Abstract
Social scientists are increasingly using surveys to collect data on behaviors, knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and opinions from various population of interest. Most of the time, researchers are aware of survey limits to provide population estimates due to sampling error; however, social researchers are less aware of survey limits due to nonsampling errors. This chapter discusses the most defining characteristics of sampling and nonsampling errors in surveys. In particular, the chapter uses the Total Survey Error (TSE) approach as a way of helping social scientists to think comprehensively about the impact of different sources of error on survey estimates. The TSE is a valuable survey methodology theoretical framework which conceives the concept of survey error as a function of four factors: sampling error, coverage error, nonresponse error, and measurement error. This chapter emphasizes the importance of thinking inclusively about survey errors and data quality, with the ultimate purpose of minimizing the impact of error sources on survey estimates.
The author is grateful to NORC Center for Excellence in Survey Research (CESR) for the grant support provided to complete this chapter. All errors and omissions, of course, remain the sole responsibility of the author.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AAPOR. (2009). Standard definitions. Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2009. Available from http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Standard_Definitions1&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=1814
Biemer, P. P. (2010). Total survey error: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817.
Biemer, P. P., & Lyberg, L. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. Hoboken: Wiley.
de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., Dillman, D. A., & European Association of Methodology. (2008). International handbook of survey methodology, EAM book series. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849.
Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley.
Groves, R. M. (2004). Survey methodology, Wiley series in survey methodology. Hoboken: Wiley.
Lessler, J. T., & William D. K. (1992). Nonsampling error in surveys, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley.
Neyman, J. (1934). On the two different aspects of the representative method: The method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97(4), 558–625.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bautista, R. (2012). An Overlooked Approach in Survey Research: Total Survey Error . In: Gideon, L. (eds) Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3875-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3876-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)