Force Unification: Is the Strong Force Simply Gravity?

  • Constantinos G. Vayenas
  • Stamatios N.-A. Souentie
Chapter

Abstract

Is the strong force simply relativistic gravity? The very good, semiquantitative agreement shown in Table 1.1 and in Chaps. 7–10 between experiment and the Bohr-type rotating neutrino model described in Chap. 6 and summarized in Table 1.1 or 7.1 provides strong support to a positive answer. This is of course at the beginning quite counterintuitive since we have always been taught that strong force and gravity are the strongest and weakest forces, respectively, in nature. Their coupling constants differ by some forty to sixty orders of magnitude, and it is generally but rather vaguely anticipated that these coupling constants will merge, together with the electrostatic coupling constant, at distances of the order of the Planck length (∼10−35 m) and energies of the order of the Planck mass energy (∼1019 GeV ). A quantitative examination of the coupling constant behavior of relativistic gravity, assisted by the rotating neutrino hadron model, may thus provide useful and perhaps conclusive information.

References

  1. 1.
    Griffiths D (2008) Introduction to elementary particles, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Povh B, Rith K, Scholz Ch, Zetsche F (2006) Particles and nuclei: an introduction to the physical concepts, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cottingham WN, Greenwood DA (2001) An introduction to nuclear physics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilczek FA (2004) Asymptotic freedom: from paradox to paradigm. The Nobel Prize in Physics. (http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/2004/publi.html)
  5. 5.
    Ahluwalia DV (1999) Testing time for theories. Nature 398:199–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brumfiel G (2011) Beautiful theory collides with smashing particle data. Nature 471:13–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weinberg S (1993) Dreams of a final theory: the search for the fundamental laws of nature. Cox & Wyman, London. ISBN 0-09-922391-0Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wheeler JA (1955) Phys Rev 97(2):511–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Misner CW, Thorne KS, Zurek WH (2009) John Wheeler, relativity, and quantum information. Phys Today 62(4):40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hehl FH, Šijački Dj (1980) Towards a unified gauge theory of gravitational and strong interactions. Gen Relativ Grav 12(1):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Recami E, Zanchin VT (1994) The strong coupling constant: its theoretical derivation from a geometric approach to hadron structure. Found Phys Lett 7:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sivaram C, Sinha K (1977) Strong gravity, black holes, and hadrons. Phys Rev D 16(6), 1975–1978; references thereinGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hadley MJ (2007) Classical dark matter. arXiv:gr-qc/0701100v1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantinos G. Vayenas
    • 1
  • Stamatios N.-A. Souentie
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations