior and crime. The family, school, and peer groups, expressed in social bonds and social networks, are the dominant sources of social control during childhood and adolescence and although childhood oppositional behavior tends to attenuate these important sources of social control, this is not invariably the case. The chapter has a special focus on a female pattern of crime that has not previously been given so much attention in research, namely an adulthood-onset trajectory. The overall aim is to contribute to a better understanding of factors that contribute to the development of different criminal careers among females by studying individual and social characteristics and how such factors interact to change and shape criminal involvement over two critical developmental phases: early adolescence and the transition into young adulthood for a cohort of Swedish girls.

References

  1. Andersson, F., Levander, S., Svenssou, R., Levander, M. T. (2012). Sex differences in offending trajectories in a swedisk cohort. Journal of Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 22, 108–121.Google Scholar
  2. Bejerot, N. (1975). Drug abuse and drug policy: An epidemiological and methodological study of drug abuse of intravenous type in the stockholm police arrest population 1965–1970 in relation to changes in drug policy. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, C. A., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1985). Girls with attention deficit disorder: A silent minority? A report on behavioral and cognitive characteristics. Pediatrics, 76, 801–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues—the 2002 sutherland award address. Criminology, 41, 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Coid, J. W. (2009). Development of adolescence-limited, late-onset, and persistent offenders from age 8 to age 48. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 150–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, J. L. (2002). Male and female offending trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 159–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helmadotter, A. (1989). Pedagogik för flickor?: Om flickors villkor och könsroller på fritidshem. Stockholm: Socialförvaltningen.Google Scholar
  8. Hirschi, T. 1969. Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hodgins, S., & Janson, C. (2002). Criminality and violence among the mentally disordered: The stockholm metropolitan project. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janson, C. (1984). Project metropolitan: A presentation and progress report. Stockholm: Department of sociology, Stockholm university.Google Scholar
  11. Kratzer, L., & Hodgins, S. (1999). A typology of offenders: A test of moffitt’s theory among males and females from childhood to age 30. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Advancing knowledge about causes in longitudinal studies: Experimental and quasi-experimental methods. In A. M. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 257–279). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loeber, R., & Le Blanc, M. (1990). Towards a developmental criminology. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 12, pp. 375–473). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Moffitt, T. E. (1997). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent offending: A complementary pair of developmental theories. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Advances in criminological theory: Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 11–54). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Life-course-persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 570–598). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2005). Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or a useful statistical fiction? Criminology, 43, 873–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., et al. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 673–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pajer, K. A. (1998). What happens to “bad” girls? A review of the adult outcomes of antisocial adolescent girls. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 862–870.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 359–506). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2007). Key issues in criminal career research: New analyses of the cambridge study in delinquent development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piquero, A. R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2005). Explaining the facts of crime: How the developmental taxonomy replies to farrington’s invitation. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending: Advances in criminology theory (pp. 51–72). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silverthorn, P., & Frick, P. J. (1999). Developmental pathways to antisocial behavior: The delayed-onset pathway in girls. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 101–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Torstensson, M. (1987). Drug abusers in a metropolitan cohort. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  26. van der Geest, V., Blokland, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2009). Delinquent development in a sample of high-risk youth: Shape, content, and predictors of delinquent trajectories from age 12 to 32. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 111–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Dulmen, M. H. M., Goncy, E. A., Vest, A., & Flannery, D. J. (2009). Group-based trajectory modeling of externalizing behavior problems from childhood through adulthood: Exploring discrepancies in the empirical findings. In J. Savage (Ed.), The development of persistent criminality (pp. 288–314). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Latent GOLD 4.0 user’s guide. Belmont, Massachusetts: Statistical Innovations Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Zara, G., & Farrington, D. P. (2009). Childhood and adolescent predictors of late onset criminal careers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 287–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frida Andersson
    • 1
  • Sten Levander
    • 1
  • Marie Torstensson Levander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CriminologyMalmö UniversityMalmoSweden

Personalised recommendations