Enhancement of ATC in Presence of SSSC Using Linear and Reactive Methods

  • Y. Chittemma
  • S. Lalitha kumari
  • A. Varaprasad Rao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 150)

Abstract

Fast, accurate algorithms to compute network capabilities are indispensable for transfer-based electricity markets. Available Transfer Capability (ATC) is a measure of the remaining power transfer capability of the transmission network for further transactions. Transmission System Operators (TSOs) are encouraged to use the existing facilities more efficiently. One of the limitations of reactive ATC is the error produced by neglecting the effect of reactive power flows in line loading. This paper presents the determination of shunt reactive power compensation with Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices, the Static Synchronous Series Compensator (SSSC) to improve the transfer capability of a power system incorporating the Linear and Reactive power flows in ATC calculations. By redistributing the power flow, the ATC is improved. Studies on a sample 5-bus power system model are presented to illustrate the effect of shunt compensation along with line flow control.

Keywords

Reactive and linear method ATC PTDF SSSC 

References

  1. 1.
    (1996) NERC transmission transfer capability task force. Available transfer capability definitions and determination. North American Electric Reliability Council, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ejebe GC, Waight JG, Santos-Nieto M, Tinney WF (2000) Fast calculation of linear available transfer capability. IEEE Trans Power Sys 15:1112–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pavella M, Ruiz-Vega D, Giri J, Avila-Rosales R (1999) An integrated scheme for on-line static and transient stability constrained ATC calculations. In IEEE Power Eng Soc Summer Meet 1:273–276Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Repo S (1998) Real-time transmission capacity calculation in voltage stability limited power systems. In: Proceedings of the bulk power system dynamics and control IV-restructuring, Santorini, Greece, 24–28 Aug 1998Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gravener MH, Nwankpa C (1999) Available transfer capability and first order sensitivity. IEEE Trans Power Sys 14:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ajjarapu V, Christy C (1992) The continuation power flow: A tool for steady state voltage stability analysis. IEEE Trans Power Sys 7:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stott B, Marinho JL (1979) Linear programming for power system network security applications. IEEE Trans Power Apparat Sys PAS-98:837–848Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Landgren GL, Anderson SW (1973) Simultaneous power interchange capability analysis. IEEE Trans Power Apparat Sys PAS-92:1973–1986Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schauder CD, Grenhardt M, Stacey E, Lemak T, Gyugyi L (1995) Development of a ± 100 Mvar static condenser for voltage control of transmission systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 10(3):1486–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gyugyi L, Shauder CD, Sen KK (1997) Static synchronous series compensation of transmission lines. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 12(1)406–413Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gyugyi L, Shauder CD, Williams SL, Reitman TR, Torgerson DR, Edris A (1995) The unified power flow controller a new approach to power transmission control. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 10(2):1085–1093Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gyugyi L, Sen KK, Schauder CD (1999) The interline power flow management in transmission system. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 4(3)1115–1123Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    North American Reliabilty Council (1996) Available transfer capability definition and determinationGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Srinu Naik R, Vaisakh K, Anand Kumar K (2009) Identification of overloading line using ATC linear methods with PTDF. Int J Electron Electr Eng 04:6, SUMMER-2009Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Srinu Naik R, Vaisakh K, Anand Kumar K (2009) ATC enhancement with TCSC using linear and reactive methods. Int J Electron Electr Eng 03:4, SUMMER-2009Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srinu Naik R, Vaisakh K, Kiran Chandra P (2010) Effect of shunt reactive power compensation on ATC using linear methods with FACTS. In: International conference on recent advancements in electrical sciences (ICRACE-2010, IEEE) 8th and 9th Jan 2010 at K.S.R College of Engineering, Tiruchengode-637215Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Srinu Naik R, Vaisakh K, Anand Kumar K (2010) Determination of ATC with PTDF using linear methods in presence of TCSC. In: International conference on electrical energy systems (ICEES-2010, IEEE), on 26th–28th Feb 2010 at SingaporeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Chittemma
    • 1
  • S. Lalitha kumari
    • 1
  • A. Varaprasad Rao
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringGMR Institute of Technology,RajamRajamIndia
  2. 2.National Aerospace Laboratories, Department of Electrical DivisionBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations