Skip to main content

It’s the End of the World as We Know It: The Advance of Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective

Abstract

There has been little meaningful action to mitigate and adapt to climate change, even though it is perhaps the greatest threat that humanity has ever faced. Many assume that meaningful action will only occur once the very harmful effects of climate change become apparent. This chapter draws on the major crime theories to make a rather different argument—that the advance of climate change will reduce rather than increase the likelihood of meaningful action. The chapter first provides brief overviews of the effects of climate change, the inadequate response to such change, and the reasons for this inadequate response. It then discusses certain of the consequences of climate change from a criminological perspective, consequences such as increased strain, reduced control, and greater social conflict. These consequences are said to reduce the ability and willingness of individuals and groups to take meaningful action on climate change. The chapter concludes by describing an alternative, more hopeful narrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Oxford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2009). Juvenile delinquency: Causes and control. Oxford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2011). Dire forecast: A theoretical model of the impact of climate change on crime. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 21–42. doi:10.1177/1362480611416843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H. D., & Decker, S. H. (2010). Criminology and public policy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 40, 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H., Gleditsch, N. P., & Theisen, O. M. (2008). Implications of climate change for armed conflict. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, H. (2010). The weather of the future. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., & Agnew, R. (2011). Criminological theory: Past to present. Oxford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A., & Preisendorfer. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwon, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation. Sociological Quarterly, 49, 529–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Humanitarian Forum. (2009). The anatomy of a silent crisis. Copenhagen: Global Humanitarian Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gockeritz, S., Schultz, P. W., Rendon, T., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2010). Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 514–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, A. (2009). Our choice. Emmaus, PA: Rodale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, S. F. (2010). Public opinion about the environment: Notable shifts in recent years. http://www.environmentaltrends.org/single/article/public-opinion-about-the-environment-notable-shifts-in-recent-years.html.

  • Henson, R. (2011). The rough guide to climate change. London: Rough Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertsgaard, M. (2011). Hot: Living through the next fifty years on earth. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, O. (2004). Some psychological correlates of environmentally responsible behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmannskog, V. O. (2008). Future floods of refugees. Oslo: Norwegian Refugee Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, T. (2002). The psychology of environmentally sustainable behavior. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. (2009). Managing the health effects of climate change. Lancet, 373, 1693–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. J., Burns, R. G., & Stretesky, P. B. (2010). Global warming and state-corporate crime: The politicalization of global warming under the Bush administration. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 54, 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture, and Society, 27, 100–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, B. (2010). Eaarth: Making a life on a tough new planet. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam. (2009). Suffering the science: Climate change, people, and poverty, Oxfam Briefing Paper 130. Copenhagen: Oxfam International. http://www.oxfam.org.

  • Page, L. A., & Howard, L. M. (2010). The impact of climate change on mental health. Psychological Medicine, 40, 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, B. C., & Roberts, J. T. (2008). Inequality and the global climate regime: Breaking the North-South impasse. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21, 621–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchen, M. (2010). What shapes public reactions to climate change? Overview of research and policy implications. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10, 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, C., Jordan, L., & Salehyan, I. (2008). Assessing the impact of climate change on migration and conflict. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautter, J. A., Czap, N. V., Kruse, C., & Lynne, G. D. (2011). Farmers’ decisions regarding carbon sequestration: A metaeconomic view. Society and Natural Resources, 24, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S., & Weisburd, D. (2010). The criminology of white-collar crime. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1981). The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Vivekananda, J. (2007). A climate of conflict. London: International Alert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacoli, C. (2009). Crisis or adaptation? Migration and climate change in a context of high mobility. Environment and Urbanization, 21, 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs-Santa, A. (2007). Barriers to environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 14, 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K. J. (2007). From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 503–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute. (2010). 2010 State of the world: Transforming cultures. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68, 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Agnew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agnew, R. (2012). It’s the End of the World as We Know It: The Advance of Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective. In: White, R. (eds) Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3640-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics