# Mass, Special Relativity and the Equivalence Principle

• Constantinos G. Vayenas
• Stamatios N.-A. Souentie
Chapter

## Abstract

The equivalence principle states that inertial mass of a particle, i.e. the ratio of force and acceleration, is equal to the gravitational mass, i.e. equal to the quantity responsible for the gravitational force. Special relativity dictates that this inertial or gravitational mass of a particle equals γ3 m o where m o is the rest mass of the particle and $$\gamma (= {(1 -{{ v}}^{2}/{c}^{2})}^{-1/2})$$ is the Lorentz factor. The latter is unbound when the particle velocity relative to a laboratory observer approaches the speed of light c. This is a well-known result for linear motions and, using instantaneous frames of reference, is shown here to be valid also for arbitrary particle motion. Thus it is the gravitational mass γ3 m o, rather than the relativistic mass, γm o, defined from Einstein’s famous E = γm o c 2 which must be used in Newton’s gravitational law. This difference is totally negligible for non-relativistic velocities, e.g. v < 0. 1c, but can become quite important when v approaches c. Thus special relativity coupled with Newton’s gravitational law dictates that the gravitational attraction becomes much stronger under relativistic conditions than that expected from the simple Newton’s gravitational law using the rest, m o, or relativistic mass, γm o of the particles involved. This is consistent with the expectation, based on general relativity, that Newton’s gravitational law when used with rest or the relativistic masses, may not be valid under highly relativistic conditions. The implications are quite significant for fast subatomic particles.

### Keywords

Mercury Electromagnetism

### References

1. 1.
Roll PG, Krotkov R, Dicke RG (1964) The equivalence of inertial and passive gravitational mass. Annals of Physics 26(3):442–517
2. 2.
Gundlach JH, Merkowitz SM (2000) Measurement of Newton’s constant using a torsion balance with angular acceleration feedback. Phys Rev Lett 85(14):2869–2872
3. 3.
Hoyle CD et al (2001) Sub-millimeter tests of the gravitational Inverse-Square Law: a search for “Large” extra dimensions. Phys Rev Lett 86:1418–1421
4. 4.
Long JC, Chan HW, Churnside AB, Gulbis EA, Varney MCM, Price JC (2003) Upper limits to submillimetre-range forces from extra space-time dimensions. Nature 421:922–925
5. 5.
Freund J (2008) Special relativity for beginners. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
6. 6.
French AP (1968) Special relativity. W. W. Norton and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
7. 7.
Einstein A (1952) Relativity: the special and the general theory, 15th edn. Crown, New YorkGoogle Scholar
8. 8.
Misner CW, Thorne KS, Wheeler JA (1973) Gravitation. W.H. Freeman, San FransiscoGoogle Scholar
9. 9.
Hawking SW, Ellis GFR (2006) The large scale structure of space-time, 20th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
10. 10.
Misner CW, Thorne KS, Zurek WH (2009) John Wheeler, relativity, and quantum information. Phys Today 62(4):40–46
11. 11.
Moffat JW (2006) Scalar-tensor-vector gravity theory. J Cosmology Astroparticle Phys 3:1–18
12. 12.
Milgrom M (2009) Bimetric MOND gravity. Phys Rev D 80(12). arXiv:0912.0790Google Scholar
13. 13.
Einstein A (1917) Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, gemeinverständlich, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
14. 14.
Dyson FW, Eddington AS, Davidson C (1920) A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun’s gravitational field, from observations made at the total Eclipse of May 29, 1919. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond A 220:291–333
15. 15.
Will CM (1993) Theory and experiment in gravitational physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. 16.
Will CM (2004) The conformation between general relativity and experiment. Pramana J Phys 63(4):731–740
17. 17.
Schiller S et al (2009) Einstein gravity explorer-a medium-class fundamental physics mission. Exp Astronom 23:573–610; 220(571–581):291–333Google Scholar
18. 18.
Wilhelm K, Dwivedi BN (2011) An explanation of the Pioneer anomaly involving accelerated atomic clocks. Astrophys SpaceSci Trans 7:487–494
19. 19.
Ashok D (2011) Lectures on gravitation. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
20. 20.
Amelino-Camelia G, Ellis J, Mavromatos NE, Nanopoulos DV, Sarkar S (1998) Tests of quantum gravity from observations of γ-ray bursts. Nature 393:763
21. 21.
Amelino-Camelia G (2001) A phenomenological description of space-time noise in quantum gravity. Nature 410:1065–1067
22. 22.
Rovelli C (2004) Quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge