The Benefits and Costs of Authorizing Riverboat Gambling

  • Thomas L. Saaty
  • Luis G. Vargas
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 175)


On 26 Nov. 1990, six months after the study on which this chapter is based was undertaken, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives rejected a bill to legalize riverboat gambling by a vote of 118-81.


Analytical Hierarchy Process Organize Crime Gambling Activity Allegheny County Illegal Gambling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Clymer PI (1991) Making waves: riverboat gambling would prompt other betting. Harrisburg Patriot News, 13 May 1991Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo D (1990) Master salesman puts a new spin on river business. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 28 May 1990Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Legalization of Gambling in Pennsylvania: A Study (1984) League of women voters of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pagano C (1987) Superintendent of New Jersey state police, Impact of legalized gambling on illegal gambling in New Jersey, 16 Oct 1987Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schroeder M (1990) Talk About a Riverboat Gambler, Business Week, 72, 23 July 1990Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shehan A (1990) Gateway fleet charts cautious course on gambling, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, C5, 22 Nov 1990Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheehan A (1990) Riverboat gambling seen bonanza, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 4, 14 May 1990Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siler C (1990) Why are Las Vegas and Atlantic City yawning? Forbes, 140, 30 April 1990Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolf D (1991) Riverboat gambling bill founders, The Pittsburgh Press, B3, 29 May 1991Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Katz Graduate School of Business and College of Business AdministrationUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations