Critical Theory and the Mythology of Learning with Technology

Chapter
Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS, volume 5)

Abstract

Critical theory designates a philosophy and research methodology that focuses on the interrelated issues of technology, politics, and social change. Despite its emphasis on technology, critical theory arguably remains underutilized in areas of practical research that lie at the confluence of social, political, and technological concerns. This chapter addresses that situation by first describing the methodology of ideology critique. This chapter shows how critical theory can be used to articulate a critique or “de-mystify” three particular truths or myths widespread in the field of educational technology. These are claims that (1) we live in a “knowledge economy,” (2) this technology is changing the educational requirements of a “net generation,” and (3) social and institutional change is motivated by a number of fixed “laws” of progress in computer technology. These claims are shown to simplify or obscure a complex social reality that is constituted by different and conflicting forms of knowledge.

Keywords

Income Coherence Stratification Posit Nash 

References

  1. Adorno, T. (1981a). Prisms: Essays in cultural criticism and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. (1981b). Minima Moralia: Reflections from a damaged life. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (1999). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. (Special Anniversary Edition). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. H. Arendt (Ed.). New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Bottomore, T. (1983). A dictionary of marxist thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online engineering education: Learning anywhere, anytime. Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks, 9,1, http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v9n1/v9n1_bourne_member.asp.Google Scholar
  10. Brzezinski, Z. (1970). Between two ages: America’s role in the technetronic era. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  11. Buckingham, D. (2006). Is there a digital generation? In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people and new media. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Bull, G., Garofalo, J., and Harris, J. (2002) Grand Challenges: Preparing for the Technological Tipping Point. Learning & Leading with Technology 29 May 2002. Accessed April 26, 2008, from: http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/LL/LLIssues/Volume_29_2001_2002_/May15/Bonus_Feature_Grand_Challenges_Vignettes.htm.
  13. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  14. Chambers, J. (1999). Convergence for Business Education and Entertainment Key Note Address 16th November 1999 COMDEX 1999 Las Vegas Nevada 15th to 19th November 1999.Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, D. (1995). Technological or Media Determinism. Accessed April 27, 2008, from: http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/tecdet/tecdet.html.
  16. Drucker, P.T. (1994). The age of social transformation. The Atlantic Monthy. November, 53–79.Google Scholar
  17. Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. (2002). Generations, culture and society. Buckingham: Open UP.Google Scholar
  18. Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: a critical theory revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Futures Project (2001). The Futures Project: Policy for Higher Education in a Changing World Future Policy Scenario. In Search of the New Economy: Encouraging Private Competitors to Fill the Demand for Skills. Accessed April 27, 2008, from: http://www.futuresproject.org/publications/globalya.pdf.
  20. Gandel, P. B., Katz, R. N., & Metros, S. E. (2004). The ‘weariness of the flesh’: Reflections of the mind in an era of abundance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(1), 70–79. Accessed April 27, 2008, from: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/.Google Scholar
  21. Giani, U. (2010). e-Learning, social networks analysis and the diffusion of innovation. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(1), 51–58. http://je-lks.maieutiche.economia.unitn.it/index.php/Je-LKS_EN/article/viewFile/388/374.Google Scholar
  22. Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the knowledge wave?: The knowledge society and the future of education. Wellington NZ: NZCER Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  24. Habermas, J. (1970). Technology and science as “ideology.” In J. Shapiro (Trans.), Toward a rational society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Held, D. (1980). Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Henwood, D. (2003). After the new economy. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hilton, J. (2006). The future for higher education: sunrise or perfect storm? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 58–71. March/April 2006.Google Scholar
  28. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. (2004). Dialectic of enlightenment, trans. J. Cumming, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  29. Jukes, I., McCain, T., & Crockett, L. (2010). Understanding the digital generation: Teaching and learning in the new digital landscape. London: Corwin.Google Scholar
  30. Kurzweil, R. (2001) The law of accelerating returns. KurzweilAI.net. Accessed April 26, 2008 from: http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1.
  31. Lenzner, R., & Johnson, S.S. (1997). Seeing things as they really are. Forbes. March 10. Accessed April 28, 2008, from: http://www.forbes.com/forbes/97/0310/5905122a.htm.
  32. Lucas, (2003). Edutopia: The George Lucas educational foundation. Foreword by George Lucas, http://www.edutopia.org/php/article.php?id=Art_1043Google Scholar
  33. Mattelart, A. (2003). The information society: An introduction. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Mahony, M.J., & Wozniak, H. (2005). Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory and professional development in eLearning: a case study of the ‘CHS eLearning Resource and Staff Support Project’. Breaking Down Boundaries: Institutional Perspectives in Open and Distance Learning, pp. 70–78. Accessed March 14, 2008. http://www.unisa.edu.au/odlaaconference/PDFs/68%20ODLAA%202005%20-%20Mahony%20&%20Wozniak.pdf.
  35. Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, 38(8). Accessed April 26, 2008 from: ftp://download.intel.com/museum/Moores_Law/Articles-Press_Releases/Gordon_Moore_1965_Article.pdf.
  36. Newman, F., & Couturier, L. K. (2001). The new competitive arena: Market forces invade the academy. Change, 33(5), 11–17.Google Scholar
  37. Nichols, R. G., & Allen-Brown, V. (1996). Critical theory and educational technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 226–252). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Norris, D., Mason, J., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Transforming E-knowledge. Ann Arbor: Society for College and University Planning.Google Scholar
  39. Nuechterlein, J. (1990). The good liberal. National Review Date: 5/14/1990. Accessed March 14, 2008 from http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-8970359.html.
  40. OED [Oxford English Dictionary]. (2007). Oxford: Oxford UP. Accessed April 27, 2008, from: http://www.oed.com/.
  41. Pannabecker, J. R. (1991). Technological impacts and determinism in technology education: alternate metaphors from social constructivism. Journal of Technology Education, 3(1). http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v3n1/html/pannabecker.html.
  42. Pedró, F. (2009). New millennium learners in higher education: evidence and policy implications. International conference on 21st century competencies, 21–23 September, 2009. Brussels: OECD. http://www.nml-conference.be/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/NML-in-Higher-Education.pdf.
  43. Polsani, P. (2003). The network learning. In Nyíri Kristof (Ed.), Communications in the 21st century: Essays on philosophy, psychology, education (pp. 139–149). Vienna: Passagen Verlag. Draft available online: http://www.ltc.arizona.edu/pdf/NetworkLearning.pdf.Google Scholar
  44. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 9 (5). http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/prensky%20-%20digital%20natives,%20digital%20immigrants%20-%20part1.pdf.
  45. Reeves, T. C., & Oh, E. J. (2008). Generation differences and educational technology research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 295–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan. Reference, USA. Also available online: http://ikit.org/fulltext/inpressKB.pdf.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, M. R. (1994). Technological determinism in American culture. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 1–35). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  49. Smith Nash, S. (2005). Solving the “Cottage industry” problem in E-learning programs. Xplanazine. January 5, 2005. http://www.xplanazine.com/archives/2005/01/solving_the_cot.php.
  50. Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  51. Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  52. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thompson Rivers UniversityKamloopsCanada

Personalised recommendations