Skip to main content

Optimal Node Selection Using Estimated Data Accuracy Model in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 150))

Abstract

One of the major tasks of wireless sensor network is to sense accurate data from the physical environment. Hence in this paper, we propose a new methodology called Estimated Data Accuracy Model (EDAM) for randomly deployed sensor nodes which can sense more accurate data from the physical environment. We compare our results with other information accuracy models which show that EDAM performs better than the other models. Moreover we simulate EDAM under such situation where some of the sensor nodes become malicious due to extreme physical environment. Finally using our propose model, we construct a probabilistic approach for selecting an optimal set of sensor nodes from the randomly deployed maximal set of sensor nodes in the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akyuildz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramanian Y, Cayirci E (2002) A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 40:102–104

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pradhan SS, Ramchandran K (2000) Distributed source coding: symmetric rates and applications to sensor networks. Proceedings of the data compressions conference, pp 363–372

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gastpar M, Vetterli M (2003) Source channel communication in sensor networks. Second international workshop on information processing in sensor networks

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vuran MC, Akan OB, Akyildiz IF (2004) Spatio-temporal correlation: theory and applications for WSNs. Comput Netw J 45(3):245–259

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li H, Jiang S, Wei G (2006) Information accuracy aware jointly sensing nodes selection in wireless sensor networks. LNCS. Springer, Berlin, pp 736–747

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cai K, Wei G, Li H (2008) Information accuracy versus jointly sensing nodes in WSNs. IEEE Asia Pacific conference on circuits and systems, pp 1050–1053

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karjee J, Jamadagni HS (2012) Energy aware node selection for cluster-based data accuracy estimation in wireless sensor networks. Int J Adv Netw Appl 3(5):1311–1322

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karjee J, Jamadagni HS (2011) Data accuracy model for distributed clustering algorithm based on spatial data correlation in wireless sensor networks. http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2644 (under review)

  9. Karjee J, Jamadagni HS (2011) Data accuracy estimation for spatially correlated data in wireless sensor networks under distributed clustering. J Netw 6(7):1072–1083

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karjee J, Jamadagni HS (2011) Data accuracy estimation for cluster with spatially correlated data in wireless sensor networks. IEEE international conference on information system and computational intelligence, China, vol 3, pp 284–291

    Google Scholar 

  11. Perillo MA, Heinzelman WB (2003) Optimal sensor management under energy and reliability constraints. Proceedings of IEEE wireless communications and networking, pp 1621–1626

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ordonez F, Krishnamachari B (2004) Optimal information extraction in energy limited wireless sensor network. IEEE J Sel Area Commun 22(6):1121–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karjee J, Banerjee S (2008) Tracing the abnormal behavior of malicious nodes in MANET. Fourth international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, Dalian, China, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poor V (1994) An Introduction to signal detection and estimation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Syed AH (2008) Adaptive filters. John, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goblick TJ (1965) Theoretical limitations on the transmission of data from analog sources. IEEE Trans Theory IT-11(4):558–567

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berger JO, de Oliviera V, Sanso B (2001) Objective Bayesian analysis of spatially correlated data. J Am Statist Assoc 96:1361–1374

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Olivera V, Kedan B, Short DA (1997) Bayesian prediction of transformed Gaussian Random Fields. J Am Stat Assoc 92:1422–1433

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jyotirmoy Karjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karjee, J., Jamadagni, H.S. (2013). Optimal Node Selection Using Estimated Data Accuracy Model in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Das, V. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Trends in Information, Telecommunication and Computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 150. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3363-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3363-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3362-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3363-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics