Advertisement

Sexuality in Families: The (Re-) Creation of Sexual Culture

  • Katherine A. Kuvalanka
  • Judith L. Weiner
  • Stephen T. Russell

Abstract

Family is the context in which meanings of sexuality are initially learned: our understandings of sexuality, as well as our attitudes and values about sexuality, are influenced by our familial experiences in childhood and across the life course. Likewise, our understandings of “family” are grounded in our ideas and beliefs about sexuality. Thus, sexuality is basic to family life; it is a multifaceted concept with intra-psychic, interpersonal, and socio-cultural meanings rooted in family. In this chapter, we review social science literature on sexuality in family life, considering the ways that sexual culture gets created and re-created in families across generations. A family life course perspective provides a guide for understanding the sexual socialization of children, adolescents, and adults in multiple family contexts. We give explicit attention to gender, culture, class, and race in our synthesis of prior work, and consider social learning theory, symbolic interaction, and queer theory as important contributors in recent decades to understanding sexuality in families. Our goal is to describe a “positive” vision of sexuality for families—a “sex education” that embraces sexuality as a natural, healthy dimension of personal development and family relationships across the life span.

Keywords

Sexual Desire Sexual Identity Sexual Attitude Social Learning Theory Sexual Script 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Katherine R. Allen who generously provided helpful feedback on an early outline of this chapter.

References

  1. Allen, K. R. (2009). Keeping the feminist in our teaching: Daring to make a difference. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 351–359). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. M., Bobrow, D., Wolfe, M., & Mikach, S. (1995). Sexual orientation of adult sons of gay fathers. Developmental Psychology, 31, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J. (2003). Sexual development in childhood. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, M. (2005). This is my partner, and this is my…partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bem, S. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bengtson, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 469–499). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkowitz, D. (2009). Theorizing lesbian and gay parenting: Past, present, and future scholarship. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bretschneider, J., & McCoy, N. (1988). Sexual interest and behavior in the health of 80–102 year-olds. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgess, E. O. (2004). Sexuality in midlife and later life couples. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 437–454). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byers, E., Sears, H., & Weaver, A. (2008). Parents’ reports of sexual communication with children in kindergarten to grade 8. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 70, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cahill, S. E. (1983). Reexamining the acquisition of sex roles: A social interactionist approach. Sex Roles, 9, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carr, D. (2004). The desire to date and remarry among older widows and widowers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 1051–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Christopher, F. S. (2001). To dance the dance: A symbolic interactional explanation of premarital sexuality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Christopher, F. S., & Kisler, T. S. (2004). Exploring marital sexuality: Peeking inside the bedroom and discovering what we don’t know—But should! In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 371–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Christopher, F. S., Madura, M., & Weaver, L. (1998). Premarital sexual aggressors: A multivariate analysis of social, relational, and individual variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, P. H. (2005). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeLamater, J. (1987a). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality: Theories and research (pp. 127–139). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  27. DeLamater, J. (1987b). A sociological perspective. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 237–256). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  28. DeLamater, J., & Friedrich, W. N. (2002). Human sexual development. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. DeLamater, J., & Hyde, J. S. (2004). Conceptual and theoretical issues in studying sexuality in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 7–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Diamond, L. M., Savin-Williams, R. C., & Dube, E. M. (1999). Sex, dating, passionate friendships, and romance. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 175–210). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dreby, J. (2006). Honor and virtue: Mexican parenting in the transnational context. Gender and Society, 20, 32–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dworkin, S., & O’Sullivan, L. (2007). “It’s less work for us and it shows us she has good taste”: Masculinity, sexual initiation, and contemporary sexual scripts. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. 105–121). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Elder, G. H., Jr., & Shanahan, M. J. (2006). The life course and human development. In R. E. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development (The handbook of child psychology 6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 665–715). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Epstein, S. (1996). A queer encounter: Sociology and the study of sexuality. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 145–168). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Fine, M. A., Demo, D. H., & Allen, K. A. (2000). Family diversity in the 21st century: Implications for research, policy, and practice. In D. H. Demo, K. A. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 440–448). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Fisher, T. D. (2004). Family foundations of sexuality. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 385–409). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  39. Franklin, C., & Corcoran, J. (2000). Parenting adolescent pregnancy: A review of programs and practices. Social Work, 24(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gabb, J. (2004). Sexuality education: How children of lesbian mothers “learn” about sex/uality. Sex Education, 4(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  42. Gecas, V., & Libby, R. (1976). Sexual behavior as symbolic interaction. Journal of Sex Research, 12, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldberg, A. E. (2007). (How) does it make a difference? Perspectives of adults with lesbian, gay, and bisexual parents. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Lesbian and gay parents and their children: Research on the family life cycle. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gordon, M. K. (2008). Media contributions to African American girls’ focus on beauty and appearance: Exploring the consequences of sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gottman, J. S. (1990). Children of gay and lesbian parents. In F. W. Bozett & M. B. Sussman (Eds.), Homosexuality and family relations (pp. 177–196). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  47. Green, R., Mandel, J. B., Hotvedt, M. E., Gray, J., & Smith, L. (1986). Lesbian mothers and their children: A comparison with solo parent heterosexual mothers and their children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gudykunst, W. B. (1998). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Harris, A. C. (2010). Sex, stigma, and the Holy Ghost: The Black Church and the construction of AIDS in New York City. Journal of African American Studies, 14, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Heisler, J. M. (2005). Family communication about sex: Parents and college-aged offspring recall discussion topics, satisfaction, and parent involvement. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Sex and romantic love: Connects and disconnects. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 159–182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Herdt, G., & Koff, B. (2001). Something to tell you: The road families travel when a child is gay. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Herek, G. M. (1992). The social context of hate crimes: Notes on cultural heterosexism. In G. M. Herek & K. Berrill (Eds.), Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 89–104). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Hogben, M., & Byrne, D. (1998). Using social learning theory to explain individual differences in sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jaccard, J., Dittus, P., & Gordon, V. (2000). Parent-teen communication about premarital sex: Factors associated with the extent of communication. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(2), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kenrick, D. T., & Trost, M. R. (1987). A biosocial theory of heterosexual relationships. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality (pp. 59–100). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kim, J. L. (2009). Asian American women’s retrospective reports of their sexual socialization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(3), 334–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kimmel, M. (2007). John Gagnon and the sexual self. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. vii–xv). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kingsberg, S. A. (2002). The impact of aging on sexual functioning in women and their partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kitzinger, C. (2001). Sexualities. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 272–285). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Kuvalanka, K., & Goldberg, A. (2009). “Second generation” voices: Queer youth with lesbian/bisexual mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 904–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 278–290). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Lam, A. G., Russell, S. T., & Leong, S. J. (2008). Maternal correlates of noncoital sexual behavior: Examining a nationally representative sample of Asian and White American adolescents who have not had sex. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (1998). Egalitarian daters/traditionalist dates. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (2005). The social organization of sexuality. In J. K. Davidson & N. B. Moore (Eds.), Speaking of sexuality: Interdisciplinary readings (pp. 29–39). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  69. Lefkowitz, E., & Espinosa-Hernandez, G. (2007). Sex-related communication with mothers and close friends during the transition to university. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lefkowitz, E., Romo, L., Corona, R., Au, T., & Sigman, M. (2000). How Latino American and European American adolescents discuss conflicts, sexuality, and AIDS with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lefkowitz, E. S., & Stoppa, T. M. (2006). Positive sexual communication and socialization in the parent-adolescent context. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 112, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Longmore, M. A. (1998). Symbolic interactionism and the study of sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mahay, J., Laumann, E. O., & Michaels, S. (2001). Race, gender, and class in sexual scripts. In E. O. Laumann & R. T. Michael (Eds.), Sex, love, and health in America (pp. 197–238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Marsiglio, W., & Donnelly, D. (1991). Sexual relations in later life: A national study of married persons. Journal of Gerontology, 46, S338–S344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Martin, K. A. (2009). Normalizing heterosexuality: Mothers’ assumptions, talk, and strategies with young children. American Sociological Review, 74, 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Matthias, R. E., Lubben, J. E., Atchison, K. A., & Schweitzer, S. O. (1997). Sexual activity and satisfaction among very old adults: Results from a community-dwelling Medicare population survey. The Gerontologist, 37, 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  78. Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Los Angeles: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  79. Mischel, W. (1966). A social-learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mitchell, V. (1998). The birds, the bees…and the sperm banks: How lesbian mothers talk with their children about sex and reproduction. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(3), 400–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Moore, A. J., & Stratton, D. C. (2001). Resilient widowers: Older men speak for themselves. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Morrow, D. F. (2004). Social work practice with gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender adolescents. Families in Society, 85, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nangle, D. W., & Hansen, D. J. (1998). Adolescent heterosocial competence revisited: Implications of an extended conceptualization for the prevention of high-risk sexual interactions. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 431–446.Google Scholar
  85. O’Keefe, M., & Treister, L. (1998). Victims of dating violence among high school students: Are the predictors different for males and females? Violence Against Women, 4(2), 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Oliver, M., & Hyde, J. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ortiz-Torres, B., Williams, S., & Ehrhardt, A. (2003). Urban women’s gender scripts: Implications for HIV prevention. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. O’Sullivan, L. F. (2003). Methodological issues associated with studies of child sexual behavior. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Sexual development in childhood (pp. 23–33). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Oswald, R. F., Blume, L. B., & Marks, S. R. (2005). Decentering heteronormativity: A model for family studies. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory & research (pp. 143–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  90. Oswald, R. F., Kuvalanka, K. A., Blume, L., & Berkowitz, D. (2009). Queering “the family”. In S. Lloyd, A. Few, & K. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 43–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  92. Paul, J. P., Catania, J., Pollack, L., & Stall, R. (2001). Understanding childhood sexual abuse as a predictor of sexual risk-taking among men who have sex with men: The Urban Men’s Health Study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 557–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Peplau, L. A., Fingerhut, A., & Beals, K. P. (2004). Sexuality in the relationships of lesbians and gay men. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 349–369). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  94. Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex difference: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1699–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Plummer, K. (2007). Queers, bodies, and postmodern sexualities: A note on revisiting the “sexual” in symbolic interactionism. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. 16–30). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Powlishta, K. K., Sen, M. G., Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). From infancy through middle childhood: The role of cognitive and social factors in becoming gendered. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 116–132). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  97. Rabun, C., & Oswald, R. F. (2009). Upholding and expanding the normal family: Future fatherhood through the eyes of gay male emerging adults. Fathering, 7(3), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Raffaelli, M., Bogenschneider, K., & Flood, M. (1998). Parent-teen communications about sexual topics. Journal of Family Issues, 19(3), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Raffaelli, M., & Green, S. (2003). Parent-adolescent communication about sex: Retrospective reports by Latino college students. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 65(2), 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Raffaelli, M., & Ontai, L. (2001). “She’s 16 years old and there’s boys calling over to the house”: An exploratory study of sexual socialization in Latino families. Health and Sexuality, 3(3), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Reid, P. T., & Bing, V. M. (2000). Sexual roles of girls and women: An ethnocultural lifespan perspective. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 141–166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rhimes, S. (Writer), Bans, J. (Writer), & Verica, T. (Director). (2009). Tainted obligation [Television series episode]. In S. Rhimes (Executive producer), Grey’s anatomy. Los Angeles: ABC.Google Scholar
  103. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5, 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rotter, J. B. (1982). The development and applications of social learning theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  107. Russell, S. T. (2005). Conceptualizing positive adolescent sexuality development. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2(3), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rust, P. C. (2001). Two many and not enough: The meanings of bisexual identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 32–68.Google Scholar
  109. Ryan, C., Huebner, D., Diaz, R. M., & Sanches, J. (2009). Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in White and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. Pediatrics, 123(1), 346–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sandfort, T. G. M., & Rademakers, J. (2000). Childhood sexuality: Normal sexual behavior and development. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  111. Santelli, J., Ott, M. A., Lyon, M., Rogers, J., Summers, D., & Schleifer, R. (2006). Abstinence and abstinence-only education: A review of U.S. policies and programs. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Savin-Williams, R. C. (1996). Self-labeling and disclosure among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. In J. Laird & R. J. Green (Eds.), Lesbians and gays in couples and families (pp. 153–182). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  113. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2004). Sex. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 189–231). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  114. Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11, 621–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Are men really more ‘oriented’ toward short-term mating than women? A critical review of theory and research. Psychology, Evolution, & Gender, 3, 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Seal, D., & Ehrhardt, A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sears, J. T. (1992). Educators, homosexuality, and homosexual students: Are personal feelings related to professional beliefs? In K. M. Harbeck (Ed.), Coming out of the classroom closet: Gay and lesbian students, teachers, and curricula (pp. 29–79). Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park.Google Scholar
  118. Shtarkshall, R. A., Santelli, J. S., & Hirsch, J. S. (2007). Sex education and sexual socialization: Roles for educators and parents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Smiler, A. P., Ward, L. M., Caruthers, A., & Merriwether, A. (2005). Pleasure, empowerment, and love: Factors associated with a positive first coitus. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2(3), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sprecher, S., Barbee, A., & Schwartz, P. (1995). “Was it good for you, too?”: Gender differences in first sexual intercourse experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sprecher, S., Harris, G., & Meyers, A. (2008). Perceptions of sources of sex education and targets of sex communication: Sociodemographic and cohort effects. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Stern, M., & Karraker, K. H. (1989). Sex stereotyping of infants: A review of gender labeling studies. Sex Roles, 20, 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Stotzer, R. L. (2009). Straight allies: Supportive attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in a college sample. Sex Roles, 60, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sutfin, E. L., Fulcher, M., Bowles, R. P., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). How lesbian and heterosexual parents convey attitudes about gender to their children: The role of gendered environments. Sex Roles, 58, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sutton, M. J., Brown, J., Wilson, K. M., & Klein, J. D. (2002). Shaking the tree of knowledge for forbidden fruit: Where adolescents learn about sexuality and contraception. In J. Brown, J. R. Steele, & K. Walsh-Childers (Eds.), Sexual teens, sexual media (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  127. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Tasker, F. L., & Golombok, S. (1997). Growing up in a lesbian family: Effects on child development. London: Guilford.Google Scholar
  129. Taylor, J. M., Gilligan, C., & Sullivan, A. M. (1995). Between voice and silence: Women and girls, race and relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  130. Tolman, D. L. (1996). Adolescent girls’ sexuality: Debunking the myth of the urban girl. In B. J. R. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 255–271). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  131. Tolman, D. L., & Diamond, L. M. (2001). Desegregating sexuality research: Cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 33–74.Google Scholar
  132. Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Porche, M. V. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Townsend, T. G. (2008). Protecting our daughters: Intersection of race, class, and gender in African American mothers’ socialization of their daughters’ heterosexuality. Sex Roles, 59, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Troost, K. M., & Filsinger, E. (1993). Emerging biosocial perspectives on the family. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 677–710). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2004). Defense of Marriage Act: Update to prior report (GAO-04-353R). Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.gao.gov
  136. Wainright, J. L., Russell, S. T., & Patterson, C. J. (2004). Psychosocial adjustment, school outcomes, and romantic relationships of adolescents with same-sex parents. Child Development, 75, 1886–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Weis, D. L. (1998). The state of sexual theory. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Willetts, M. C., Sprecher, S., & Beck, F. D. (2004). Overview of sexual practices and attitudes within relational contexts. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 57–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  140. Williams, T., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (2005). Peer victimization, social support, and psychological adjustment of sexual minority adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wright, P. J. (2009a). Father-child sexual communication in the United States: A review and synthesis. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wright, P. J. (2009b). Sexual socialization messages in mainstream entertainment mass media: A review and synthesis. Sexuality & Culture, 13, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York  2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine A. Kuvalanka
    • 1
  • Judith L. Weiner
    • 2
  • Stephen T. Russell
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Family Studies and Social WorkMiami UniversityOxfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of CommunicationMiami UniversityOxfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Family Studies and Human Development, Frances McClelland Institute for Children, Youth, and FamiliesThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations