Skip to main content

Second Critique of Buchman and Chalfin’s Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ICU Resource Allocation in the New Millennium

Abstract

Doctors Buchman and Chalfin are to be commended for their emphasis on health education as a means of encouraging adoption of healthy behaviors, and thereby reducing the toll—physical, emotional, and economic—of coronary artery disease, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other similar chronic illnesses. As they state “To the extent that prevention or even delay of the onset of a chronic illness corresponds to sustained health, prevention of disease is desirable from both personal and societal perspectives.” However, even were the populous to modify its health behaviors, thereby achieving what has been termed “compressed morbidity” [1], people will still get sick and be injured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Old J. Hospice care and end-of-life issues: paradigm shifts. American Academy of Family Physicians Scientific Assembly. [Online] September 2010 [Cited: 4 June 2011]. http://www.aafp.org/online/etc/medialib/aafp_org/documents/cme/courses/conf/assembly/2010handouts/136.Par.0001.File.tmp/136-137.pdf.

  2. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical ethics 5th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz A, Bergus G. Medical decision making: a physician’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Emanuel LL, von Gunten CF, Ferris FD, Hauser JM, editors. The education in palliative and end-of-life care (EPEC) curriculum. Chicago: The EPEC Project; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Community Medical Centers. Policy on medically ineffective interventions (futility). Fresno: s.n.; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shaner DM. Up in the air - suspending ethical medical practice. N Eng J Med. [Online] 30 Nov 2010. [Cited: 5 June 2011.] http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1006331#t=articl.

  7. Short S. Too much for that: a social critique of medical technology in late modernity. Australian Review of Public Affairs. [Online] November 2010. [Cited: 5 June 2011.] http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2010/11/short.html.

  8. Clark PA. Medical futility: legal and ethical analysis. Am Med Assoc J Ethics: virtualmentor.org. [Online] May 2007. http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2007/05/msoc1-0705.html.

  9. Fletcher JC, Lombardo PA, Marshall MF, Miller FG, editors. Introduction to clinical ethics 2nd edition. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Council on Judicial and Ethical Affairs. Opinion 2.035 - futile care. Am Med Assoc. [Online] June 1994. [Cited: 5 June 2011.] http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion2035.page?

  11. Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Policy on medical futility and end-of-life care. Boston : s.n.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knapp van Bogaert D, Ogunbanjo GA. The principle of proportionality: foregoing/withdrawing life support. SA Fam Pract. [Online] 2005. [Cited: 5 June 2011.] www.safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/download/295/295.

  13. Council on Judicial and Ethical Affairs. Opinion 2.037 - medical futility in end-of-life care. Am Med Association. [Online] June 1997. [Cited: 5 June 2011.] http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion2037.page?

  14. Anderson JS. Managing patients or families who demand medically futile care. [Online] [Cited: 5 June 2011.] http://www.fammed.ouhsc.edu/Palliative-Care/documents/Medically%20Futile%20Care.ppt.

  15. State of California. California probate code. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html . [Online].

  16. Peabody, FW. The care of the patient. JAMA Classics. [Online] 19 March 1927. [Cited: 5 June 2011.] http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/suppl/2009/04/16/301.16.1710.DC1/JAMAclassics042209.pdf.

  17. Cure sometimes, treat often, comfort always. A Country Doctor Writes. [Online] 14 September 2010. [Cited: 5 June 2011.] http://acountrydoctorwrites.wordpress.com/2010/09/14/cure-sometimes-treat-often-comfort-always/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Barkley Burnett M.D., Ed.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burnett, L.B. (2013). Second Critique of Buchman and Chalfin’s Analysis. In: Crippen, D. (eds) ICU Resource Allocation in the New Millennium. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3866-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3866-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3865-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3866-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics