Internet Gambling pp 63-76

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Behavioral Medicine book series (BRIEFSBEHAVIO, volume 1) | Cite as

Characteristics of Internet Gamblers

  • Sally Gainsbury
Chapter

Abstract

Internet gambling is more than simply a technological medium through which to access traditional gambling products. It represents an entirely new mode and form of gambling that has changed the nature of gambling products and the way in which players use these. Online gambling has specific features that make it appealing and pose potential risks to players. In particular, it is highly accessible, convenient and affordable, offers a comfortable way for individuals to gamble anonymously in private on an immersive interface using electronic forms of money. Although many Internet gamblers appear to also engage in land-based gambling, Internet gamblers appear to be different from traditional gamblers and use online gambling for different reasons and in different ways. This chapter explores the differences between Internet and non-Internet gambling and gamblers. Research findings are presented to outline the demographic characteristics and breakdown of online gamblers and other related behaviours such as substance use. Details are provided of how online gamblers use the Internet for other purposes as well as their participation and behavioural patterns relating to online gambling. Motivations for online gambling and perceived advantages and disadvantages of this mode of access are discussed.

Keywords

Internet gamblers Online gambling Demographics Characteristics • Motivations Advantages Behaviour Land-based gambling 

References

  1. American Gaming Association. (2006). 2006 State of the states: The AGA survey of casino entertainment. Washington, DC: American Gaming Association.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, J. (2007). Owning a sportsbook is not a licence to print money. Retrieved from http://www.puntingace.com/bettingguide/own_sportsbook.html
  3. Bernhard, B. J., Lucas, A. F., & Shampaner, E. (2007). Internet gambling in Nevada. Las Vegas: International Gaming Institute/University of Nevada.Google Scholar
  4. Broda, A., LaPlante, D., Nelson, A., LaBrie, R., Bosworth, L., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Virtual harm reduction efforts for internet gambling: Effects of deposit limits on actual internet sports gambling behaviour. Harm Reduction Journal, 5, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter, M. (2005). More women betting on online poker. Pittsburgh Post Gazette.Google Scholar
  6. Church-Sanders, R. (2010). The global business of online casinos: Outlook, forecasts and analysis. London: iGaming Business.Google Scholar
  7. Corney, R., & Davis, J. (2010). The attractions and risks of internet gambling for women: A qualitative study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cotte, J., & Latour, K. (2009). Blackjack in the kitchen: Understanding online versus casino gambling. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 742–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derevensky, J., Sklar, A., Gupta, R., & Messerlian, C. (2010). An empirical study examining the impact of gambling advertisements on adolescent gambling attitudes and behaviours. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DoJ brings more charges against Full Tilt. (2011). Gaming Intelligence. Retrieved from http://www.gamingintelligence.com/business/13310-doj-brings-more-charges-against-full-tilt
  11. Dowling, N., Jackson, A., Thomas, S., & Frydenberg, E. (2010). Children at risk of developing problem gambling. Melbourne: The Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre.Google Scholar
  12. Dragicevic, S., Tsogas, G., & Kudic, A. (2011). Analysis of casino online gambling data in relation to behavioural risk markers for high-risk gambling and player protection. International Gambling Studies, 11, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. eCOGRA. (2007). An exploratory investigation in the attitudes and behaviours of internet Casino and poker players. Nottingham: Institute for the study of gambling and commercial gaming: Nottingham Trent University.Google Scholar
  14. Fall in disputes resolved in favour of players, says eCOGRA. (2011) Gaming intelligence. Retrieved from http://www.gamingintelligence.com/legal/12621-fall-in-disputes-resolved-in-favour-of-players-says-ecogra
  15. Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., McCole, P., & Ramsey E. (2007). The moderating role of perceived effectiveness of third party control on trust and online repurchasing intentions. Proceedings, Americas conference on information systems, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  16. Gainsbury, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011b). Invited submission to the joint select committee on gambling reform inquiry into interactive gambling. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/gamblingreform_ctte/interactive_online_gambling_advertising/submissions.htm
  17. Games and Casino (2006). Blacklisted casinos. Retrieved from http://www.gamesandcasino.com/blacklist.htm
  18. Griffiths, M. D. (2001). Internet gambling: Preliminary results of the first UK prevalence study. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues. Retrieved from http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/research/griffiths_article.html
  19. Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths, M. (2006). Is internet gambling more addictive than casino gambling. Casino and Gaming International, 2, 85–91.Google Scholar
  21. Griffiths M., & Barnes, A. (2007) Internet gambling: An online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Retrieved from http://0-springerlink.metapress.com.darius.uleth.ca/content/pw2t7173282mg277/fulltext.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2007.
  22. Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Sociodemographic correlates of internet gambling: Findings from the 2007 British gambling prevalence survey. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: A survey of attitudes and behavior among internet gamblers. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ipsos Reid. (2005). Online poker in North America: A syndicated study. Retrieved from http://www.ipsos-na.com
  25. Johnson, C., & Hult, P. (2008). Web buyers and their expectations grow up: Experienced web buyers are becoming the new mainstream. Forrest Research.Google Scholar
  26. Jolley, B., Mizerski, R., & Olaru, D. (2006). How habit and satisfaction affects player retention for online gambling. Journal of Business Research, 59, 770–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimber, G. (2011). Player protection, the final frontier. eGaming Review, Retrieved from: http://www.egrmagazine.com/blog/1682447/player-protection-the-final-frontier.thtml
  28. LaBrie, R., LaPlante, D., Nelson, S., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of internet sports gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 347–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S. A., Laplante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Inside the virtual casino: A prospective longitudinal study of actual internet casino gambling. European Journal of Public Health, 18, 410–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ladd, G., & Petry, N. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: A focus on internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 76–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamont, M., Hing, N., & Gainsbury, S. (2011). Gambling on sport sponsorship: A conceptual framework for research and regulatory review. Sport Management Review, 14, 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LaPlante, D., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Population trends in internet sports gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2399–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). The relationships between disordered gambling, type of gambling, and gambling involvement in the British gambling prevalence survey 2007. European Journal of Public Health Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp177.
  34. Levine, M. (2010). Current and future trends driving Australia’s gambling sector. Sydney: Gambling Reform Summit.Google Scholar
  35. McBride, J. (2006). Internet gambling among youth: A preliminary examination. International Centre for Youth Gambling Problems & High-Risk Behaviors Newsletter, 6, 1.Google Scholar
  36. McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2009). Internet gambling behaviour in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M. (2010). Motivating and inhibiting factors in online gambling behaviour: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. doi:Advance online publication DOI: 10.1007/s11469-010-9300-7.
  38. McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M. (2011). What differentiates professional poker players from recreational poker players? A qualitative interview study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. doi:Advance online publication DOI: 10.1007/s11469-011-9312-y.
  39. McMillen, J. (2004) Internet gambling – a research perspective. DCITA Review of issues related to the commonwealth interactive gambling regulationGoogle Scholar
  40. McMillen, J., &Woolley, R. (2003). Australian online gambling policy: A lost opportunity? Pacific conference on I-gaming, Alice Springs.Google Scholar
  41. McMullan, J. L., & Rege, A. (2010). Online crime and internet gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 54–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monaghan, S., Derevensky, J., & Sklar, A. (2009) Impact of gambling advertisements on children and adolescents: Policy recommendations to minimize harm. Journal of Gambling Issues, 22, 252–274. Retrieved from http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue22/06monaghan-derevensky.html
  43. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2001). Internet gambling: A small qualitative pilot study. Paper presented at the psychology and the internet conference, British Psychological Society, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Phillips, J. G., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Gambling and the impact of new and emerging technologies and associated products. Port Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia. Retrieved from http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/CA256DB1001771FB/page/GRA+Research+Reports-Gambling+and+the+impact+of+new+and+emerging+technologies+and+associated+products?OpenDocument&1=35-GRA+Research+Reports∼&2=0-
  45. Ranade, S., Bailey, S., & Harvey, A. (2006). A literature review and survey of statistical sources on remote gambling. London: RSeconsulting.Google Scholar
  46. Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-loyalty: Your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review, 78, 105–113.Google Scholar
  47. RSeConsulting. (2006) A literature review and survey of statistical sources on remote gambling: Final report. Retrieved from http://www.culture.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/89D59ABD-A1F6-4106-B922-2293997EF841/0/RemoteGamblingAppendix_RSeReport.pdf
  48. South Australian Centre for Economic Studies. (2008). Social and economic impact study into gambling in Tasmania 2008: Fact Sheets. Retrieved from http://www.dhhs.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/33027/Vol_2_Fact_Sheets.pdf
  49. Stinchfield, R., Jiménez-Murcia, S., Fernández-Aranda, F., Santamaría, J., Granero, R., Penelo, E. et al., (2011). Are online pathological gamblers different from non-online pathological gamblers on demographics, gambling problem severity, psychopathology, and personality characteristics? International Gambling Studies, 11 Google Scholar
  50. Toce-Gerstein, M., & Gerstein, D. (2007). Questionnaire design: The art of a stylized conversation. In G. Smith, D. Hodgins, & R. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 55–86). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Urban, G. L., Sultan, F., & Qualls, W. (1999). Design and evaluation of a trust based advisor on the Internet. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://ebusiness.mit.edu/research/papers/Urban.pdf
  52. Volberg, R. A., Nysse-Carris, K. L., & Gerstein, D. R. (2006). 2006 California problem gambling prevalence survey. Final report. Submitted to the California Department of Alcohol and drug Problems, Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling.Google Scholar
  53. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Griffiths, M., Orford, J., & Volberg, R. (2011). Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration Evidence from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. International Gambling Studies, 11 Google Scholar
  54. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2007). Problem gambling on the internet: Implications for internet gambling policy in North America. New Media & Society, 9, 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2010). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
  56. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2011). A comparative profile of the internet gambler: Demographic characteristics, game play patterns, and problem gambling status. New Media & Society, 13, 1123-1141Wood, R., Williams, R., & Lawton, P. (2007). Why do internet gamblers prefer online versus land-based venues: Some preliminary findings and implications. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20.Google Scholar
  57. Woodruff, C., & Gregory, S. (2005). Profile of internet gamblers: Betting on the future. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 9, 1–14.Google Scholar
  58. Woolley, R. (2003). Mapping internet gambling: Emerging modes of online participation in wagering and sports betting. International Gambling Studies, 3, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sally Gainsbury
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations