Skip to main content

Action Evaluation in Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

Abstract

This section of the book beginning with this chapter, growing quite literally out of the work presented in the first half, is about how to “help good people do good work together better.” Moreover, it’s also about ensuring that good work of good people is sustainable. While as the previous chapters have illustrated ARIA Conflict Engagement work has been quite successful around the world in helping disputants locked in deep identity-based conflict surface differences (Antagonism), take each other’s perspectives (Resonance) and invent creative ways forward (Invention), it has been less successful in helping them sustain and implement this work (Action). Action Evaluation evolved as a way to systematically define, promote and assess success in order to “increase the odds” that good work would be sustained.

With extensive editorial assistance by Sarah Haney

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To see how the system works, please try it out by going to www.ariac3.com and putting in the password “practice.” Then follow the simple prompts. If you select “return to my email,” you can get a copy of your own responses.

References

  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, C., & Chrobot-mason, D. (2011). Boundary spanning leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (2001). Action evaluation in theory and practice. Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies. pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1997). Action Evaluation and Conflict Resolution in Theory and Practice. Mediation Quarterly, 15: 2. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (2003). Action evaluation in theory and practice. Beyond Intractability.org. http://www.beyondintractability.org/bi-essay/action-evaluation.

  • Rothman, J., & Friedman, V. (2002). Action evaluation for conflict management organizations and projects. In J. Davies & E. Kaufman (Eds.), Second track/citizen’s diplomacy: Concepts and techniques for conflict transformation (pp. 285–298). New York: Rowan and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J., & Friedman, V. (2001). Action evaluation for knowledge creation in social-education programs. In S. Sankaran, B. Dick, R. Passfield, & P. Swepson (Eds.), Effective change management using action learning and action research (pp. 57–65). Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. (1961). Small groups and political behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

General Literature on Action Evaluation: Book Chapters

  • Eck, J., & Rothman, J. (2006). Police community conflict and crime prevention in Cincinnati, Ohio: The collaborative agreement. In J. Bailey (Ed.), Public security and police reform in the Americas (pp. 225–244). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1999). Articulating goals and monitoring progress in a Cyprus conflict resolution training workshop. In M. Ross & J. Rothman (Eds.), Theory and practice in ethnic conflict management: Theorizing success and failure (pp. 176–194). London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1997). Action: Setting joint agendas. In J. Rothman (Ed.), Resolving identity-based conflict in nations, organizations and communities (pp. 71–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Journal Articles

  • Friedman, V., Rothman, J., & Withers, B. (2006). The power of why: Engaging the goal paradox in program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J., & Land, R. (2004). Cincinnati police-community relations collaborative. Criminal Justice, 18(4), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (2003). Improving police-community relations in Cincinnati: A collaborative approach. AC Resolution, 3(1), 25–27. Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J., & Soderquist, C. (2002). From riots to resolution: Engaging conflict for reconciliation. In The systems thinker. Pegasus Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1997). Action-Evaluation and conflict resolution: In theory and practice. Mediation Quarterly, 15(2), 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Web-Based Publications

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Rothman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rothman, J. (2012). Action Evaluation in Theory and Practice. In: Rothman, J. (eds) From Identity-Based Conflict to Identity-Based Cooperation. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3679-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics